Sorry, I started ranting, just imagine a rabid dog foaming at the mouth barking it's head off, oops, ouch.
Calmer? When we're thirty-trillion dollars in debt, when we could have been debt free?
They think the tax cut will stimulate so much that it'll cover the loss in revenue, but it never does, and it's depression instead.
Yes, he had to veto their budget and shut down Government, but his fiscal responsibility had him with a boom and surplus.
Bush Jr, should have made them behave for their oil and/or done the troop surge right away.
I don't believe in power vacuums, if you want a vacuum, I'll vent you into space, otherwise, there is no vacuum.
They could at least fund the ATF department that can restore one's rights. Republicans defunded that and continue to do so.
It's always illegal federally.
If enough people do want it, that's what they get.
Non-compliance, means that they aren't complying with inspections.A power vacuum exists when a government and its apparatus, is rapidly destroyed/withdrawn
The people have no control in their lives and society rapidly breaks down into anarchy
You get this in a riot
Another example is when the police of Montreal, suddenly went on strike in 1969:
Murray-Hill riot - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Until troops arrived to restore order, there was a definite power vacuum, and society fell apart
As we saw, there was no non-compliance
Iraq had no WMD
Saddam was a POS, but he represented order. Bush Jr was hell bent on righting a perceived defeat of his father...after the 1990-91 Gulf War, Bush Sr lost office, while Saddam remained in power
Not too many presidents win a war so overwhelmingly and get voted out of office the next year
Invading Iraq was a REALLY bad idea
The invasion of Iraq was a huge mistake, as was the invasion of Afghanistan
Ask yourself what the cost has been, ask yourself what benefits we have got - if any
A clearer headed man might want to know where the quickest exit was and where the closest hospital is
Winning the Gulf War was essential. But that should have been it.
The first thing you want to do to fill the power vacuum is to have the police maintain order, because if they don't they won't get any oil money.A power vacuum exists when a government and its apparatus, is rapidly destroyed/withdrawn
The people have no control in their lives and society rapidly breaks down into anarchy
You get this in a riot
Another example is when the police of Montreal, suddenly went on strike in 1969:
Murray-Hill riot - Wikipedia
Until troops arrived to restore order, there was a definite power vacuum, and society fell apart
As we saw, there was no non-compliance
Iraq had no WMD
Saddam was a POS, but he represented order. Bush Jr was hell bent on righting a perceived defeat of his father...after the 1990-91 Gulf War, Bush Sr lost office, while Saddam remained in power
Not too many presidents win a war so overwhelmingly and get voted out of office the next year
Invading Iraq was a REALLY bad idea
The invasion of Iraq was a huge mistake, as was the invasion of Afghanistan
Ask yourself what the cost has been, ask yourself what benefits we have got - if any
A clearer headed man might want to know where the quickest exit was and where the closest hospital is
Winning the Gulf War was essential. But that should have been it.
The most glaring example of what you said is the lack of voting rights for felons who have completed their sentences. It's funny that there is such a fuss about letting more more people buy guns while the same people support keeping freed criminals 2nd class citizens by denying their right to vote. It is hypocritical to say the least.
enough people want to enslave a group of people then they get it that's tyranny.
No, they were running around and playing games. We needed to set an example for Iran and North Korea.
ISIS isn't running Iraq.
Sounds like fake news to me.Nowhere near enough cause for a multi-billion dollar waste of money vanity war....so we've toppled a dictator and destabilized the region in the process
Large parts of it, Syria too
All thanks to Bush Jr
Territory of the Islamic State - Wikipedia
No felon "serves their time"... they are just not serving it in jail once they are let out.The Supreme Court has failed to do it's duty to restore the rights of our citizens after they have served their time. In this case, it's non-violent felony charges that have caused a lifetime ban on gun ownership. I'm against the permanent disenfranchisement of our citizenry. This also will disproportionately effect minorities. I personally feel that no matter what the time was, if you get released for "serving your time" then you should have everything restored back to you. There shouldn't even be a felony status, imo, but that's a whole 'nother ball of wax.
The SCOTUS failed here. Just to get a taste of the things that could result in your permanent loss of 2A rights, see below:
Supreme Court passes on Second Amendment cases challenging lifetime gun ownership ban
The Supreme Court declined to hear three Second Amendment cases challenging a federal ban on gun ownership for people convicted of nonviolent crimes.www.usatoday.com
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up three challenges to a federal ban on gun ownership for people convicted of nonviolent crimes, disappointing Second Amendment advocates who hoped a more conservative court would begin to chip away at the restriction.
By not taking the appeals, the nation's highest court let stand a series of lower court rulings that prohibited people convicted of driving under the influence, making false statements on tax returns and selling counterfeit cassette tapes from owning a gun.