• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The FACTS of COVID are that it is an East Coast problem in Democrat strongholds

Often the counter point to his poor arguments are found in the very data he cites, which is why reading the entirety of a cited article helps prevent getting owned by it.
He does self debunk a lot
 
You can't figure out how the cannabis industry will create jobs? Really? There will be hundreds of dispensaries that employ people...if there are 500 of them and each one employs 20 people = 10,000. Then there are all the people who will farm and grow cannabis, the suppliers of other materials, i.e. for edibles, tincture, packaging, security, government jobs to regulate the industry etc. etc.




Your "point" about how homeless and unemployed people will afford to buy it is ridiculous and a straw man BS argument. It's obvious you have no idea about anything related to cannabis. Do you think people will buy weed instead of buying food and paying for housing? You probably do - LOL!



I searched your posts (ever try it?) and there isn't a link. You either have memory problems or you're not telling the truth. If it's as simple as a link why don't you just share it again from your post that contained it? Regardless, why not name 5 social programs? You're being dishonest because you can't back up what you wrote, per usual.




Oh really? What percentage of the population fall into that category? You're again making accusations out of CONTEXT. How anyone can believe that people don't want jobs and prefer to live on unemployment is naive if I'm being kind. Unemployment isn't forever and in the new stimulus bill the expanded unemployment runs out in September. I showed you (you probably didn't read it) or forgot that the average SNAP recipient gets $1.39 per meal per person. That, to you, is incentive to not have a job? LOL!


No, I am not that's ridiculous. You would feel that way because ALL YOU CARE ABOUT IS MONEY. I have no issue paying whatever taxes I owe. It's my civic duty and it is what it is. You're clueless to what I think and believe so stop writing untruths about what pisses me off.


You keep saying all I am concerned about is money, you couldn't be more wrong, this is about personal responsibility and not the liberal ideology. This is about putting common sense and civility back into this country not the following which is your ideology. It is truly stunning how you buy rhetoric and ignore reality. Liberal results never match liberal rhetoric.

We have a President with dementia, an ex-call girl for Vice President, a transvestite overseeing Health and Human Services, a President's son who is a crackhead and human-trafficking pedophile who money-laundered millions from other countries sharing half with his dad, the same crackhead's buddy is now in the Department of Justice. A guy who was sleeping with a Red Chinese spy is on our House Homeland Security Committee. We are borrowing most of our money from Red China. Thousands of illegal immigrants are pouring across our southern border for our jobs, healthcare and social security benefits. The Democrats are still focusing on destroying a former President who is not even there anymore -- and all this with 50,000 jobs lost in just the past two months. And teenage boys can legally shower in teenage girl’s locker rooms.
 
Your concession is noted. Again, the link was provided for the entire body of work which goes into detail and provides all of the "math and science". Now the obvious thing to do is read it and make a counter point, but since you can't be bothered and have offered up nothing more than conjecture to support your claim, the failure has been all yours from the very beginning and "to date".

I have not claimed I've succeeded; what I (and others) have done is challenged the obvious flaws in your original premise and the bad ones you formed in the endless deflections which followed. You continue to repeat the incorrect statement that masks alone are the only measure in the prevention measures cited not only by the CDC, but other medical professionals. You have proven to be quite successful at failing to respond with one salient counterpoint. Well done!
Vagaries work with the true believers only.
 
You can't figure out how the cannabis industry will create jobs? Really? There will be hundreds of dispensaries that employ people...if there are 500 of them and each one employs 20 people = 10,000. Then there are all the people who will farm and grow cannabis, the suppliers of other materials, i.e. for edibles, tincture, packaging, security, government jobs to regulate the industry etc. etc.




Your "point" about how homeless and unemployed people will afford to buy it is ridiculous and a straw man BS argument. It's obvious you have no idea about anything related to cannabis. Do you think people will buy weed instead of buying food and paying for housing? You probably do - LOL!



I searched your posts (ever try it?) and there isn't a link. You either have memory problems or you're not telling the truth. If it's as simple as a link why don't you just share it again from your post that contained it? Regardless, why not name 5 social programs? You're being dishonest because you can't back up what you wrote, per usual.




Oh really? What percentage of the population fall into that category? You're again making accusations out of CONTEXT. How anyone can believe that people don't want jobs and prefer to live on unemployment is naive if I'm being kind. Unemployment isn't forever and in the new stimulus bill the expanded unemployment runs out in September. I showed you (you probably didn't read it) or forgot that the average SNAP recipient gets $1.39 per meal per person. That, to you, is incentive to not have a job? LOL!


No, I am not that's ridiculous. You would feel that way because ALL YOU CARE ABOUT IS MONEY. I have no issue paying whatever taxes I owe. It's my civic duty and it is what it is. You're clueless to what I think and believe so stop writing untruths about what pisses me off.

Any idea who funds this kind of bs?

California county helps fund universal basic income program restricted to women of color | Fox News
 
I'm curious to see how the cannabis agriculture will grow in the state, because that's a trickier proposition given the climate here. Some of the states out west have much more favorable climates for this than we do here in the northeast. That's not to say it can't be done, but requires much more in the way of specialized equipment to do so (greenhouses, hydroponics, lighting etc.) and that limits who can get into the industry versus other places where there is less overhead.

There's no doubt in my mind that on the retail side, this will definitely allow for a lot of small businesses to start up, and with that the jobs that will required to operate them. I suspect this will be the largest area of growth; be it dispensaries or hookah style bars etc. It's pretty safe to say the customer base will extend well beyond the homeless and unemployed; the latter was a rather odd association to the growth of a new industry.
Over around the Buffalo area they have already started growing it. they have been growing Hemp for the last two years or so so they had a head start ,
when they started growing Hemp they were setting it up to do a change over asap when it became legal
so they are already started
Have a nice day
 
We have a President with dementia, an ex-call girl for Vice President, a transvestite overseeing Health and Human Services, a President's son who is a crackhead and human-trafficking pedophile who money-laundered millions from other countries sharing half with his dad, the same crackhead's buddy is now in the Department of Justice. A guy who was sleeping with a Red Chinese spy is on our House Homeland Security Committee. We are borrowing most of our money from Red China. Thousands of illegal immigrants are pouring across our southern border for our jobs, healthcare and social security benefits. The Democrats are still focusing on destroying a former President who is not even there anymore -- and all this with 50,000 jobs lost in just the past two months. And teenage boys can legally shower in teenage girl’s locker rooms.
Whoa! What a rant that's filled with your hate and irrelevant BS. A transvestite? You obviously no NOTHING about transgender people. What difference does it make what a person identifies their gender as? You've exposed yourself again as a hater who discriminates against someone and your words are outrageously homophobic. You call the VEEP a whore. You call our President as mentally incompetent when your posts here regularly display significant memory issues. "Red Chinese" is another great racist comment. We're not borrowing most of our money from China.


RankCountryU.S. Debt Holdings
#1China$1.11 trillion
#2Japan$1.06 trillion
#3Brazil$307 billion
#4United Kingdom$301 billion

Jobs lost? NOT TRUE:


The U.S. economy created more jobs than expected in February...

You have shown your true colors again! This is one of the nastiest posts you've ever written and you revealed how prejudiced you are against people who are different than you are.
 
What does your link have to do with Cannabis? Did you even read what you posted? 88% of the funding is from a private foundation and it's for 125 women of color with a child under 18. The total amount is $3.4M with only $400K coming from the local government which equals $133 per month per woman for two years...It's an experiment to see how this type of action lifts people out of poverty. You're against private foundations helping their fellow Americans? If a $400K government investment takes 125 people out of poverty that's a great way to invest in our future.

To answer your inappropriate question I know exactly who funded this program. Apparently you don't or why would you embarrass yourself like this?
 
What does your link have to do with Cannabis? Did you even read what you posted? 88% of the funding is from a private foundation and it's for 125 women of color with a child under 18. The total amount is $3.4M with only $400K coming from the local government which equals $133 per month per woman for two years...It's an experiment to see how this type of action lifts people out of poverty. You're against private foundations helping their fellow Americans? If a $400K government investment takes 125 people out of poverty that's a great way to invest in our future.

To answer your inappropriate question I know exactly who funded this program. Apparently you don't or why would you embarrass yourself like this?
Another liberal who thinks it's fine to discriminate. Can you just imagine the furor if this money was given only to white people??
 
Another liberal who thinks it's fine to discriminate. Can you just imagine the furor if this money was given only to white people??
Try hard to see beyond race...this program is meant to target 125 people who are part of 400 women at a private foundation. The foundation is funding 88% of the costs. They got Marin County to contribute 12%. It's an experimental program and if it were all white under the same circumstances or any other combo I would be fine with it because it's almost entirely funded privately. Your race straw man is what people who are prejudiced do when they react out of context. If it were 100% funded I would say it's inappropriate.
 
Vagaries work with the true believers only.

There was nothing vague in the link I provided. Clearly, you believe your own failed arguments too strongly; that's often the flaw with belief systems.
tumblr_p964e1wuWi1we0p6lo1_r1_500.gifv
 
Try hard to see beyond race...this program is meant to target 125 people who are part of 400 women at a private foundation. The foundation is funding 88% of the costs. They got Marin County to contribute 12%. It's an experimental program and if it were all white under the same circumstances or any other combo I would be fine with it because it's almost entirely funded privately. Your race straw man is what people who are prejudiced do when they react out of context. If it were 100% funded I would say it's inappropriate.
I don't care if Marin County in Kommunist Kalifornia is giving them 12 cents. When is it ever OK to give TAX money that excludes members of a certain race?
 
There was nothing vague in the link I provided. Clearly, you believe your own failed arguments too strongly; that's often the flaw with belief systems.
tumblr_p964e1wuWi1we0p6lo1_r1_500.gifv
What is/was the link intended to do? Did you not see my post asking this? It is all well and good, El Chupacabra to post fancy cherry picked charts and articles from some left winger and then tell the poster to go fetch and quite another to do the work and explain in detail the facts contained in said charts or article that support your belief system.
 
little 2yos are gonna grow up and study this era and vtext to each other on the zPhones and say stuff like...

"Cruh, can you believe that there were dumb asses who thought that Pandemic cared about location?? That's just molecule-dead cra cra."

Consider too, that 103 years after the Spanish Flu, we are here arguing some of the same points the people back then were. The more things change, the more they remain the same.
;)
 
What is/was the link intended to do? Did you not see my post asking this? It is all well and good, El Chupacabra to post fancy cherry picked charts and articles from some left winger and then tell the poster to go fetch and quite another to do the work and explain in detail the facts contained in said charts or article that support your belief system.
In other words you won't believe anything that dismisses your nonsense arguments no matter if they're true and you claim that religious zealots are blindly loyal? It seems to me that your blind loyalty has even less facts then the religious people who believe in miracles...
 
I don't care if Marin County in Kommunist Kalifornia is giving them 12 cents. When is it ever OK to give TAX money that excludes members of a certain race?
Out of context per usual. You just don't like helping others under any circumstances. Nice!
 
Consider too, that 103 years after the Spanish Flu, we are here arguing some of the same points the people back then were. The more things change, the more they remain the same.
;)
THAT was a pandemic. This is not.
 
In other words you won't believe anything that dismisses your nonsense arguments no matter if they're true and you claim that religious zealots are blindly loyal? It seems to me that your blind loyalty has even less facts then the religious people who believe in miracles...
Nope. I am busy. Links should be used as confirmation of facts, not opinions. The link should the be carefully read by the poster who excerpts out the salient points that the poster feels validates his dogma.

Then, if the reader so chooses to take his valuable time to read that link to confirm or deny the posters premises, he can do that. No one has time to jump around and go through hoops and critique a link or chart that a poster slaps up with the intent to feign confirmation of his biases hoping that the reader won't go there and then if he does the poster can offer a myriad of excuses such as that wasn't the part of the article or chart he was referring to, or that the reader didn't look at the red squirrel in the link, or (fill in the blanks)

I hope this helps the DP posters here become a better debaters because your group needs better talent and training.
 
Out of context per usual. You just don't like helping others under any circumstances. Nice!
Discrimination is against the law when a government entity or employer does it.

You know this.
 
What is/was the link intended to do?

It was posted so you can read the details on a study conducted around pandemic protocols and their efficacy.

Did you not see my post asking this? It is all well and good,

You whinge about "math and science", yet when it is given to you in full to review, you then bow out with tl;dr. Your master class in self owning is quite entertaining, I'll give you that.

El Chupacabra to post fancy cherry picked charts and articles from some left winger and then tell the poster to go fetch and quite another to do the work and explain in detail the facts contained in said charts or article that support your belief system.

If you're referring to the charts I posted in the other thread in which you are flailing, I explained why I selected the states in question, and the source of those charts is the CDC. You are free to select which ever states you wish to compare. The article I provided is from the National Academy of Science, so I'm not quite sure what makes them "left winger". What's even funnier is it's not a very long read, and you make it sound as if I asked you to read a research paper the length of War and Peace. You've also resorted to attacking the messenger rather than debating the merits of the article.

qbDlp8.gif
 
In other words you won't believe anything that dismisses your nonsense arguments no matter if they're true and you claim that religious zealots are blindly loyal? It seems to me that your blind loyalty has even less facts then the religious people who believe in miracles...

It's another fine case of someone projecting.
 
THAT was a pandemic. This is not.

Odd. We are about 110,000 deaths away from reaching the number of deaths as the Spanish Flu. Can you name another pandemic that impacted the US this severely in a short span of time since then?
 
It was posted so you can read the details on a study conducted around pandemic protocols and their efficacy.



You whinge about "math and science", yet when it is given to you in full to review, you then bow out with tl;dr. Your master class in self owning is quite entertaining, I'll give you that.



If you're referring to the charts I posted in the other thread in which you are flailing, I explained why I selected the states in question, and the source of those charts is the CDC. You are free to select which ever states you wish to compare. The article I provided is from the National Academy of Science, so I'm not quite sure what makes them "left winger". What's even funnier is it's not a very long read, and you make it sound as if I asked you to read a research paper the length of War and Peace. You've also resorted to attacking the messenger rather than debating the merits of the article.

qbDlp8.gif
Quite fascinating to watch so many posts that pretend to say something but don't.
 
Back
Top Bottom