- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 120,444
- Reaction score
- 76,529
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Yeah, and even the justices realize Roe v Wade was constitutionally groundless. As has been explained to you in this very thread.
To answer your first question, the same way we catch folks breaking other laws when they are trying to hide their illegal activities behind closed doors. By your argument it should be perfectly legal to beat your children as long as no one sees you doing it and you don't leave too many bruises.
*laugh* No, it is not groundless and no, not remotely 'justified'...altho anyone can have an 'explanation.'
Of course you cant beat your children...that infringes on their rights. *Generally* (not always) an infringement on rights can be verified by that individual or representatives or the public, etc. But it's stupid and as I mentioned, IMO unConstitutional to have laws that harm no one and cannot be verified or enforced **without due process and the invasion of privacy.** Very presumptuous and unnecessary on the part of the govt and nothing any real American would ever want...or need.