• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tennessee grocery store attack: ‘He kept on shooting’

Nah. No thanks.
I sort of gave up arguing with the willfully ignorant.
Theres really no point to it.

What this situation calls for is some more guns.

Only the "good guys" though of course.
So your post was bullshit complaining then?

Ok.
 
Risky, has it occurred to you that the reason there may be a correlation is because they had mental health problems, and it was the mental health problems, not the (apparently ineffective) drugs, that caused the homicidal/suicidal behavior?

Just a thought.
 
Yes, and that is likely. But according to Healy AND the fine print of manufacturers of SSRIs and SNRIs both drugs can cause and/or exacerbate violent tendencies.
 
I went grocery shopping today. I carry a gun concealed, and I felt comfortable with the idea that if trouble jumped off, I would at least stand a fighting chance to save myself, and possibly others in the process.

More guns in the hands of the good people is what we need.

I know some of you liberals around here don't like me none too much, but I would guess that in a mass shooter situation you might end up finding me to be your new best friend.

RIP to the innocent person who died in Tennessee today. I wish he or she had been able to shoot back.
 
Witnesses reported that they saw a Good Guy With A Gun, and then suddenly it wasnt a Good Guy anymore.

(Thats how these things ALWAYS go down)
The witness was wrong. It was a bad guy with a gun and he went on a murderous
rage.
 
More guns in the hands of the good people is what we need.

Sounds like a great society.
Tons of FrEeDuMbZ$™.

I can definitely see where sane and reasonable people want to shoot it out with "bad guys" while shopping for groceries. Just makes good sense. Its an optimal situation that is very desirable.
 
Knowledge of why can lead others to identifying some one off the deep end
But just another day in the US

It's never going to happen. The only thing more irresponsible than our gun laws in America is our complete deficiency in caring for the mentally ill.

Even if we were good at it, it would be a near impossible job to try to spot people before they crack and successfully intervene.
 
True but with so many guns, a chunk of our population that can't be trusted with guns, has them...often legally. It's a package deal.
so tell us what your solution is to this problem. keep in mind the constitution and the reality that someone who is willing to do this is beyond being deterred by the threat of even a death sentence
 
Neither does the endless gun control debate, apparently.
well we do see some of the usual suspects gleefully whining about the NRA and gun ownership before they even know where the person got a firearm, whether he could legally own it etc
 
Sounds like a great society.
Tons of FrEeDuMbZ$™.
Self defense is a natural right in EVERY society, my friend.

I can definitely see where sane and reasonable people want to shoot it out with "bad guys" while shopping for groceries. Just makes good sense. Its an optimal situation that is very desirable.
Logical fail.

Where did I say that having to use a gun in public was the optimal situation? I didn't. It is only more opitmal than being murdered don't you think? Would it be more optimal to be killed by mass shooter in your book? Or wouldn't it be more optimal to defend your life, and possibly others, and the bad guy is the one who dies?

Your problem here is an inability to distinguish between evil and good, because you believe the gun is the evil thing making EVERYONE who uses one evil. That isn't logical. Guns are not evil, people are evil.
 
so tell us what your solution is to this problem. keep in mind the constitution and the reality that someone who is willing to do this is beyond being deterred by the threat of even a death sentence
Perhaps wearing body armor when I go to Kroger?
 
Perhaps wearing body armor when I go to Kroger?
go for it. You can get a good vest for about 275 but thats only rated about 357 Mag and lower. You can buy something that will stop 762 NATO-Level IV but its gonna be heavy and much more expensive.
 
so tell us what your solution is to this problem. keep in mind the constitution and the reality that someone who is willing to do this is beyond being deterred by the threat of even a death sentence

More guns, less gun restrictions so there'll be more guns in more places, and more austerity measures?
 
what austerity measures?

The ones that conservatives want. Cut the social safety net, cut taxes on the wealthy, and pump up US militarism spending even more. Then everyone will feel like they need guns.
 
The ones that conservatives want. Cut the social safety net, cut taxes on the wealthy, and pump up US militarism spending even more. Then everyone will feel like they need guns.
what does your hatred of our military have to do with this. since you don't know what caused the guy to start going bezerk your complaints about the safety net and your dislike for the wealthy are misplaced, stupid or premature
 
what does your hatred of our military have to do with this. since you don't know what caused the guy to start going bezerk your complaints about the safety net and your dislike for the wealthy are misplaced, stupid or premature

I was answering your question, [forum rules inhibit me from saying what should be said to an overly abrasive ...]
 
It's not an excuse that justifies him not facing punitive consequences, but his behavior is something we should study and try to understand. The best way to stop future shootings starts with us figuring out what causes them.
 

I was doing some work online and went to access something on YT and Agenda Free TV was on live discussing it. I came here thinking there would be a thread and only thing I found was comment by calamity over in the gun forum. I flipped on the TV and nothing. But you're exactly right. Coverage of this kind of thing has become so common the news gives it a few words and moves on.
 
And the next time someone kills someone else with an automobile lets take away all the cars.
they won't support that unless they believed a large majority of drivers vote against the politicians they want in office
 



Yeah, big surprise there, not having any "regard for other peoples lives" isn't a "mental issue" or a "problem" to y'all.



And the next time someone kills someone else with an automobile lets take away all the cars.



 
Guns. Again. Guns.

Once again, our laws and their level of enforcement were inadequate. Once again there are shooting deaths.

Shooting deaths occur on average about once every 30 minutes in the United States of America.

Guns. Again. Guns.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.
 
And predictably this will encourage certain people to buy even more guns, and the endless cycle of Americans enthusiastically shooting other Americans will continue until someone has the guts to do something, anything, to restrict and regulate gun ownership and how laughably easy it is to get your hands on one. I hate the wretched, pointless things.
In the wake of two horrific massacres (Hungerford and Dunblane), perpetrated by individuals using legally-held firearms, Britain enacted stringent firearm legislation. The result? No more massacres. UK deaths by gun in 2019, 33 (thirty three). USA, 14,141 (fourteen thousand, one hundred forty one).
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…