• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The FBI is reopening its Clinton email probe

Republicans are getting desperate as the chances of their orange messiah winning the presidency looks extremely slim less than two weeks before election day.

If only right wingers weren't such idiots and voted for Kasich, they would have gotten a chance to have a GOP president in 2017. Clinton and the Dems I'm sure are thankful for the stupidity of the GOP primary voters.
 
Puigb said:
Republicans are getting desperate as the chances of their orange messiah winning the presidency looks extremely slim less than two weeks before election day.

If only right wingers weren't such idiots and voted for Kasich, they would have gotten a chance to have a GOP president in 2017. Clinton and the Dems I'm sure are thankful for the stupidity of the GOP primary voters.
Click to expand...

Clinton DEMANDS that the FBI reveal whats in these Emails ?

She knows whats in those Emails. So, whats stopping her from calling a Press conference and revealing the information herself ?
 
Perotista said:
No. But if the history of the Obama DOJ is any indication, one will be coming. It's like I said many times, the Obama DOJ is all about protecting and defending Democratic and in this case, Hillary Clinton. What's the best way now since the so called sex tape has run its course then an indictment against Trump. Or at the very least a suit filed by one or more of these women, perhaps dealing with Trump U, who knows? Just going by the Obama DOJ history.
Click to expand...

I agree that Obama has used the DOJ as a political weapon
 
Weiner may have turned State’s evidence against Hillary— he was facing 15 years in prison over sexting a minor..
 
bubbabgone said:
Actually, one of the provisions in that Law doesn't seem to require intent ...
Click to expand...
Actually, it does....


"...Title 18, United States Code, Section 793 on it's face makes it a felony to cause national defense information to be removed, lost, stolen, or destroyed through gross negligence. Even at the time the statute was passed, there were concerns in Congress about the inclusion of this provision. Additionally, with respect to this statute, there are concerns about the constitutional implications of criminalizing such conduct without requiring the government to prove that the person knew he or she was doing something wrong, which is reflected in the Justice Department's history in charging this specific subsection of the statute (18 U.S.C. & 793(f). Our understanding is the Department has only charged one person with mishandling national defense information through gross negligence in the 99-year history of the statute, and in that case, the charge was dismissed when the defendant pled guilty to making false statements in the violation of 18 U.S.C. &793 1001. Moreover, in that case, there were indications of espionage and disloyalty to the United States. As the Director testified, he believed that to prosecute Secretary Clinton or others within the scope of the investigation for gross negligence would be inconsistent with how the Department has interpreted and applied the statute since Congress enacted it.

...The term "extremely careless" was intended to be a common sense way of describing the actions of Secretary Clinton and her colleagues. The Director did not equate "extreme carelessness" withe the legal standard of "gross negligence" that is required by the statute. In this case, the FBI assessed that the facts did not support a recommendation to prosecute her or others within the scope of the investigation for gross negligence.,,,,"

http://democrats.oversight.house.go...files/documents/Herring to JEC 8.16.2016.pdf​
 
AlbqOwl said:
They recovered some yes. But not the 33,000 that were intentionally deleted in a way that they could not be retrieved by any method.
Click to expand...

Most were recovered from other email accounts. But still...only 30 work related emails out of the thousands recovered highly suggests there's really nothing left to see that we don't already know.
 
volsrock said:
Weiner may have turned State’s evidence against Hillary— he was facing 15 years in prison over sexting a minor..
Click to expand...

Which has nothing to do with Hillary.
 
JackA said:
A little perspective please. All of the meticulous searching has failed so far to turn up a single email that jeopardized national security. Unlike her opponent, Hillary stole no one's money, she libeled no one, she sexually assaulted no one. She gained no political advantage from using a private server. She got nothing from it, nothing at all, other than a convenience in doing her job. She was not "corrupt" or "crooked" whether or not a classified document slipped through, and it is nauseating to hear a seventy year old pervert who considers his daughter "a piece of ass" try to take the moral high ground.
Click to expand...

1) It doesn't make a difference.

2) Mishandling classified material, intentionally, or not; national security threat, or not is a crime.
 
volsrock said:
Clinton knows whats in them...why wont she just tell us
Click to expand...

Would you know what was in emails may have been sent from the laptop of a disgraced Congressman years ago?
 
Last edited:
volsrock said:
Weiner may have turned State’s evidence against Hillary— he was facing 15 years in prison over sexting a minor..
Click to expand...

yeah. and the emails may have nothing whatsoever to do with anything. They might even be copies of emails already examined by the FBI.

Meanwhile, back in Realityland, are you for a woman's right to choose, or are you with Trump?
Do you believe that NASA and every other nationally-recognized scientific organization on the planet is correct about global warming, or are you with Trump?
Do you believe in a person's basic dignity, or are you with Trump?
 
Last edited:
apdst said:
1) It doesn't make a difference.
2) Mishandling classified material, intentionally, or not; national security threat, or not is a crime.
Click to expand...

The FBI has determined that the facts of this case suggest otherwise. But hey, I'm sure you're a much better expert on what constitutes a crime than the FBI. :roll:
 
volsrock said:
Julian ASSANGE says the next email leak will lead to the arrest of Hillary CLINTON!
Click to expand...

Oh COOL! Then we'd have the lying racist misogynist egotist Putin-loving Donald Trump as president! Wow, that would be awesome! because Trump knows so much more than the generals and the economists and the scientists and the doctors and anyone knows about anything because he's so AWESOME!

Finally! We'd have an honest-to-goodness racist in the White House and not some piddly dink who just pretends to be racist to get your votes during the elections! Just think of all the p**sy the President could grab! Man!
 
jpn said:
Oh COOL! Then we'd have the lying racist misogynist egotist Putin-loving Donald Trump as president! Wow, that would be awesome! because Trump knows so much more than the generals and the economists and the scientists and the doctors and anyone knows about anything because he's so AWESOME!

Finally! We'd have an honest-to-goodness racist in the White House and not some piddly dink who just pretends to be racist to get your votes during the elections! Just think of all the p**sy the President could grab! Man!
Click to expand...

Too bad Bill is not chummy anymore, he could have been so much help on corralling interns.
 
Some day the "liberal media" will learn that ANY story that originates from hacks like Jason Chaffetz never turn out to have a lick of substance.

Your "liberal media" at work on the latest non-scandal:

blog_fbi_weiner_clinton_emails.jpg


Obviously the fix is in against Trump. It's so obvious. No way we can trust the outcome of the election. :roll:
 
Last edited:
Anyone who dreams that this will have a negative effect on President Hillary Clinton will be disappointed by the way that it plays out.
 
apdst said:
They found something new and it's big. Comey knows he better do something, or when this goes public, he might go to prison.
Click to expand...

From what I hear, Comey was facing what might be best termed an "uprising" from agents in his chain of command. Many career SAs and higher-people who had been with the agency for years if not decades were pissed at the Comey claim that no prosecutor would take the case (which also was BS).
 
jpn said:
Oh COOL! Then we'd have the lying racist misogynist egotist Putin-loving Donald Trump as president! Wow, that would be awesome! because Trump knows so much more than the generals and the economists and the scientists and the doctors and anyone knows about anything because he's so AWESOME!

Finally! We'd have an honest-to-goodness racist in the White House and not some piddly dink who just pretends to be racist to get your votes during the elections! Just think of all the p**sy the President could grab! Man!
Click to expand...

yeah that really is far worse than an obvious FELON and treasonous lying bitch of a candidate. NOT

Hillary is beyond corrupt, she's a ever-widening criminal conspiracy
 
Casper said:
One or the other will end up ripping that scab right of,f and the nation will gain speed right on down the hill it has been going down for a while now.
Click to expand...

I have never been a guy that avoided an problem because it might be hard. Maybe our people have become too comfortable and need a shake up. Right now the average citizen seems to be thinking with their ass. Look at the two candidates we have right now. If this is the best we have then we suck.
 
Mr Person said:
Why would you change the subject?





This simply has nothing to do with any alleged misconduct by Hillary.
Click to expand...

I didn't. I provided you context and you refuse to absorb it. Your lack of comprehension of the matter or context is your problem, not mine. I can't make you think.
 
jpn said:
Wow, you must be really impressed with Hillary's memory! To keep track of tens of thousands of emails! What a wonder!!!
Click to expand...

Hell, she can't even remember how to tell top secret information from casual email and people still want to vote for her.
 
Last edited:
NonoBadDog said:
Hell, she can't even remember how to tell top secret information from casual email and people still want to vote for her.
Click to expand...

And she openly admits it to boot. :lamo
 
jpn said:
I guess you didn't notice that the FBI has said nothing about "reopening the investigation."
And if they do, the odds that three emails are going to change the long, considered conclusion of an agency that examined thousands of emails.

The Clinton campaign is demanding that the FBI reveal the contents of the emails. Sounds like they aren't too scared.
Click to expand...

She knows damn well Comey can't release material that is being investigated. It is propaganda that she hopes the idiot public will buy into.
 
NonoBadDog said:
Man, go figure.
Click to expand...

And not one Hillary voter cares either. They're like that idiotic employer that gives the guy that can't even do his job right a raise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom