This is going to be the new normal.

[Luce]

It started in 2016 and has become the new normal. Just as Democrats opened up a can of worms under Harry Reid, so to have the left brought this about, the constant questioning of election results.

This constant, endless recount bullshit using private contractors began in 2016? Really? Post a link.

 

[Luce]

It's not democracy you cannot trust it's the politicians and those running the systems.

You'd prefer King Donald I, presumably?

 

[Luce]

Do you not realize this have been happening for decades. Democrats have challenged elections all over the country for years. Nothing new.

Did they use private contractors being paid in dark money, who announced what they expected to find?

 

[Buckeyes85]

It started in 2016 and has become the new normal. Just as Democrats opened up a can of worms under Harry Reid, so to have the left brought this about, the constant questioning of election results.

The left brought about the constant questioning of election results? Did I read that correctly?

 

[Ikari]

No. This isn't the "new normal". This stuff is necessary because of the blatant election fraud of 2020 and the concerted efforts to cover it up.

Rest assured, if the election fraud doesn't exist there won't be all these examinations, reviews, audits, etc.

The Big Lie is a lie, and we're not buying it anymore. It's stupid and all y'all are doing is trying to cast doubt even though there's never been evidence, which is why dozens upon dozens of lawsuits have continually been thrown out of court.

There was no election fraud on the level necessary to overturn an election, so get out of here with your Big Lie.

 

[Luce]

The left brought about the constant questioning of election results? Did I read that correctly?

You were somehow expecting intellectual honesty? Or any kind of honesty?

 

[Ikari]

You were somehow expecting intellectual honesty? Or any kind of honesty?

Not from the Cult, we've seen the 4+ years of their rampant lying. What I find funny is that so many will support these endless audits of a fair and free election where there has been zero evidence of massive fraud, but will try to pretend we don't need a committee to investigate the 1/6 Sedition in which a violent, armed mob of Cultists actually did lead an assault against Congress and try to interfere with the certification of election results.

Reality isn't the Cult's friend and they do everything to avoid it.

 

[Luce]

Not from the Cult, we've seen the 4+ years of their rampant lying. What I find funny is that so many will support these endless audits of a fair and free election where there has been zero evidence of massive fraud, but will try to pretend we don't need a committee to investigate the 1/6 Sedition in which a violent, armed mob of Cultists actually did lead an assault against Congress and try to interfere with the certification of election results.

Reality isn't the Cult's friend and they do everything to avoid it.

Yeah, that's kind of why I view them as enemies now, rather than merely opponents.

 

[Ikari]

Yeah, that's kind of why I view them as enemies now, rather than merely opponents.

Oh, the 1/6 Seditionists, Seditionist-Enablers, and Seditionist-Sympathizers clearly hate America, Democracy, and our Constitution. They'll do anything to undermine it all for the sake of their Dear Leader. They're essentially just authoritative fascists wishing for their rule and their rule only over all.

 

[WillyPete]

No...I mean "blatant election fraud".

Definition of blatant​

​

2: completely obvious, conspicuous, or obtrusive especially in a crass or offensive manner : brazen​

​

blatant disregard for the rules​

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blatant

The courts refused to consider the election fraud evidence. (You really must stop conflating "voter fraud" with "election fraud". Two different things.)

I mean exactly what I say.

I feel sorry for you.

If it was blatant as defined above, you would be able to explain it convincingly to the general public, and generate enough righteous indignation to compel action from the courts.

But it's not blatant, and they haven't managed to string a narrative together that makes sense, let alone convinces anyone of anything.

They shriek FRAUD in public and whisper "not claiming fraud, your honor" in court.

And they can't even find judges to whisper to, anymore.

 

[Buckeyes85]

You were somehow expecting intellectual honesty? Or any kind of honesty?

I know.

Next up. Marjorie Taylor Greene will blame the jews for inciting the holocaust.

 

[Acadia]

It's not just Arizona: Push to review 2020 ballots spreads

ATLANTA (AP) — Six months after Donald Trump's loss, conspiracy theorists and backers of former President Donald Trump are continuing their push for repeated examinations of ballots and finding limited successes.

apnews.com

This is going to happen in every single election from this point forward, no matter how the elections go or who wins (I mean, you don't expect payback?). The critical idea of the Trump team - "You can't trust democracy" has been realized.

You can't assume every election is without fraud.
But I can assume Democrats will fight any and all efforts to secure elections.

 

[Acadia]

Make election procedures secure, quit playing the pathetic game of calling election security voter suppression, and we'll be just fine in trusting future elections. BUT MAKE ELECTION PROCEDURES SECURE! It's essential.

Voter I.D.

 

[Luce]

You can't assume every election is without fraud.
But I can assume Democrats will fight any and all efforts to secure elections.

You can assume we're going to turn races in which you win into never-ending recounts, audits, and litigation.

 

[mike2810]

No. This isn't the "new normal". This stuff is necessary because of the blatant election fraud of 2020 and the concerted efforts to cover it up.

Rest assured, if the election fraud doesn't exist there won't be all these examinations, reviews, audits, etc.

Would you support audits in the States Trump won? You know , to make sure everything was up and up.

What is more telling is there is no effort to audit every State.

 

[poweRob]

It's not just Arizona: Push to review 2020 ballots spreads

ATLANTA (AP) — Six months after Donald Trump's loss, conspiracy theorists and backers of former President Donald Trump are continuing their push for repeated examinations of ballots and finding limited successes.

apnews.com

This is going to happen in every single election from this point forward, no matter how the elections go or who wins (I mean, you don't expect payback?). The critical idea of the Trump team - "You can't trust democracy" has been realized.

The one in Fulton Co, Georgia is funded by the Kraken lady firm.

 

[SNOWFLAKE]

Rest assured, if the election fraud doesn't exist there won't be all these examinations, reviews, audits, etc.

 

[poweRob]

So tell me... where is the evidence? Didn't Giuliani say he was going to reveal it? When did he do it? Where did he do it? Did you uncover evidence?

That's the thing about democracy. Sometimes your side loses. Sometimes your side is the majority. It's supposed to taste like a turd sandwich. The pendulum will always keep swinging. Eventually your side will have control for a few, then back to the other side, then back to your side.

Some people will be happy when the person is voted in. Some people will be happy when they see what he does. Some people will be happy when they leave. Wait your turn. You'll find happiness sometime.

I'm sure Guilani will present the "evidence" soon in front of some dildo store.

 

[poweRob]

It's hidden in pillows.

 

[AGENT J]

Forever.

I dont think it will be forever because I think it will eventually play itself out as the losing strategy it is.

 

[Lursa]

No. This isn't the "new normal". This stuff is necessary because of the blatant election fraud of 2020 and the concerted efforts to cover it up.

Rest assured, if the election fraud doesn't exist there won't be all these examinations, reviews, audits, etc.

Got that evidence I ask for from time to time yet?

Odd that there's no investigation/commission into the election, not even SUGGESTED in the 2.5 months before the inauguration. Odd, right?

And none in Jan? None now? Why not? It's totally in their own self-interest, right? To regain the WH? At least to prove Biden's 'illegitimate?'

 

[reflechissez]

It's not just Arizona: Push to review 2020 ballots spreads

ATLANTA (AP) — Six months after Donald Trump's loss, conspiracy theorists and backers of former President Donald Trump are continuing their push for repeated examinations of ballots and finding limited successes.

apnews.com

This is going to happen in every single election from this point forward, no matter how the elections go or who wins (I mean, you don't expect payback?). The critical idea of the Trump team - "You can't trust democracy" has been realized.

It's only going to happen in districts/states that the republicans lost.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

God Damn, dude, you smart!!! You figured all this shit out!!

"Thought yo head would be bigger"

 

[reflechissez]

Make election procedures secure, quit playing the pathetic game of calling election security voter suppression, and we'll be just fine in trusting future elections. BUT MAKE ELECTION PROCEDURES SECURE! It's essential.

They're already secure. You just don't like the outcome.

 

[reflechissez]

It started in 2016 and has become the new normal. Just as Democrats opened up a can of worms under Harry Reid, so to have the left brought this about, the constant questioning of election results.

You'll need to show your work here. Please include examples of "the left" refusing to accept the results of an election (i.e, failure to concede) along with hiring unqualified conspiracy theorists to conduct "forensic" audits. Also, don't forget to include examples of MULTIPLE senators and congress people questioning the outcome of an election 5 months after the votes have been tabulated. Thanks in advance.