Or that people don't always speak well, give proper context, meaning to what they say. I give people the benefit of the doubt, especially when looking at context of what they are saying and have stated prior.
We know he knew in March that they could go, had a heads up that it was likely coming. But he had filed his paperwork to run for office in Feb 2005. They did not have orders at that time and things could have changed before they were issued orders.
it looks really hypocritical for a poster to denigrate this man for retiring, after 24 years....all the while they are giving Trump a pass.
Still waiting on your past posts. Tick tock, tick tock.
Um, he had asthma for ****s sake....how do you get them to take you in the service with ASTHMA?
He has said more than once that he never was in combat.
Yeah, well, after 24 years he's allowed to retire and run for Congress, which is another way to serve one's country. Maybe he did retire to avoid what he might have reasonably assumed would have been another extended deployment (but before that was announced), and that would have put off his run for another two years at least.
Where has Walz said that he has actually done so? Specific statements he has. I'm tired of people making claims about what he was trying to "suggest" when it sounds more like they are trying to infer.
she is trying to claim that he is a draft dodger as if he planned on being born with a condition like asthma.
they weren't being deployed when he retired or when he filed for retirement...
They are a 'concern' for people in search of 'concerns' to crap on his military service.