- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
- Messages
- 85,137
- Reaction score
- 78,190
- Location
- NE Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Quite the opposite, actually. From my perspective you went into propaganda and conspiracy with unfounded accusations. From what I can see, you lost the point about terminology being plastic and instead decided to try and save face by doubling down your narrative. However, you made a mistake that you rarely do, you went away from asking the normal pattern of pseudo-Socratic leading questions that you tend to and instead just flat out told lies. Because of that amusing turn, I reacted with mirth (and a bit of snark, but I tend to be a smart-ass when I sense the advantage).You see the truth I point to I take it?
Now I am a bit curious why you switched styles. Were you caught off guard somehow?
Last edited: