With guns and pregnancies, there is always a question of...'will that impact me personally?'. The EPA decision removes that uncertainty.Exactly. Like, I support more gun control don't get me wrong. But on the grand scheme of things they are causing far more damage in other areas right now that I'm more worried about.
There is nothing rogue about the Supreme Court finally upholding more of the Constitution.With respect:
Nice attempt to downplay the rogue conservative supreme court.
This new focus on enforcing the Constitution is a move to a brighter future, not a move to the past.I can't believe the country is being thrown back in time by deplorables.
This new focus on enforcing the Constitution is a move to a brighter future, not a move to the past.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Thursday that gun cases involving restrictions in Hawaii, California, New Jersey and Maryland deserve a new look following its major decision in a gun case last week. In light of last week's ruling — which said that Americans have a right to carry a gun outside the home — lower courts should take another look at several cases that had been awaiting action by the high court, the court said. Those cases include ones about high-capacity magazines, an assault weapons ban and a state law that limits who can carry a gun outside the home.
Very interesting.
Many states with such laws, or those states contemplating such laws may well find themselves scrambling to make changes if they wish to avoid arguing before the current SCOTUS, which has shown itself to be largely in favor of not treating the Second Amendment as a lesser Constitutional right.
This new focus on enforcing the Constitution is a move to a brighter future, not a move to the past.
There is nothing rogue about the Supreme Court finally upholding more of the Constitution.
Was was rogue was all these progressive judges who allowed the Constitution to be violated for all these years.
The Supreme Court seems to think that just about every judicial decision made in the last 150 years deserves a "new look."
Care to elaborate?The constitution has little relevance in 2022. It is nothing more than a false idol to rally ideology around today.
Living as if it is 1950 instead of 2022 is most certainly unhealthy, disruptive and dangerous. Especially when its minority rule and that minority rule is anti science. Anti progress. Anti enlightenment.
This is a Second Amendment thread and I am referring to their ruling on the Second Amendment.Women's bodies put in service to state represents a brighter future? Not likely.
That is incorrect. The Constitution continues to be the supreme law of the land.The constitution has little relevance in 2022. It is nothing more than a false idol to rally ideology around today.
That's OK. No one is trying to live as if it is 1950.Living as if it is 1950 instead of 2022 is most certainly unhealthy, disruptive and dangerous. Especially when its minority rule and that minority rule is anti science. Anti progress. Anti enlightenment.
As I said in my previous post, this is a Second Amendment thread and I am referring to their ruling on the Second Amendment.Really? Even though it was a 7-2 conservative court that originally gave us Roe? 5 GOP and 2 dems gave us Roe.
1 GOP and 1 Dem decented.
This current crazy court overuled a 7-2 conservative decision.
No, the court was far less agenda driven in the past, far less nut wing crazy. All the progress this country has made in court has been with Gop judges supporting it.
Now we have crazies.
So how come you failed to point out anything untrue in my posts?Your posts really are totally void of real knowledge.
Only to progressives. The American people, on the other hand, actually value our freedom and civil liberties.Yelling constitution, constitution only makes them sound uneducated and extreme politically.
That is incorrect. The Second Amendment is very much part of the Constitution.This is not constitution, this is crazy land.
Nonsense. All the Supreme Court did was uphold part of the Second Amendment.The court is intent on becoming an extremist legislative body..
That is incorrect. The Constitution continues to be the supreme law of the land.
That's OK. No one is trying to live as if it is 1950.
As I said in my previous post, this is a Second Amendment thread and I am referring to their ruling on the Second Amendment.
I seldom get into the abortion fray. It's not my thing. Although I do find a lot of feminists to be pretty nutty.
Actually not the most hard-core feminists though. The most hard-core of them are honestly fighting for equal rights. Them I respect.
So how come you failed to point out anything untrue in my posts?
Only to progressives. The American people, on the other hand, actually value our freedom and civil liberties.
That is incorrect. The Second Amendment is very much part of the Constitution.
Nonsense. All the Supreme Court did was uphold part of the Second Amendment.
Does this mean you cannot point out any untrue statements in my posts?A horse with blinders sees little.
Does this mean you cannot point out any untrue statements in my posts?
With the highest voter turnout in history in 2020, people did vote. The latest Monmouth poll says the nation under the present administration is headed in the wrong direction, 88% -10%. So yeah some folks may not vote but they aren't going to vote for democrats.Not necessarily true, and lots of people didn't vote.
Yes, we pro life people thank them. So do millions of babies.
Yes heaven forbid congress actually do their job instead of just pretending unelected bureaucrats have unlimited power.Imo the EPA ruling today will kill more people than either the weapons or abortion rulings.
Well at a minimum you certainly didn't manage to point out anything untrue in my posts.
It looks like an attempt to avoid admitting that what I said is true.Its meaning is clear.
Good I hope that more and more people feel like you do.I am infinitely more worried about the supreme courts grinding assault on civil rights and possible turnover of election conduction to the states. These gun control rulings aren't even a secondary concern at this point.
Dream dream dream. It’s healthyDon't worry. As a result of the abortion, gun control, and EPA rulings, the Democrats will win tons more seats in the House and Senate, and they'll be able to address it through legislation.
What the Supreme Court should reexamine is their bullshit ruling in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). Particular considering the Supreme Court was under considerable duress by a fascist President that was eager to replace them. FDR replaced all nine Justices in a six-year period between 1937 and 1943, whether they wanted to be replaced or not. Any decision by the Supreme Court between 1937 and the year of FDR's death, 1945, should be considered suspect and be reexamined.WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Thursday that gun cases involving restrictions in Hawaii, California, New Jersey and Maryland deserve a new look following its major decision in a gun case last week. In light of last week's ruling — which said that Americans have a right to carry a gun outside the home — lower courts should take another look at several cases that had been awaiting action by the high court, the court said. Those cases include ones about high-capacity magazines, an assault weapons ban and a state law that limits who can carry a gun outside the home.
Very interesting.
Many states with such laws, or those states contemplating such laws may well find themselves scrambling to make changes if they wish to avoid arguing before the current SCOTUS, which has shown itself to be largely in favor of not treating the Second Amendment as a lesser Constitutional right.
What a stupid and incendiary postDon't we already have enough angry leftists?
I wonder when they will have a serious meltdown.
Looks like there is room behind Mitch for more ass kissers
Environmental Protection Agency unclear to you?Yes heaven forbid congress actually do their job instead of just pretending unelected bureaucrats have unlimited power.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?