• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The overt racism of Tucker Carlson

Tucker is who he is.

FOX enjoys significant profits putting Tucker front and center of their programming.

If there wasn't an audience for Tucker's propaganda, FOX wouldn't bother with him.

Much like Trump, Tucker isn't the disease. He's just a parasite leeching off the sickness for personal gain.

Parasites do carry disease and do harm. Tucker is one of them.
 
So, attacking a person who the democrats have nominated is now racism? You can call Tucker Carlson out for what you disagree with, but this does not rise to the level of racism.
 

Dans La Lune said:

"He called into question her credentials and said that 'Mericans have a right to see her law school grades. Keep in mind that he never did this for the past three SCOTUS appointments, some of whom were judges for like 10 minutes before being nominated."

By posting this recount of what someone else apparently thinks Carlson said, do you intend to demonstrate anything?
 
If everything is racist then northing is racist. That wasn't racist.
But if you like I suppose we can talk about why MSNBC cut ties with the guy in that clip.
 
It's Tucker's call to see her LSAT scores that is the contentious part. It's very likely that they are subpar compared with other SC appointees.

Is there a reason for him or for you to think that?
 
Back
Top Bottom