Of course, the question might be" What career'?
The Fraud In “Gungate” Is Real, And Should End Katie Couric’s Career – Bearing Arms
Ladies and gentlemen, Dan Rather had a certain degree of deniability when his producers failed to do their due diligence and vet the so-called “Killian documents” for authenticity. It was a mistake, but still cost four people their jobs at CBS News and tarnished Rather’s lengthy and up until then, respected career.
Yahoo! News anchor and Under the Gun executive producer and narrator Katie Couric cannot off up any plausible deniability at all for her team’s decision to commit what is nothing more or less than fraud.
This project was Couric’s “baby,” and she was responsible for every aspect of the final cut of a heavily-biased documentary which now appears to contain blatant and intentional fraud designed to make the VCDL appear as if they didn’t have an answer to the interviewers questions, when they did indeed have an immediate, detailed, and rational response from three members of the group which went to so far as to cite law and Supreme Court decisions on prior restraint, pointing out the sort of “pre-crime” laws championed by gun control supporters is both Orwellian and blatantly unconstitutional.
Katie Couric’s “Gungate” was intentional, willful, and malicious fraud, and should in Couric’s immediate termination and her being treated as a pariah for the rest of her life.
The controversy is about one edit in an interview and the director has apologized publicly for it Katie Couric stands by 'Under the Gun' as director apologizes for misleading edit - May. 25, 2016 but, you're right, Katie has no career...
The director's apology was in fact a non-apology.
The whole thing is a tempest in a tea pot. The upshot is, I hadn't even heard of the documentary until this thread tried to make hay about it.
Couric Owes Apology for Portraying Gun Owners as Idiots
Erik Wemple, Wash Post
I saw that: that's what I posted. It's still a tempest in a tea pot and a lot of right-wing gun owners ARE idiots; so what's your point?
I saw that: that's what I posted. It's still a tempest in a tea pot and a lot of right-wing gun owners ARE idiots; so what's your point?
The controversy is about one edit in an interview and the director has apologized publicly for it Katie Couric stands by 'Under the Gun' as director apologizes for misleading edit - May. 25, 2016 but, you're right, Katie has no career...
Death of a Journalist's Career, by Katie Couric
With Foreward written by: Dan Rather
It was a lie. A deliberate, carefully crafted and purposeful lie.I saw that: that's what I posted. It's still a tempest in a tea pot and a lot of right-wing gun owners ARE idiots; so what's your point?
Journalists have a responsibility to report the truth. As far as I'm concerned she lost every shred of credibility she had and should be fired... in addition to the retraction and apology, of course.So you think a lame apology is enough to correct the problem. A complete and unconditional retraction followed by a front page apology is what she needs to do.
I saw that: that's what I posted. It's still a tempest in a tea pot and a lot of right-wing gun owners ARE idiots; so what's your point?
And a lot of left wing gun grabbers are bigots. What is your point?
The controversy is about one edit in an interview and the director has apologized publicly for it Katie Couric stands by 'Under the Gun' as director apologizes for misleading edit - May. 25, 2016 but, you're right, Katie has no career...
"Left wing gun grabbers are bigot"... Got any examples?
I saw that: that's what I posted. It's still a tempest in a tea pot and a lot of right-wing gun owners ARE idiots; so what's your point?
The constant attacks on any who want to pursue their 2nd amendment rights and vilifying any who are not them.
As are Left wingers are idiots in general, which is why people like Couric can get away with something as dishonest as this
What a lying sack of ****. It's exactly what she intended.
From the link you posted:
"I never intended to make anyone look bad and I apologize if anyone felt that way," director Stephanie Soechtig said after conservative blogs and media outlets exposed the editing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?