• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The judge said all of them, Trump promised half by today.. and the grand total is ,drum roll, please

MOre evidence that you dont know what you are talking about, as if more evidence were needed. But let me ask you something, what channel do you suggest that conservatives watch? CNN? MSNBC? CBS? ABC? NPR? Who? The reason Fox exists and is so successful is because it is the ONLY network that doesnt have a left wing slant. And that is the reason why you fringe lefties hate it so much. You dont want anybody giving an opinion contrary to your own. Sounds a bit fascist to me. Are you a fascist?

Fascism would be getting all of your news from the state-run media outlet, which is what Fox has become under Trump. Educated people that want the truth get their news from a wide variety of news outlets and don't confine themselves to the one that tells them what they want to hear. CNN or anyone else could literally just quote Trump and report his actions and people like you will scream bias.
 
Fascism would be getting all of your news from the state-run media outlet, which is what Fox has become under Trump. Educated people that want the truth get their news from a wide variety of news outlets and don't confine themselves to the one that tells them what they want to hear. CNN or anyone else could literally just quote Trump and report his actions and people like you will scream bias.

False. And stupid.
 
I'm thinking this judge's order needs to be appealed to a less biased, more reasonable court.

They didn't because this is a blatant violation of both law, and decency, and you'd have to find a judge that was a total wackadoodle to get a ruling in favor of the administration... which would get appealed, and Trump would lose again.
 
We had one or two guys whining about activism.

You need to keep your propaganda current. Republicans love judicial 'activism' now.
 
Once I stopped thinking you guys were adults, this became a comedy forum.

A judge can't make law. Unless the Feds are breaking the law, this judge doesn't have the authority to make this ruling.
 
4 kids.

The judge said over a hundred young children had to be reunited. Trump said they were going to do over 50.

They did 4.

Told ya...

Sadistic and incompetent is one hell of a combination, not to mention violating both our laws and international law.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018...children-deadline-trump-administration-676078

Why all the sudden you’re worried about following the law, isn’t that what Trump was doing to start with (illegal immigrants), I guess you just want to pick the laws you like


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Headline: "Local Man Chops Up Forty Children With Machete."
Reader: "Yeah, well...well what about all the children he didn't chop up??"

Down deep in the story the guy with the machete was a illegal immigrant that had been deported 5 times


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
isn’t that what Trump was doing to start with (illegal immigrants)

No he started by breaking the law.

They said repeatedly they were going to do this to discourage immigration.

Malice aforethought...
 
Well most Trump supporters do consider separating children from their parents and keeping them in cages to be "right".

The news reports the facts, I'm sorry you don't like it. If you'd like to watch reporters repeatedly fellate Trump on everything he does there's still Fox News.

You were fast to bring up Trump, and you forgot to mention Obama did the same thing, did y’all not care about the children then?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You were fast to bring up Trump, and you forgot to mention Obama did the same thing, did y’all not care about the children then?

Mostly, that's false equivalence...

But it's not hard to find differences, if your sole goal isn't to excuse the sadistic incompetence.
 
Seeing as you just lied on two fronts, can I call BS yet. Or do I have to file a complaint with home office?

I half agree with you...First sentence if very subjective, but not totally inaccurate as nearly all Trump supporters will support Trump no matter what even it means putting children in cages.

However, the statement about Fox is completely true.
 
You were fast to bring up Trump, and you forgot to mention Obama did the same thing, did y’all not care about the children then?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Half true, lets be completely honest here people. It was not an Obama policy to literally separate children from their parents...However, Trump, Miller, and company made it a deliberate policy to do so...
 
I half agree with you...First sentence if very subjective, but not totally inaccurate as nearly all Trump supporters will support Trump no matter what even it means putting children in cages.

However, the statement about Fox is completely true.

Seeing as no one was putting children in cages, especially to the extent that the left has been exaggerating. I called BS on such a statement for that very reason. The only time I have seen children put in cages, is either in leftist protest, or during the Obama administration.

Secondly, even Fox has been critical of Trump in the past. Which despite their zealotry does not accrue for being "that" devoted.

I would rather watch Fox, instead of CNN. A company that postulates itself as the most truthful news outlet, despite wearing their bias on the sleeve at all times.

I'll take a Tucker Carlson interview, over Rachel Maddow crying fake tears any day.
 
Should they keep thousands of children from their parents just because one or two might be an alleged child trafficker? How cruel and unusual.


Trump's government kidnapped those children for political gain...and the best solution is to remove that POS in the WH out of office ASAP.

Many Central American migrants slated for deportation are choosing to leave their own children behind in U.S. government shelters,
says an official at the Department of Homeland Security. IT"S THE PARENTS CHOICE TO LEAVE THEIR CHILD!

“A lot of reporters have been complaining and bemoaning that some of the parents have been deported without their kids,”
said Jessica Vaughan, policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies. But, she added:

The parents are willing participants in the criminal act.That is the choice of their parents! The whole point of bringing the kids was
to get the kids into the United States to live with friends or [extended] family. That was always the intended result. The [parents
often will] reunify by coming in illegally on a later date.

This is not a victimless phenomenon. The communities that have had to accommodate the huge number of people who
have been allowed to settle here have seen enormous problems as a result … It is difficult for the schools to absorb
the kids, difficult for social welfare agencies … and [difficult to handle] crime problems.

Up to 500,000 migrants from Central America have been allowed to migrate into the United States since
President Barack Obama loosened the migration enforcement after 2009. Can't have this nonsense repeated,
Trump is nobly attempting to end this one of the three central American countries already has 1/4 of their
entire population residing here I think it's El Salvador.



https://www.breitbart.com/2018-elec...are-leaving-their-children-the-united-states/
 
Great retort. You may think it wise to get all of your news from only one source but most people would call someone stupid and ignorant for doing that.

Thats sort of the point. If you are on the left and refuse to watch Fox news, then you ARE getting all your news from only one source.
 
Thats sort of the point. If you are on the left and refuse to watch Fox news, then you ARE getting all your news from only one source.

No, I get it from dozens of news outlets, in print, internet and TV and from multiple countries in two languages. You literally get your news from one source and one perspective.
 
Back
Top Bottom