• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Three Trump Judges Just Issued a Shock Ruling That Could Wreak Havoc on the Election

Oh, you're a clever one! You think that if you can show a handful of disputed ballots out of millions that somehow that justifies disenfranchising millions of voters.

Go ahead, show us the evidence. I dare you.
I mean, there was this one:

(…oh wait, it was because of his own party…)
 
I mean, there was this one:

(…oh wait, it was because of his own party…)
The bipartisan State Election Board unanimously voted to call for a new election for the 9th district, because of ballot fraud by Republican operatives.

And even that did not make a difference. The Republican won the new election, just like Republicans have since 1963.

Next!
 
how do you know every ballot was filled out by or approved by the person who the ballot was intended??
How do I know that every time I vote and hit the button or run the Scantron through the machine, my vote was cast the way it was supposed to be? I mean, how do I know that the letter I mail at the post office will actually go to the company it's intended for?
 
The bipartisan State Election Board unanimously voted to call for a new election for the 9th district, because of ballot fraud by Republican operatives.

And even that did not make a difference. The Republican won the new election, just like Republicans have since 1963.

Next!
Precisely :)

(Hence the "Oh, wait … it was because of his own party" snide comment :) )
 
play stupid games win stupid prizes,,
to trust the post office with one of the most important actions taken by the average american is plain stupid
next time show up in person and vote like normal people do,,

this is a good ruling and hopefully it leads to ending ,mail in ballots,,
DeJoy is a sabotaging Trump hack and traitor, as we saw in 2020 with mail-in voting and reapportionment.
 
Oh, you're a clever one! You think that if you can show a handful of disputed ballots out of millions that somehow that justifies disenfranchising millions of voters.

Go ahead, show us the evidence. I dare you.
I never said anything of the kind,,

why are you so defensive when I point out the flaws in your claims??

you to are dismissed,,
 
that is if your goal is a free and fair election,,
Ah, so that's your real issue. You think mail-in ballots make it easier to commit fraud on a scale that would change election results. This has not proved to be an issue so far.
 
What do you think its purpose is?
As openly stated by Trump and other republicans, they don’t like large turnout. Fewer voters enhance GOP chances to win. So since the Supremes decision on the Voting Rights Act, we have seen a full court press on access to the polls.
 
I'm going further research the plaintiffs here and see if we can tie them (or the defendants) directly back Trump or Harris, vis-a-vis Project 2025, etc. Will let you know the results :)
 
Back
Top Bottom