- Joined
- Jul 4, 2011
- Messages
- 32,450
- Reaction score
- 14,067
- Location
- Near Seattle
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
If you have strong faith, why do you need anyone else to recognize the importance of the Bible, much less 'the state?'
(emphasis added by me)Christ declared that whoever does not believe will be damned. So if one believes, and loves one's neighbors, one will wish that they also believe.
(emphasis added by me)
Agreed. Yet - Wishing it and trying to force it are two separate and distinct actions.
Having the state establish a religion is the latter, not the former.
Actually, the states have the power to do that if they want to. The First Amendment restricts Congress, not the states, from establishing a religion: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; ..."
However, having the power to do a thing does not necessarily make doing the thing the right thing to do.
They have State songs, state flowers , state mottoes, and so on. Why not a State book?
Well, they won't be doing any of that. It's really just a book, though a hugely successful and very influential book.Tennessee Constitution, Article 1 "declaration of rights," section 3.
"... that no preference shall ever be given, by law, to any religious establishment or mode of worship."
http://www.capitol.tn.gov/about/docs/tn-constitution.pdf
Ad hominem.
They have State songs, state flowers , state mottoes, and so on. Why not a State book?
Georgia could select 'Gone With The Wind', for example, Minnesotans might select 'Main Street', and Californians would probably nominate 'One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest'.
Well, they won't be doing any of that. It's really just a book, though a hugely successful and very influential book.
Well, they won't be doing any of that. It's really just a book, though a hugely successful and very influential book.
One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest took place in Oregon.
Was the Bible written in Tennessee, or is it about Tennessee? Or is this, yet again, an attempt by Republicans to force religion on people?
This is wrong, in my eyes.
To do this under the guise of calling the Bible a "book" is deceptive and skirting the proponents true intentions.
What a ridiculous waste of taxpayer $$, for legislators to be spending time on this. Every single resident should be outraged.
If you have strong faith, why do you need anyone else to recognize the importance of the Bible, much less 'the state?'
Is it your view, then, that a state could constitutionally ban the practice of Christianity?Actually, the states have the power to do that if they want to. The First Amendment restricts Congress, not the states, from establishing a religion: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; ..."
However, having the power to do a thing does not necessarily make doing the thing the right thing to do.