- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 33,000
- Reaction score
- 13,973
- Location
- FL - Daytona
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
How does mailing out ballots translate into fraud?There is nothing nonsensical about it. The Democrats have pushed mail-in ballots to maximize potential election fraud and to raise as many legal and legitimacy issues with the election result as possible. Mailing out 80 MILLION unrequested ballots - with no way to know if the voter even lives at the same address - is just the start of that plan.
There is no way to know if who voted is the voter - plus they eliminate assuring secret voting. There is no way to know who filled out and signed a mail-in ballot. It's not like partisan election divisions have 100,000 handwriting experts. There is no way to know if ballots are just thrown away too - or anything that can be done about it if they are. The votes are still no counted.How does mailing out ballots translate into fraud?
This is the stupidest article I've read in a while. I long-winded fantastical set of election chaos scenarios. The media keeps trying to drum up a constitutional crisis over the presidential election where Biden ultimately wins but Trump won't concede. Huh?
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term
A "red mirage" on election night and a post-election "blue shift" could lead to an unprecedented constitutional crisis just as the Supreme Court is in turmoil.www.yahoo.com
Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President Donald Trump could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent Joe Biden when more votes are tallied.
This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President Mike Pence, with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president.
This is arguably the most likely of the contested-election narratives, and now the Supreme Court — which would likely have to rule on the legal arcana at issue in this epic battle — has been thrown into its own nightmare scenario with the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election.
I'll raise you ballot harvesting and extending the date to count votes 2 WEEKS beyond Nov. 3rd.There is nothing nonsensical about it. The Democrats have pushed mail-in ballots to maximize potential election fraud and to raise as many legal and legitimacy issues with the election result as possible. Mailing out 80 MILLION unrequested ballots - with no way to know if the voter even lives at the same address - is just the start of that plan.
Wait until the Democrats pull the "systemic, structural racism" card over black-voter ballots getting tossed due to technical issues.There is no way to know if who voted is the voter - plus they eliminate assuring secret voting. There is no way to know who filled out and signed a mail-in ballot. It's not like partisan election divisions have 100,000 handwriting experts. There is no way to know if ballots are just thrown away too - or anything that can be done about it if they are. The votes are still no counted.
Not according to these guidelines. It sounds like states, individually, are going to make it difficult to vote erroneously.There is no way to know if who voted is the voter - plus they eliminate assuring secret voting. There is no way to know who filled out and signed a mail-in ballot. It's not like partisan election divisions have 100,000 handwriting experts. There is no way to know if ballots are just thrown away too - or anything that can be done about it if they are. The votes are still no counted.
I don't see Trump attempting a coup as much as a close election being contested. And that's practically what Dems claim is going to happen.Anybody who lived through 2000 shouldn't see this scenario as so unlikely. Why do you?
There is nothing nonsensical about it. The Democrats have pushed mail-in ballots to maximize potential election fraud and to raise as many legal and legitimacy issues with the election result as possible. Mailing out 80 MILLION unrequested ballots - with no way to know if the voter even lives at the same address - is just the start of that plan.
Spot on. Their hiring 600 lawyers is in no way preparing for the post election step of their plan. Right?
Democrats are the ones who are degrading the electorate's trust in US institutions, and then have the gall to project and accuse others of doing the same.
Pity those who believe these con men.
Not according to these guidelines. It sounds like states, individually, are going to make it difficult to vote erroneously.
Table 14: How States Verify Voted Absentee/Mail Ballots
Summarizes methods states use to verify absentee/mail ballots, such as signature verification and having the absentee/mail ballot witnessed or notarized.www.ncsl.org
That's conflating that's going on by some. Very little issues with the absentee ballot process.
There are checks and verifications as part of the process.
Not so with mail-in voting, where live ballots are spewed out into the wild, with far fewer checks and verifications.
How does mailing out ballots translate into fraud?
Goebbells got nothin' on Democrats.Spot on. Their hiring 600 lawyers is in no way preparing for the post election step of their plan. Right?
Democrats are the ones who are degrading the electorate's trust in US institutions, and then have the gall to project and accuse others of doing the same.
Pity those who believe these con men.
Look at this section:
Security Features of Voting by Absentee/Mailed Ballots
on> https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/absentee-and-early-voting.aspx
All-Mail Voting: In a handful of states, a ballot is automatically mailed to every eligible voter (no request or application is necessary). Polling places may also be available for voters who would like to vote in-person. Other states may permit the all-mail option for specific types of elections.
Absentee Voting: In two-thirds of the states, any qualified voter may vote absentee without offering an excuse, and in one-third of the states, an excuse is required. Some states offer a permanent absentee ballot list: once a voter asks to be added to the list, s/he will automatically receive an absentee ballot for all future elections.
I'm sick of leftists insisting that minorities are incapable of doing this. It's bigotry.Thanks for making my point.
From the citation:
Already well known that huge number of voter rolls are woefully inaccurate, i.e. containing many ineligible voters, duplicates of eligible voters, so much so the risk of large scale voter fraud is a legitimate concern, especially when there are ballot harvesters running after all those 'spare' live ballots.
Although, not by much, beyond the initial ballot request.
Frankly, if a voter wants an absentee ballot, they should have to ask for one each and every election, without fail, just as a confirmation and check that an eligible voter is making the request.
Making your point? You cherry-picked some sentences to twist out of context with your editorializing. How about a few of the security procedures listed...Thanks for making my point.
From the citation:
Already well known that huge number of voter rolls are woefully inaccurate, i.e. containing many ineligible voters, duplicates of eligible voters, so much so the risk of large scale voter fraud is a legitimate concern, especially when there are ballot harvesters running after all those 'spare' live ballots.
Although, not by much, beyond the initial ballot request.
Frankly, if a voter wants an absentee ballot, they should have to ask for one each and every election, without fail, just as a confirmation and check that an eligible voter is making the request.
This is the stupidest article I've read in a while. I long-winded fantastical set of election chaos scenarios. The media keeps trying to drum up a constitutional crisis over the presidential election where Biden ultimately wins but Trump won't concede. Huh?
The Nightmare Scenario That Keeps Election Lawyers Up At Night -- And Could Hand Trump A Second Term
A "red mirage" on election night and a post-election "blue shift" could lead to an unprecedented constitutional crisis just as the Supreme Court is in turmoil.www.yahoo.com
Americans will almost certainly go to bed on Nov. 3 without knowing who won the presidential election. Since millions of people will vote by mail, constraints on time and resources will slow ballot counting into potentially a weeks-long process. Voting patterns suggest it’s likely that President Donald Trump could end Election Day in the lead in certain key states, only to be overtaken by Democratic opponent Joe Biden when more votes are tallied.
This could create a nightmare scenario during the three months stretching from Election Day to the Jan. 20 inauguration: a battle on the state and congressional level over who is the legitimate winner. This could include Congress reconvening on Jan. 6, presided over by Vice President Mike Pence, with no consensus over its potential role in choosing the next president.
This is arguably the most likely of the contested-election narratives, and now the Supreme Court — which would likely have to rule on the legal arcana at issue in this epic battle — has been thrown into its own nightmare scenario with the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
There is no way to know if who voted is the voter - plus they eliminate assuring secret voting. There is no way to know who filled out and signed a mail-in ballot. It's not like partisan election divisions have 100,000 handwriting experts. There is no way to know if ballots are just thrown away too - or anything that can be done about it if they are. The votes are still no counted.
mail in and absentee ballots are processed in the exact same way. Neither have issues with fraud.That's conflating that's going on by some. Very little issues with the absentee ballot process.
There are checks and verifications as part of the process.
Not so with mail-in voting, where live ballots are spewed out into the wild, with far fewer checks and verifications.
Any idea how long it will take to check 80 million ballots?How does mailing out ballots translate into fraud?
Any idea how long it will take to check 80 million ballots?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?