- Joined
- Mar 23, 2018
- Messages
- 1,915
- Reaction score
- 343
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Like someone with any sense is going to watch a twenty-eight minute vid and try to figure out what you're yammering about. :roll:
When it comes to hypocrisy, the right are way behind the left.
Explain. Coulter says that having for the very first time the right financed a civil case and got any sitting pres.
to be compelled to testify, claim that because Clinton they say lied and thus should be impeached, means they all
ALL...should be for getting trump the hell out of there.
The right has become immoral, sleazy, no value fascists to support trump and his complete untrustworthiness.
Give me some examples of how the left are hypocrites.
Explain. Coulter says that having for the very first time the right financed a civil case and got any sitting pres.
to be compelled to testify, claim that because Clinton they say lied and thus should be impeached, means they all
ALL...should be for getting trump the hell out of there.
The right has become immoral, sleazy, no value fascists to support trump and his complete untrustworthiness.
Give me some examples of how the left are hypocrites.
Like someone with any sense is going to watch a twenty-eight minute vid and try to figure out what you're yammering about. :roll:
The BOLDED is one reason why no one should even try and explain it to you.
So, you're saying that Ann Coulter represents the entire right? I pay no attention to the far right and I could care less about anything Coulter says.
First things first, republicans did not unianimously vote for impeachment. Second republicans not democrats broke party lines to not convict Clinton, even more so on the charge of the undisputed technical perjury than obstuction due to context of just process.Explain. Coulter says that having for the very first time the right financed a civil case and got any sitting pres.
to be compelled to testify, claim that because Clinton they say lied and thus should be impeached, means they all
ALL...should be for getting trump the hell out of there.
The right has become immoral, sleazy, no value fascists to support trump and his complete untrustworthiness.
Because you can't.
I know there are enough righties here to further show their incredible hypocrisy and ever since Reagan.
When it comes to hypocrisy, the right are way behind the left.
First things first, republicans did not unianimously vote for impeachment. Second republicans not democrats broke party lines to not convict Clinton, even more so on the charge of the undisputed technical perjury than obstuction due to context of just process.
Democrats on the other-hand were also there and on the complete other-side of the issue.
So if you're going to claim hypocrisy; on what charge and in what way is this not a two way street? After all we live in a legal system of precedence, so if this was deemed not grounds for impeachment then on what grounds do we lower the bar in the case of Trump?
fascists
Seems to me that your whining about Clinton's term is the definition of still being in a bubble, my friend.Well if one wishes to continue to tune out what the right did in the 90s when Clinton had the temerity of actually
beating a repub and how they went after him (and Hillary) for 8 years. Office of independent counsel 6 years and $60 million.
Universally, the right wing called for Clinton's resignation. Where is that right now ?
Trump makes Bill Clinton look like a choirboy...and Hillary look like Mary f*cking Poppins.
What they are 'yammering' about is how the republican sleaze in the WH...doesn't need to resign.
That's ok, stay in your bubble.
The BOLDED is one reason why no one should even try and explain it to you.
I CAN all day long, but choose not to.
I gave up arguing with the close-minded over the internet years ago.
great retort PV, Its really nothing but a "nuh uh" but you did it well. Nothing could top that response.
I stand corrected. You followed up your "nuh uh" with the devastating "could too". After such excellent debate I almost feel foolish bringing actual examples for flaming lying hypocrisy from republicans but here goes.
Supported mandates for 20 years but stopped when President Obama supported them
Supported invasion of Iraq 100% but supported our action in Libya 0%
Supported cutting the deficit under President Obama but now balloon the deficit.
And sometimes I wonder if the republican "concern" for deficits was just to sabotage the recovery from the Great Bush Recession. In 2011 when UE was 9% the republicans blocked a jobs bill because of their "concern" for the deficit. But last year they passed a deficit ballooning tax cut to corporations to "help" unemployment when UE was at a 25 year low. I better not think about it too much lest I get one of your devastating rebuttals.
I still think Clinton to be a good president and was not in favour of impeachment. Factoid: Trump called him the next best modern president after Reagan.You are not comparing this **** show to the Clinton case. If their ever was a case of entrapment it was asking Bill to throw his family under the bus under oath.
I still think Clinton to be a good president and was not in favour of impeachment. Trump called him the next best modern president after Reagan.
With no actual charge it is relevant when talking about the standard needed to pursue impeachment.
Well obviously [she] is just one rich, professional, right wing liar and hypocrite but the US has shown the world [she]
and the entire right has shown itself to be full of such political sleaze now by supporting the immoral scum in the WH now.
So, you're saying that Ann Coulter represents the entire right? I pay no attention to the far right and I could care less about anything Coulter says.
First things first, republicans did not unianimously vote for impeachment. Second republicans not democrats broke party lines to not convict Clinton, even more so on the charge of the undisputed technical perjury than obstuction due to context of just process.
Democrats on the other-hand were also there and on the complete other-side of the issue.
So if you're going to claim hypocrisy; on what charge and in what way is this not a two way street? After all we live in a legal system of precedence, so if this was deemed not grounds for impeachment then on what grounds do we lower the bar in the case of Trump?
I CAN all day long, but choose not to.
I gave up arguing with the close-minded over the internet years ago.
If that were true you would not be free to insanely babble whatever you feel like.
You would be treated like this:
UC-Berkeley says ‘Free Speech Week’ is canceled.
Seems to me that your whining about Clinton's term is the definition of still being in a bubble, my friend.