- Joined
- Nov 24, 2018
- Messages
- 13,199
- Reaction score
- 2,896
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Suuuuuuure, you're not. :lol:I don't know all the details about this, first of all, because it is so boring, but I have general ideas about it. Democrats are desperate to find something criminal somehow related to the Trump campaign.
It doesn't look as if they will find anything. They arrested Roger Stone because somehow he supposedly had something to do with the wikileaks Clinton emails. And he made some kind of wrong statement, maybe because he didn't have a photographic memory for every detail.
Was the Trump campaign hoping to dig up negative information about Clinton? Probably, that is what political campaigns do.
Alan Dershowitz thinks Mueller won't find anything. He also thinks civil liberties are being threatened, regarding the Infowars ban, for example. He thinks this is all political. And the ACLU is not exactly a right-wing Christian organization.
Dershowitz thinks crimes committed by Trump will be found, but only because anyone who owns big businesses has inadvertently committed crimes.
Obama is proud of the fact that he was never investigated -- well, for one thing, the Democrats obviously weren't out to get him. And he never owned a business. So big deal.
I am not a Trump supporter. But I am seeing the president being mobbed and persecuted.
Suuuuuuure, you're not. :lol:
I definitely think Trump has intentionally broken laws and some of those will likely come to light through this investigation. I'm just not convinced it is going to be the bombshell some are expecting.
What makes you think he has intentionally broken laws? Do you have evidence, or is it just a feeling you get because you hate Trump?
Suuuuuuure, you're not. :lol:
Because I think most billionaire real-estate moguls intentionally break laws.
I definitely think Trump has intentionally broken laws and some of those will likely come to light through this investigation. I'm just not convinced it is going to be the bombshell some are expecting.
Because I think most billionaire real-estate moguls intentionally break laws.
I don't know all the details about this, first of all, because it is so boring, but I have general ideas about it. Democrats are desperate to find something criminal somehow related to the Trump campaign.
...
I am not a Trump supporter. But I am seeing the president being mobbed and persecuted.
I don't know all the details about this, first of all, because it is so boring, but I have general ideas about it. Democrats are desperate to find something criminal somehow related to the Trump campaign.
It doesn't look as if they will find anything. They arrested Roger Stone because somehow he supposedly had something to do with the wikileaks Clinton emails. And he made some kind of wrong statement, maybe because he didn't have a photographic memory for every detail.
Was the Trump campaign hoping to dig up negative information about Clinton? Probably, that is what political campaigns do.
Alan Dershowitz thinks Mueller won't find anything. He also thinks civil liberties are being threatened, regarding the Infowars ban, for example. He thinks this is all political. And the ACLU is not exactly a right-wing Christian organization.
Dershowitz thinks crimes committed by Trump will be found, but only because anyone who owns big businesses has inadvertently committed crimes.
Obama is proud of the fact that he was never investigated -- well, for one thing, the Democrats obviously weren't out to get him. And he never owned a business. So big deal.
I am not a Trump supporter. But I am seeing the president being mobbed and persecuted.
So ... um ... guilty until proven innocent?
I don't know all the details about this, first of all, because it is so boring, but I have general ideas about it. Democrats are desperate to find something criminal somehow related to the Trump campaign.
It doesn't look as if they will find anything. They arrested Roger Stone because somehow he supposedly had something to do with the wikileaks Clinton emails. And he made some kind of wrong statement, maybe because he didn't have a photographic memory for every detail.
Was the Trump campaign hoping to dig up negative information about Clinton? Probably, that is what political campaigns do.
Alan Dershowitz thinks Mueller won't find anything. He also thinks civil liberties are being threatened, regarding the Infowars ban, for example. He thinks this is all political. And the ACLU is not exactly a right-wing Christian organization.
Dershowitz thinks crimes committed by Trump will be found, but only because anyone who owns big businesses has inadvertently committed crimes.
Obama is proud of the fact that he was never investigated -- well, for one thing, the Democrats obviously weren't out to get him. And he never owned a business. So big deal.
I am not a Trump supporter. But I am seeing the president being mobbed and persecuted.
You THINK, you Think, I bet you thought those woman that tried to destroy Kav made you think he was guilty. However there was not a shred of evidence or corroboration to support a word they said. Now Kav is a SCJ
And now you think Trump intentionally broken laws. Do you have an ounce of fact to support your thinking?????
Just asking
That's what I think the people who pushed for this investigation were banking on.
That's what they got on Manafort.
That's what they got on Cohen.
All of the investigation's so-called related "crimes" so far are "process crimes," i.e. lying to investigators...typically about something innocent (Flynn, Papadopoulos) or something forgotten (Stone).
Oh, wait! There is that issue of "campaign finance" problems with paying off people seeking to profit on their story...but that is still not Russian "collusion."
What makes you think he has intentionally broken laws? Do you have evidence, or is it just a feeling you get because you hate Trump?
That's what I think the people who pushed for this investigation were banking on.
That's what they got on Manafort.
That's what they got on Cohen.
All of the investigation's so-called related "crimes" so far are "process crimes," i.e. lying to investigators...typically about something innocent (Flynn, Papadopoulos) or something forgotten (Stone).
Oh, wait! There is that issue of "campaign finance" problems with paying off people seeking to profit on their story...but that is still not Russian "collusion."
I definitely think Trump has intentionally broken laws and some of those will likely come to light through this investigation. I'm just not convinced it is going to be the bombshell some are expecting.
That's right. Even Mueller himself is trying to tamp down the misguided enthusiasm of his Trump-hating deluded supporters. Mueller's best face-saving tactic will be to have his report sealed so nobody ever finds out how little he ever found and how far removed from Trump was what he did find.
That's what I think the people who pushed for this investigation were banking on.
That's what they got on Manafort.
That's what they got on Cohen.
All of the investigation's so-called related "crimes" so far are "process crimes," i.e. lying to investigators...typically about something innocent (Flynn, Papadopoulos) or something forgotten (Stone).
Oh, wait! There is that issue of "campaign finance" problems with paying off people seeking to profit on their story...but that is still not Russian "collusion."
I don’t see why Mueller needs to save face, though. He wasn’t appointed to take Trump down, he was appointed to investigate the matter. If he fulfilled the mandate he was given then he should be proud of his work.
Herr Muller was appointed to investigate the democrat rumor that Trump had colluded with the Russians. He likely found out in the first two months that such a rumor was untrue. What has he been doing ever since? God knows what but he has a lot to hide from now that he has come to the end with no evidence of collusion.
What evidence do you have that Mueller -------> //// likely found out in the first two months that such a rumor was true ? ////// Do you have a link or a copy of Mueller's findings to support your supposition, or are you just stating your biased 'opinion' ?
I don't need to prove Mueller does not have any evidence of Trump/Russian collusion. I'll just wait until he proves it himself.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?