- Joined
- Feb 12, 2006
- Messages
- 15,998
- Reaction score
- 3,962
- Location
- Tiamat's better half
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Stace on abortion:
Ooooh right which is why you chose to adopt an older child that's all screwed up from being neglected vs getting pregnant right? Ooops wait that's not true!:rofl
Funny that you will defend a woman's right to kill her baby in utero on a whim....abortion on demand for any and all reasons or no reason at all...
then simultaneously you will turn around and put down a couple that wants a "baby" and insinuate that you are somehow morally superior because you are more concerned about the older children that need to be adopted. What a bunch of total bulls-hit. Basically you d-on't give a f-uck either way you're just mouthing off a talking point the hysterical feminists taught you. Every child a wanted child...right? Ain't that the slogan? And infertile couples who can no longer adopt babies unless they are rich enough to go buy one from another country can just suck it up because those b-astards should be out adopting the older more f-ucked up kids that they may or may not be able to handle...right?
Let me ask you something if you are sooooo concerned about the older neglected kids that can't get adopted and you believe infertile couples should be out adopting them vs selfishly trying to adopt healthy babies then why the f-uck are you pregnant vs out there adopting some 7 year old crack addict who was molested and now has a pyro fetish?????? Hmmmm? Maybe cause that logic is ridiculous?
Stace said:That's the point. I'm a little more concerned with those that are already living and do not have good homes. We need to learn to take care of those that are already here before we worry about those that are not.
Ooooh right which is why you chose to adopt an older child that's all screwed up from being neglected vs getting pregnant right? Ooops wait that's not true!:rofl
Funny that you will defend a woman's right to kill her baby in utero on a whim....abortion on demand for any and all reasons or no reason at all...
then simultaneously you will turn around and put down a couple that wants a "baby" and insinuate that you are somehow morally superior because you are more concerned about the older children that need to be adopted. What a bunch of total bulls-hit. Basically you d-on't give a f-uck either way you're just mouthing off a talking point the hysterical feminists taught you. Every child a wanted child...right? Ain't that the slogan? And infertile couples who can no longer adopt babies unless they are rich enough to go buy one from another country can just suck it up because those b-astards should be out adopting the older more f-ucked up kids that they may or may not be able to handle...right?
Let me ask you something if you are sooooo concerned about the older neglected kids that can't get adopted and you believe infertile couples should be out adopting them vs selfishly trying to adopt healthy babies then why the f-uck are you pregnant vs out there adopting some 7 year old crack addict who was molested and now has a pyro fetish?????? Hmmmm? Maybe cause that logic is ridiculous?
Last edited: