• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead[W:7]

Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

I accept that Snopes did its due diligence and actually researched this supposed "list," and found numerous discrepancies from reality.

Kind of like any Facebook post these days, the list sells more than it delivers.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

The correct reply for Desert Storm would either have been acceptance of the Snopes explanation or a detailed explanation as to why Snopes got it wrong. The incorrect response is an ad hom, which is what he resorted to
I'll give you a detailed explanation. Snopes is run by just 2 people who do fact checking by just googling stuff.
They also have a very Liberal bias.

What I find very funny is some of you guys automatically believe Snopes and consider them to be the final authority on all facts.
You might wanna read this:

Accuracy In Politics: Snopes Got Snoped

549519_400684293325790_831357802_n.jpg


Snopes is run by a man and a woman with no background in investigation using Google.

Snopes.com has been considered the 'tell-all final word' on any comment, claim and email. Once negative article by them and people point and say, "See, I told you it wasn't true!" But what is Snopes? What are their methods and training that gives them the authority to decide what is true and what is not? For several years people have tried to find out who exactly was behind the website Snopes.com. Only recently did they get to the bottom of it. Are you ready for this? It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators scouring public records in Washington, no researchers studying historical stacks in libraries, no team of lawyers reaching a consensus on current caselaw. No, Snopes.com is just a mom-and-pop operation that was started by two people who have absolutely no formal background or experience in investigative research.

David and Barbara Mikkelson pictured above; are from San Fernando Valley of California. They started their website 'Snopes' about 13 years ago. After a few years it began gaining popularity as people believed it to be unbiased and neutral. But over the past couple of years people started asking questions when 'Snopes' was proven wrong in a number of their conclusions. There were also criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues, but rather asserting their beliefs in controversial issues.

In 2008, State Farm agent Bud Gregg hoisted a political sign in Mandeville, Louisiana referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet. The Mikkelson's were quick to "research" this issue and post their condemnation of it on Snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Mr. Gregg into taking down the sign. In fact, nothing of the sort ever took place. A friend of Mr. Gregg personally contacted David Mikkelson to alert him of the factual inacuracy, leaving him Mr. Gregg's contact phone numbers. Mr. Mikkelson was told that Mr. Gregg would give him the phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would inform them that they had never pressured Mr. Gregg to take down his sign.

But the Mikkelson's never called Mr. Gregg. In fact, Mr. Gregg found out that no one from Snopes.com had ever contacted any one with State Farm. Yet, Snopes.com has kept their false story of Mr. Gregg up to this day, as the "final factual word" on the issue.

What is behind Snopes' selfish motivation? A simple review of their "fact-checking" reveals a strong tendency to explain away criticisms towards liberal politicians and public figures while giving conservatives the hatchet job. Religious stories and issues are similarly shown no mercy. With the "main-stream" media quickly losing all credibility with their fawning treatment of President Obama, Snopes is being singled out, along with MSNBC and others, as being particularly biased and agenda-modivated.

So if you really want to know the truth about a story or a rumor you have heard, by all means do not go to Snopes.com! You could do just as well if you were a liberal with an internet connection. Don't go to wikipedia.com either as their team of amateur editors have also been caught in a number of bold-faced liberal-biased untruths. (Such as Wikigate and their religious treatment of Obama.) Take anything these sites say with a grain of salt and an understanding that they are written by people with a motive to criticize all things conservative. Use them only to lead you to solid references where you can read their sources for yourself.

Plus, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

Hmmmm,... appeal to authority now.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

I'll give you a detailed explanation. Snopes is run by just 2 people who do fact checking by just googling stuff.
They also have a very Liberal bias.

What I find very funny is some of you guys automatically believe Snopes and consider them to be the final authority on all facts.
You might wanna read this:

Accuracy In Politics: Snopes Got Snoped

549519_400684293325790_831357802_n.jpg

If you asked me--not that any one did--but if you did, I'd say both the murder list and Snopes explanation for them are lacking. So, no. The Clinton's are not mass murderers. And, no. There is not a reasonable explanation for each and every death, thus chalking it all up to coincidence.

IMO, much of it has to do with the company those two keep. It's kind of like how crack dealers have a lot of associates who die young or end up in prison. Comes with the territory.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

I'll give you a detailed explanation. Snopes is run by just 2 people who do fact checking by just googling stuff.
They also have a very Liberal bias.

What I find very funny is some of you guys automatically believe Snopes and consider them to be the final authority on all facts.
You might wanna read this:

549519_400684293325790_831357802_n.jpg

What type of investigative background and what bias does Tami jackson have? How about Jeff Dunetz? David H? Why do you only question those you disagree with?
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

What is being missed here (probably deliberately so) is that it matters not how much formal investigative experience the founders of Snopes, Barbara and David Mikkelson have. Can anyone (besides me) explain why?
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

What is being missed here (probably deliberately so) is that it matters not how much formal investigative experience the founders of Snopes, Barbara and David Mikkelson have. Can anyone (besides me) explain why?

1: they are not the only ones doing the investigating
2: formal experience is not the only way to gain experience
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

1: they are not the only ones doing the investigating
2: formal experience is not the only way to gain experience

Good, and close.

Fundamentally though, it does not matter how much expertise they have. It only matters if they are right or wrong. A person with loads of experience who is wrong is still wrong while a person with zero experience who is right is still right.

Desert Storm wants to attack the messenger, not the message. He doesn't want to address if Snopes is correct on this particular issue so instead introduces a bunch of smoke and mirrors about expertise to avoid discussing the real issue, the only important issue. The mind boggles as to why :confused:
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

I'll give you a detailed explanation. Snopes is run by just 2 people who do fact checking by just googling stuff.
They also have a very Liberal bias.

So?

They are correct, your stuff is drivel.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

So?

They are correct, your stuff is drivel.

People were murdered, beaten, and poisoned who got too close to Clinton Inc.
 
Bill Clinton Sent His Ark State Troopers to Savagely Beat Gary Johnson in June 1992

Here is the overview. Johnson lived next door to Gennifer Flowers at the Quapaw Towers. The security camera used to protect his condo also caught her door. That camera taped Bill going into Gennifer Flowers' condo on numerous occasions with his own key.

Had this security camera tape surfaced while he was lying about Flowers, it would have sent the evil couple back to Arkansas. If it was the Democrats' turn for the presidency in 1992, so be it. But any one of them could have presided over a great economy by just staying out of the way. The Clintons are criminals. Johnson's video could have certainly saved this nation a great deal of grief. We would not be facing the prospect of Hillary in 2008.

You will hear Johnson tell how three henchmen confiscated the tape, then proceeded to smash in his nasal cavity, break his collarbone, break his elbows, puncture his bladder and spleen, and leave him for dead.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

People were murdered, beaten, and poisoned who got too close to Clinton Inc.

Baloney. Let it go. You have had 20+ years, and its still a stupid conspiracy.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

The Clintons are evil personified.

On leaving Ron Brown's funeral, President Bill Clinton was seen laughing and joking ... until he saw the camera, then he went into his sad act!

THE CLINTON BODY-COUNT | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED

 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

The Clintons are evil personified.

On leaving Ron Brown's funeral, President Bill Clinton was seen laughing and joking ... until he saw the camera, then he went into his sad act!-


And, that means.....nothing.

How sad to be living in the past and being obsessed with dredging up absolutely stupid conspiro-wank every day.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

And, that means.....nothing.

How sad to be living in the past and being obsessed with dredging up absolutely stupid conspiro-wank every day.

It means he's a POS. Many were murdered and many less were left to live.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

It means he's a POS. Many were murdered and many less were left to live.

Ooooooo Cue up the scary music!!!!!
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

Ooooooo Cue up the scary music!!!!!

Gary Johnson was almost beaten to death for the reasons posted above. Is that irrelevant to you because it happened 25 year ago? It demonstrates quite clearly how nasty they were and still are in 2016.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

Conspiracy theorists, so angry that normal folk don't buy into their baloney, so dramatic, so FOS.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

And, that means.....nothing.

How sad to be living in the past and being obsessed with dredging up absolutely stupid conspiro-wank every day.

It means nothing ONLY IF one does not understand human behavior.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

It means nothing ONLY IF one does not understand human behavior.

Because, only the conspiracy theorists understand....only them, if only the rest of the world would believe their outlandish fairy tales...whine....
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

Because, only the conspiracy theorists understand....only them, if only the rest of the world would believe their outlandish fairy tales...whine....

Don't know, maybe CTs are just more curious and more perceptive than the average bear? :mrgreen:

Those who automatically and without question accept as true the statements of known liars are not by those actions acting in a rational manner.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

Don't know, maybe CTs are just more curious and more perceptive than the average bear? :mrgreen:

Those who automatically and without question accept as true the statements of known liars are not by those actions acting in a rational manner.

It is so easy to be a conspiracy theorist, make up a story, and when someone challenges you on it, and proves it wrong, you just accuse them of being part of the conspiracy, and then make up a new one.

CT's have proved nothing, that is why everyone laughs at them.
 
Re: The Clinton Murder List - 47 people dead

Not that it will do any good, but The Clinton Body Count : snopes.com
Snopes is your friend. Truly.
I like the bit in Snopes about (Name as many people who were connected to the subject no matter how tenuously and no matter how they died).

I actually think Bill and Hillary would do about anything to maintain their status and power. However, I don't think they could resist bragging about it if the body count were actually in the double digits.
 
Bill Clinton Sent His Ark State Troopers to Savagely Beat Gary Johnson in June 1992

Here is the overview. Johnson lived next door to Gennifer Flowers at the Quapaw Towers. The security camera used to protect his condo also caught her door. That camera taped Bill going into Gennifer Flowers' condo on numerous occasions with his own key.

Had this security camera tape surfaced while he was lying about Flowers, it would have sent the evil couple back to Arkansas. If it was the Democrats' turn for the presidency in 1992, so be it. But any one of them could have presided over a great economy by just staying out of the way. The Clintons are criminals. Johnson's video could have certainly saved this nation a great deal of grief. We would not be facing the prospect of Hillary in 2008.

You will hear Johnson tell how three henchmen confiscated the tape, then proceeded to smash in his nasal cavity, break his collarbone, break his elbows, puncture his bladder and spleen, and leave him for dead.

It is so easy to be a conspiracy theorist, make up a story, and when someone challenges you on it, and proves it wrong, you just accuse them of being part of the conspiracy, and then make up a new one.

CT's have proved nothing, that is why everyone laughs at them.

It's so easy to be a government lackey, believe stupid stories and when someone challenges you on it and proves it wrong you just accuse them of being part of a conspiracy. Rinse and repeat.

GL's have proven nothing and that is why everyone laughs at them.:lamo

Beefheart totally ignores that Gary Johnson was beaten near death to protect the Clintons during their first Presidential run in 1992. He must ignore facts and reality.

lack·ey (lăk′ē)
n. pl. lack·eys
1. A liveried male servant; a footman.
2. A servile follower; a toady.
v. lack·eyed, lack·ey·ing, lack·eys
v.tr.
To wait on as a footman; attend.
v.intr.
To act in a servile manner; fawn.
 
It's so easy to be a government lackey, believe stupid stories and when someone challenges you on it and proves it wrong you just accuse them of being part of a conspiracy. Rinse and repeat.

GL's have proven nothing and that is why everyone laughs at them.:lamo

Beefheart totally ignores that Gary Johnson was beaten near death to protect the Clintons during their first Presidential run in 1992. He must ignore facts and reality.

lack·ey (lăk′ē)
n. pl. lack·eys
1. A liveried male servant; a footman.
2. A servile follower; a toady.
v. lack·eyed, lack·ey·ing, lack·eys
v.tr.
To wait on as a footman; attend.
v.intr.
To act in a servile manner; fawn.

Ah, so now I am a lackey...a government lackey...oooooo

So, am I a "sheeple" too?

Your posts are so funny, because you seriously believe the dogsqueeze you are pumping out.
 
Back
Top Bottom