- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Many women will have no problem saying to a man that he is nothing but a sperm donor and then go forth and take way his child with the use of the state. That doesn't stop the little bitch from taking his money though, nope.
100% factual false, try to keep the false ranting to a minimum.
American Heritage Dictionary Entry: father
fa·ther (fäthər)
Share: fa·ther
n.
1.a. A male whose sperm unites with an egg, producing an embryo.
b. A male whose impregnation of a female results in the birth of a child.
c. A man who adopts a child.
d. A man who raises a child.
A caregiver that has no biological connection to the child will never be a father, period.
this post is a boiling pot of rage, a sprinkle of biased and a handful or misogyny.
I wonder what factually makes her a "bitch" or even subjectively
The children produced by rape are going to love that one.A caregiver that has no biological connection to the child will never be a father, period.
egg donors, seems pretty self explanatory, this is why i have full custody of my daughter because her egg donor isnt fit to be a parent
The children produced by rape are going to love that one.
1.)How about the fact that she took his kid from him
2.), forced to pay anyway
3.) and then refuses to use the proper term to describe him. Everything points to this woman being a bitch from hell.
you can post this lie as many times as you want but you opinion is meaningless to the facts
I started a thread, and I used the term sperm donor to refer to my ex. Quite a few people, upon reading that term, were suddenly unable to focus on the overall topic of that thread and, instead, zeroed in on my use of that term. So, I've opened this thread where all these individuals can convene and debate it instead of constantly derailing that thread.
Here: I'll provide my definition for Sperm Donor:
"A male who fathers offspring without any intention, desire, want, or concern to be involved in said offspring's life."
As opposed to the use of the term "Dad" or "Father" in which the individual does, in some fashion, have intention, desire, want, or concern to be involved in said offspring's life - even if he is not (due to a large number of circumstances).
If she carried the child to term egg donor doesn't fully describe it though. :/
I think it does and in the subject realm we are talking about thats all that matters . . . .
you need to use much less emotion on this
1.)A simple caregiver will never be a father.
2.) I don't care that the law is trying to challenge this or that people think the law can change it. The law is entirely irreverent to this matter.
3.) There is only ever one father to a child.
Autonomous incubator.She carried the child to term which is more than simply providing the egg. You need a term that describes the process in it's entirely that can be used against women like women are using the term sperm donor against men.
1.)She carried the child to term which is more than simply providing the egg.
2.) You need a term that describes the process in it's entirely
3.) that can be used against women like women are using the term sperm donor against men.
Autonomous incubator.
Sorry, Birth-O-Matic was taken.No, the word choice Autonomous offers respect. It needs to be disrespectful but still factual.
1.) this lie has already been proven false
2.) law isnt even needed for your statment to be false the definition of the word proves you wrong
3.) I agree its not needed for your statment to be 100% false
4.) again no matter how many times you repeat this lie facts destoy it.
tell it to the kids that claim fathers that are not the biological father and see how hard they laugh and prove you factually wrong.
1.)Nope, my statement is 100% factual.
2.) A child can only ever have one father
3.) and while people can assign his name to others those people will never truly have it.
4.) It will only ever be socially created nonsense based on absolutely nothing.
5.) In reality and outside of the minds of fools any man that is not biologically that child's father is NOT his or her father but at best a caregiver.
6.) I will if you have one that I can tell it too.
So what should I call mothers that walk way and don't care for their kids? How can I relate a womans biological function and use that instead of mother? Surely we can't call them what they actually are right?
The only thing that is needed to be a father is to provide sperm. Just because you ladies don't want to accept reality doesn't just make it not a reality. The man will always be that child's father and no one including the father himself can do anything about it. It is what it is.
Nope, sperm donor, not "father." He should not be known as the child's "father" but as sperm donor. Just as a mom who abandons her child should not be considered that child's mother but an egg donor.
I'll grant you that a man who DID NOT KNOW he had a child, because he was gone before it became obvious and nobody ever told him, is NOT at fault in being absent from his child's life... he can hardly be faulted for something he had no idea about.
I might not judge TOO harshly a man who, as is sadly often the case, was PUSHED out of his child's life by the mother for inadequate reasons... seen that happen more often than I used to think it would be.
But if I KNEW I had a child, it would take one hell of a lot to keep me out of that child's life. Just because Mama may be a bitch is insufficient excuse. I had to deal with a very difficult bitchy ex too, even though I had primary custody...
but a man who knowingly and deliberately walked away would have to come up with some really, really good reasons why it was absolutely necessary, before I'd consider that remotely justifiable.
Well, facts disagree with you.
Facts disagree with you. He is a factually that child's father and even if at some point he was a sperm donor once that sperm is used to create a child he is at that point on a father.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?