• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Feminist Commune (1 Viewer)

When I lived in a commune, the only person who was really fat was a man-hating lesbian who would yell at you if you didn't use the word "herstory" for history.

The rest of us were burning too many calories on strenuous activities that involved each other to get fat.

You mean like swimming? :mrgreen:
 
So I Googled and learned about "Femquility." If you're male and want to be a pet, this idyllic commune in the making might just be for you.

FemDom EcoVillage

Real men, naturally, need not apply. Real women either. :lamo
 
So I Googled and learned about "Femquility." If you're male and want to be a pet, this idyllic commune in the making might just be for you.

FemDom EcoVillage

Real men, naturally, need not apply. Real women either. :lamo

The queen seems weird. That's nothing like what I had in mind.
 
So I Googled and learned about "Femquility." If you're male and want to be a pet, this idyllic commune in the making might just be for you.

FemDom EcoVillage

Real men, naturally, need not apply. Real women either. :lamo


I wish I hadn't read that right after supper. I think I need some Maalox.
 
I wish I hadn't read that right after supper. I think I need some Maalox.

You know, I actually did think about posting a warning.
 
I wish I hadn't read that right after supper. I think I need some Maalox.

The Queen is a classic example of domination confused with sadism. There's a huge difference between the two.
 
The Queen is a classic example of domination confused with sadism. There's a huge difference between the two.



Ah yeah, whatever dude.
 
I think you are correct.

Heck, I'm at a stage in my life where I'd enjoy not having to take charge, I love and am good with children and am very loyal to those I'm committed to. I've stated early on in this thread that I wouldn't be opposed to being a part of the feminist commune...given that my conditions could be met. Unfortunately, since I'm a conservative, I'm unqualified.

So it goes.


A couple times I've mentioned that we don't know what she looks like. If not too old and looks not bad, of course there are men who would be interested for what she wants and would offer (I assume a she, no reason not to and it doesn't matter who the real person is anyway -just the words.)

A commune of little demand to produce income, run by women who make all the big decisions. If the man is polite, nice, mostly listens and nods in agreement often, he gets to have sex with lots of women without condoms wanting to have babies by the men. He will not be burdened with decisions. If he tries to take too much charge of things or gets to demanding, the women will put him out. Of course, he also could leave whenever he does. And if he leaves either way he doesn't have to worry about child support or the children because the women will take care of the children and the don't know who is the bio-father anyway.

If she and the other women are attractive, there are at least 10 million men interested. Whether they or the setup would work out is hard to say. It would be necessary to continue to recruit younger women. BUT commune - cults do succeed. They don't tend to last a real long time, but some do.

Not something I would go for, though. In pre-relationship/marriage life, that is far too much effort for sex. Sex easy to get. After, that is not a relationship setting I would want. However, I can see that as being enticing to some men.
 
What a strange thread. Is this woman saying that men are nothing but big babies? :lol:
 
A couple times I've mentioned that we don't know what she looks like. If not too old and looks not bad, of course there are men who would be interested for what she wants and would offer (I assume a she, no reason not to and it doesn't matter who the real person is anyway -just the words.)

A commune of little demand to produce income, run by women who make all the big decisions. If the man is polite, nice, mostly listens and nods in agreement often, he gets to have sex with lots of women without condoms wanting to have babies by the men. He will not be burdened with decisions. If he tries to take too much charge of things or gets to demanding, the women will put him out. Of course, he also could leave whenever he does. And if he leaves either way he doesn't have to worry about child support or the children because the women will take care of the children and the don't know who is the bio-father anyway.

If she and the other women are attractive, there are at least 10 million men interested. Whether they or the setup would work out is hard to say. It would be necessary to continue to recruit younger women. BUT commune - cults do succeed. They don't tend to last a real long time, but some do.

Not something I would go for, though. In pre-relationship/marriage life, that is far too much effort for sex. Sex easy to get. After, that is not a relationship setting I would want. However, I can see that as being enticing to some men.

Oh, my motivation isn't about the sex...though that is a consideration and a plus. I get plenty of sex now with very little commitment toward or from my partners.
 
What a strange thread. Is this woman saying that men are nothing but big babies? :lol:

ummm...

In a sense, she is, but she does want their help making little babies and, of course, she wants the fun she'll get doing so.
 
ummm...

In a sense, she is, but she does want their help making little babies and, of course, she wants the fun she'll get doing so.

LOL! She wants man babies AND real babies? :shock:
 
I thought communes went out with the 60s, but that's before I was born, so what do I know? :shrug: I've never seen or heard of a commune in my local area.
 
Oh, my motivation isn't about the sex...though that is a consideration and a plus. I get plenty of sex now with very little commitment toward or from my partners.

Being relieved of responsibilities? I can see guys definitely going for that.
 
Being relieved of responsibilities? I can see guys definitely going for that.

I've spent all my life being responsible. I deserve a break.
 
I've spent all my life being responsible. I deserve a break.

So you want a woman to treat you like a baby? :lol: Does that include diapers?
 
So you want a woman to treat you like a baby? :lol: Does that include diapers?

Oh, I've done a number of kinky things over the years...compared to some of them, diapers would be kind of tame.
 
I've spent all my life being responsible. I deserve a break.

I think quite a few men feel that way. Being expected to make all decisions, make it all work - and then responsible if it doesn't - if that is the relationship/marriage expectation - gets tiresome for some men. Its a burden more than a power trip for those who aren't power trippers.
 
Oh, I've done a number of kinky things over the years...compared to some of them, diapers would be kind of tame.

Interesting! :lamo
 
Oh, I've done a number of kinky things over the years...compared to some of them, diapers would be kind of tame.


"Kinky"... LOL.

I've never done anything "kinky."

Oh, I dunno, that's a pretty broad word. Tell us more about "kinky" :lol:
 
"Kinky"... LOL.

I've never done anything "kinky." Know alot of people who have/do.

Kinky is totally subjective, and from some of your posts I have a hard time believing that anyway. :lol:
 
"Kinky"... LOL.

I've never done anything "kinky."

Oh, I dunno, that's a pretty broad word. Tell us more about "kinky" :lol:

Well...there was that one time I was sharing a house with two girls and we ended up with both of them tied to a king sized bed. I started with an ostrich feather and progressed, little by little, to a belt. Nothing really violent or painful, though.

I should add that pot and tequila sunrises had a lot to do with it.
 
Kinky is totally subjective, and from some of your posts I have a hard time believing that anyway. :lol:

Touche' ! :lol:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom