• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The huckster denies ever supporting Josh Duggar

Classic damned if you do, damned if you do not. AKA, a BS story designed to make political points off of a terrible event.
 
Classic damned if you do, damned if you do not. AKA, a BS story designed to make political points off of a terrible event.

More like "damned when you do" and then "damned when you deny you did it"

And Huckabee's defense of Josh Duggar, though disgusting, was not a "terrible event"
 
More like "damned when you do" and then "damned when you deny you did it"

And Huckabee's defense of Josh Duggar, though disgusting, was not a "terrible event"

What Josh Duggar did was terrible, and I have not seen to date anything where Huckabee excused his actions.
 
What Josh Duggar did was terrible, and I have not seen to date anything where Huckabee excused his actions.

The issue is not whether Huckabee "excused" his actions. It's whether or not he is now lying when he says he never defended Josh.
 
The issue is not whether Huckabee "excused" his actions. It's whether or not he is now lying when he says he never defended Josh.

Unclear myself if Huckabee "defended Josh" either.
 
Back
Top Bottom