• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Confederate Flag

I don't see it that way. That confederate flag was good enough for my great grandpa in the Spanish American War, my grandpa in WWI France, my Dad in the Pacific during WWII, myself in Vietnam, Laos and guarding the East German Border and my Grandson in Afghanistan. Seems my whole family was used. That's okay. We served so you and your like can destroy.

That's bull****. I've not insulted you so I have no idea why you had to make this personal. Thought you were better than that crap. I was trying to have a civil conversation.

FWIW, my goal here isn't to destroy anything except perhaps the last vestiges of racism and white supremacy in this area. I love the South and love the people, warts and all, including on me, and don't want to live anywhere else. So why do you think that disagreeing with you on this means I want to destroy what I love? My hope is doing like I do helps us all get over these petty differences.
 
Sorry, we ain't going to let go of our flag,maybe the second time we don't lose, I'm willing to give it a try.but remember us southern red necks got plenty of money, and guns. Just saying y'all need to think this through. We won't be using squirrel guns this time.
But look I'll say I'm sorry ,there was slavery it was wrong, things were different in 1800's, we don't have slavery now.

The problems in the South with race didn't end with slavery, sad to say. Jim Crow was still the law of the land when I was a youngster.
 
That's bull****. I've not insulted you so I have no idea why you had to make this personal. Thought you were better than that crap. I was trying to have a civil conversation.

FWIW, my goal here isn't to destroy anything except perhaps the last vestiges of racism and white supremacy in this area. I love the South and love the people, warts and all, including on me, and don't want to live anywhere else. So why do you think that disagreeing with you on this means I want to destroy what I love? My hope is doing like I do helps us all get over these petty differences.

I had a busy day yesterday and was thinking about what you said. For some it does come down to one side trying to destroy what the other side holds dear. As long as outsiders stay out, it doesn't give me a feeling of being pushed or forced, I don't care what stays or goes. It's the same as I get mad when I see 10 million dollars flowing into our CD-6 from California to influence or buy the special election we had in CD-6. Who is elected as their Representative should be left to the people of CD-6, not someone from California.

Same for the statues and flags. And yes, it comes down to, especially with all these folks pouring in from outside whichever community that they are trying to force the community involved to do exactly what the outsiders want. In this case destroy the statues or flags. Then it becomes a fight. Normal people, like who don't care usually one way or the other become outraged. That is if you consider me normal. Maybe I should say a lot of people.

Why should I care what happens in Charlottesville, Lexington, Ky or where ever. It really none of my business. It also isn't anyone's business except those who live in or reside in Charlottesville or Lexington. You shouldn't have a say, I shouldn't have a say, those from Louisiana who came to march shouldn't have a say and neither those from Pennsylvania who came to counter protest should have a say.

You equate these things to slavery, others don't. So perhaps there is no solution, no meetings of the minds. One side wants them all down, the other wants them to stay. I'll side with Andrew Young, symbols aren't that important. Unless one side makes them the most important thing. It's what's in a man's heart, leave the symbols alone, they are dying out on their own anyway. One at a time, peacefully, without any rancor. Hardening the opposition heart, getting his hackles up ready for a fight, that isn't going to help people get along. That isn't going to help cure the race problem. That isn't going to make life better for blacks or whomever and it isn't going to improve their standard of living. It isn't going to bring down their crime rate or make their neighborhoods safe.

It isn't going to solve a thing except harden everyone's hearts that are involved. As long as their are some who view the attack on these statues and flags as wanton destruction by the other side, there will be no meeting of the minds. You can destroy all the symbols, ban them, make all them illegal, but not one heart will be changed or soften, quite the opposite. Andrew Young recognized this. It will also make some folks who were basically neutral on this whole thing take a fighting position against it. I'm your prime example. Nothing is solved, the problem remains, it just goes underground, festers there and is hidden from site. But those who wanted the statues and flags down do feel better because there are no longer any symbols. They think they accomplished something and they feel great about that. I don't think they accomplished a thing, except harden hearts, perhaps got more people to oppose them, abet covertly, it didn't solve the problem. It really doesn't even attempt to cure it.

I said my piece. Two days ago it did seem to me that you were out to destroy. Out to fight the civil war all over again even though it's been over for 150 years. Let time take care of the symbols, peacefully and quietly with no outsiders interfering or trying to force a community to do their bidding. They are disappearing, slowly, but they are being taken down peacefully and without any media attention. New generations see things differently than older generations. Me and Andrew Young are quite old.
 
Pride in what? Betraying their country? Viciously attacking those who chose not to join their movement, when supposedly the movement was all about being allowed to choose things like that?

You realize that this also describes the Revolutionary War, as well, yes?
 
Sorry, we ain't going to let go of our flag,maybe the second time we don't lose, I'm willing to give it a try.but remember us southern red necks got plenty of money, and guns. Just saying y'all need to think this through. We won't be using squirrel guns this time.
But look I'll say I'm sorry ,there was slavery it was wrong, things were different in 1800's, we don't have slavery now.
There was a poster here from Houston some time back who was as strident as you are, if not more, about giving secesh another go.

I wonder if he feels that way today.

Wonder.
 
There was a poster here from Houston some time back who was as strident as you are, if not more, about giving secesh another go.

I wonder if he feels that way today.

Wonder.

No, you miss understand, I don't want that, but if they try to take my heritage away


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
There is no "state's right" to own other human beings. None whatsoever. The fact that people would actually have a problem with the federal government telling them they couldn't do that is utterly disgusting; the fact that people still think that celebrating the murder of US soldiers and sailors is an ok and decent thing to do, even more so.

Pride in what? Betraying their country? Viciously attacking those who chose not to join their movement, when supposedly the movement was all about being allowed to choose things like that? Being the symbol of a movement which continued to try and deny Americans their constitional rights? It took a ****ing airborne division to get kids to school.

If southerners actually are proud of that, they can be, but then they have no right to expect anyone to endorsue, support or even tolerate their position.

Well said.
 
You equate these things to slavery, others don't. So perhaps there is no solution, no meetings of the minds. One side wants them all down, the other wants them to stay. I'll side with Andrew Young, symbols aren't that important. Unless one side makes them the most important thing. It's what's in a man's heart, leave the symbols alone, they are dying out on their own anyway. One at a time, peacefully, without any rancor. Hardening the opposition heart, getting his hackles up ready for a fight, that isn't going to help people get along. That isn't going to help cure the race problem. That isn't going to make life better for blacks or whomever and it isn't going to improve their standard of living. It isn't going to bring down their crime rate or make their neighborhoods safe.

I agree with almost all your comment so I'll just comment on a couple of things.

OK, let's take the Confederate flag. I don't equate it so much with slavery as with white supremacy and Jim Crow because that flag just WAS the banner under which white supremacists rallied to fight civil rights for blacks. It's just the history of the flag. And right now racists and white supremacists, because of that history, still embrace the Confederate flag. See, Dylan Roof.

That obviously does NOT mean that for everyone the Confederate flag means "I hate blacks and long for Jim Crow." I'm positive, 100%, that's not your purpose for defending it - the flag has a completely different history in YOUR family. But it is also FACT that the Confederate flag DOES MEAN "segregation, Jim Crow, white supremacy" to others, especially blacks who suffered or whose parents did just a few years ago in the segregated South, and whose defenders chose the Confederate flag as their banner. So to those black families, the history is one of hate, white supremacy and oppression, and it is JUST AS REAL and JUST AS LEGITIMATE as your history with that flag.

And here's the key. Keeping the statues or the flag won't affect your life in the slightest either. So they are and should be a big deal or a big nothing. You can't on one hand say, to the effect, "they'll pry our Confederate flags/monuments from our cold, dead hands" and on the other hand say to blacks, "Why are you so stupidly worrying about this flag and these monuments? They mean NOTHING of importance!"

It isn't going to solve a thing except harden everyone's hearts that are involved. As long as their are some who view the attack on these statues and flags as wanton destruction by the other side, there will be no meeting of the minds. You can destroy all the symbols, ban them, make all them illegal, but not one heart will be changed or soften, quite the opposite.

I don't really believe that's true. I'm a little more optimistic I guess. Sure, the transition isn't easy and lots of folks get angry, but at the end of the day the controversy does educate all of us and we're better off on the back end.

Just as an example, I've had three different conversations with my mom on the broad issue. Briefly, I went through the history of the Confederate flag in the 1940s-1960s and on the monuments pointed her to Landieu's excellent speech. I don't think she AGREES with me on the issues, at least not entirely, but I know she at least understands the other side.

I said my piece. Two days ago it did seem to me that you were out to destroy.

No, I love the South and the people, the vast majority of whom I think are some of the best people on the planet. And the civil war has been over for 150 years, but if you're my age or older(I'm 54), then you lived through an era where blacks were "free" but were oppressed by the state with Jim Crow laws, which didn't end until roughly 1965. That's just as significant in our history and in these discussions in particular as the era of slavery that ended in 1865.
 
Us uneducated southern folks will have to make a stand. It's not only whites that like the rebel flag.

Go for it! No one is suggesting you can't fly the Confederate flag off the back of your car or pickup or your house. I see it all the time around here in the country. Saw a guy with a pickup just last week with a 6 foot or bigger Confederate flag flying off the back of his pickup. IMO he looked like an idiot, but that's his prerogative. He didn't ask me and I'm sure does not care what I think, nor I him, and he does have a right to express himself, however dumb it makes him look to some of us!
 
Go for it! No one is suggesting you can't fly the Confederate flag off the back of your car or pickup or your house. I see it all the time around here in the country. Saw a guy with a pickup just last week with a 6 foot or bigger Confederate flag flying off the back of his pickup. IMO he looked like an idiot, but that's his prerogative. He didn't ask me and I'm sure does not care what I think, nor I him, and he does have a right to express himself, however dumb it makes him look to some of us!

Thanks for your approval, I fill better now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Right. When current state representatives are dumb enough to say things like this:
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...-if-confederate-statues-t.html#post1067584041

You have to wonder how many think it, but are smart enough not to say it.

I lived in the south for 20 years in three different states. Racism is alive and well. Personally I think it's probably like 50% of whites, maybe the lowest I'd imagine is 30%. Not that they all want to act on it, other than the occasional remark to white friends and family. But its' there.

Defending the confederate flag which is a symbol of the fight to keep black slaves, is absurd. Get the **** over it. Find a new symbol.

What the **** has the south done since slavery, to be proud of? If nothing, then they should stop worrying about the confederate flag, and do something to be proud of. Being racist isn't it.
Look at Texas, at the very least they have he lonestar and Texas pride, and their cattle/rancher and big oil boom roots. They are proud as **** about that, good on them.
Let Louisiana be proud of Edwin Edwards, I mean, being the only state with the Napoleonic code, for Katrina,... Oh hell forget all that..
... for the good food and daiquiris and Cajuns and fishing, and (modest school improvements I think?)

And look at you still talking about the confederate flag. Bad on you IMO, it's divisive and serves no other legitimate purpose in our present-day society.
 
I agree with almost all your comment so I'll just comment on a couple of things.

OK, let's take the Confederate flag. I don't equate it so much with slavery as with white supremacy and Jim Crow because that flag just WAS the banner under which white supremacists rallied to fight civil rights for blacks. It's just the history of the flag. And right now racists and white supremacists, because of that history, still embrace the Confederate flag. See, Dylan Roof.

That obviously does NOT mean that for everyone the Confederate flag means "I hate blacks and long for Jim Crow." I'm positive, 100%, that's not your purpose for defending it - the flag has a completely different history in YOUR family. But it is also FACT that the Confederate flag DOES MEAN "segregation, Jim Crow, white supremacy" to others, especially blacks who suffered or whose parents did just a few years ago in the segregated South, and whose defenders chose the Confederate flag as their banner. So to those black families, the history is one of hate, white supremacy and oppression, and it is JUST AS REAL and JUST AS LEGITIMATE as your history with that flag.

And here's the key. Keeping the statues or the flag won't affect your life in the slightest either. So they are and should be a big deal or a big nothing. You can't on one hand say, to the effect, "they'll pry our Confederate flags/monuments from our cold, dead hands" and on the other hand say to blacks, "Why are you so stupidly worrying about this flag and these monuments? They mean NOTHING of importance!"





No, I love the South and the people, the vast majority of whom I think are some of the best people on the planet. And the civil war has been over for 150 years, but if you're my age or older(I'm 54), then you lived through an era where blacks were "free" but were oppressed by the state with Jim Crow laws, which didn't end until roughly 1965. That's just as significant in our history and in these discussions in particular as the era of slavery that ended in 1865.

That is another thing that gets my hackles up, white supremacist latching onto the confederate flag. I have pictures of our troops from the south defeating the NAZI's during WWII and carrying that confederate flag. It makes me want to take the flag down and go defeat these so called neo-nazi's one more time. That flag was a symbol of rebellion against authority in the 1960's, I'm 70. Usually flew by the don't trust anyone over thirty crowd. Some used it to protest the Vietnam War and LBJ. It's the rebel flag and that was what it stood for. I have no control over what those folks fly.

I suppose I'm a pessimist. It makes no sense one group get all the take and another has to all the giving. You're right, I really don't care much for all the monuments, statues, unless it is the use of force to take them down which is what I see going on today. It's one thing to let them quietly disappear just like the older generations gets replaced by younger ones.

Right now I am glad I'm one old fart. I don't like one iota where this country is headed. Headed more towards a big brother government, headed toward where soothing feelings is much more important than solving problems. Do we have a race problem, we didn't in the military. Civilians do, that I will admit. It accomplishes nothing to make someone feel better while the festering problem grows. I don't think civilians will ever solve the race problem and neither will politicians. Interesting poll here. 72% Say Politicians Talk Race To Get Votes

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...017/72_say_politicians_talk_race_to_get_votes

Yes, I grew up in the 1950's, born right after WWII. Born and raised on a farm and went to a very small country school. All whites of course. I never thought anything of it, that was just the way it was. In the military, drafted in 1966 and made a career out of it. Regardless of race or religion we were a team where everyone had each other's back. No questions asked about what race or religion.

No problem with anyone with my confederate flag either. That is until today.
 
The confederate flag has nothing to do with slavery, it's about the pride that comes with being a southerner, it represents our pride for being self sufficient, we hunt, fish, and grow our own vegetables, we are glad to help a fellow person in need. That's why when you come to the south folks still hold the door open for you and women always enter first, we still say yes sir and no sir, and we have our own language.
We are not racist, we are a very friendly group,
But that is what that flag is about.
Oh but don't confuse our slow talking, politeness as a weakness.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Confederate flag has everything to do with slavery. The Confederacy was literally fighting for slavery. It was the "CSA"'s reason to exist.

I hate to break it to you but other people also hunt, fish and farm. Those people didn't start shooting at US troops.

As long as they aren't a minority, anyway, right?

No, I take your bluster, arrogance and obsession with an imaginary martial past as weakness.
 
You've obviously never read the Fugitive Slave Clause. As for hunting and kidnapping, you can redirect that pointed finger to the African slave markets from which they were purchased and predates European entry by around 900 years.

And if wasn't for southern eagerness for slaves, there wouldn't have been a market for them in the first place. England and France didn't help you for a reason.
 
Not true. See Article I, Section 9, Clause 1 of the original Constitution:

Clause 1. The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

Yes, it was time limited, but this was a very clear endorsement of the power to hold slaves.

See also the three-fifths compromise:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

Let's not forget that if the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention, 25 of them owned slaves.

I don't support the Confederacy, but you are denying a historical fact. The Constitution backed up slavery, hence the need for the Thirteenth Amendment.

Source: The Thirteenth Amendment: Slavery and the Constitution

The whole point of the 3/5ths clause was to keep slave states from using their oppressed populace to ensure slavery would continue indefinitely.

1808 was a long time past and irrelevant by 1860.

They needed the 13th amendment because southerners couldn't handle the concept of African Americans having rights at all, much less constitional ones.
 
You realize that this also describes the Revolutionary War, as well, yes?

You realize that no, despite what Neo Confederates love to claim the American revolutionaries and the Confederacy were nothing alike?
 
Sorry, we ain't going to let go of our flag,maybe the second time we don't lose, I'm willing to give it a try.but remember us southern red necks got plenty of money, and guns. Just saying y'all need to think this through. We won't be using squirrel guns this time.
But look I'll say I'm sorry ,there was slavery it was wrong, things were different in 1800's, we don't have slavery now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh, you'd lose. And lose badly at that.

People in the 1800s were able to realize that slavery was wrong.
 
And if wasn't for southern eagerness for slaves, there wouldn't have been a market for them in the first place. England and France didn't help you for a reason.

The Southern States didn't create slave markets in Africa. As previously noted - those markets existed for many centuries before European entry and continued to exist after importation to the U.S. was banned. I live in Ohio so I don't know who "you" is.
 
Are you a southerner, I am and I'm telling you what the flag means to southerners, you folks got to stop dividing us.
I have lived here all my life 50 years and have never saw the KKK in real life.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When I was in Texas, I saw a KKK bumper sticker. Back in the late 70's, I was visiting south carolina, and saw a bill board that said "This is KKK country, love it or leave it'
 
The Southern States didn't create slave markets in Africa. As previously noted - those markets existed for many centuries before European entry and continued to exist after importation to the U.S. was banned. I live in Ohio so I don't know who "you" is.

The southern states provided a key market for slaves, especially since they continued clinging to slavery long after it had been banned elsewhere in the Americas, with the one exception of Brazil.

Ah, a copperhead. What a surprise.:roll:
 
You realize that no, despite what Neo Confederates love to claim the American revolutionaries and the Confederacy were nothing alike?

Are you saying that the colonists did not betray their country, England, in seceding from it?
 
Back
Top Bottom