• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Stopped in 80 Seconds: Armed Response, Not Gun Control, Halted School Rampage

Rocketman

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
5,660
Reaction score
1,252
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Back in March, we reported on Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper (D) signing into law the most sweeping anti-gun legislation in the history of the Centennial State, despite overwhelming opposition to the legislation. The new law bans magazines with a capacity of greater than 15 rounds, imposes a "gun tax" for a background check when purchasing a firearm, and criminalizes the private transfer of a firearm, among other things. The anti-gunners claimed these measures would keep guns out of the hands of bad guys.

Last week's tragic shooting at Arapahoe High School in Centennial, Colorado, left one student in critical condition. The perpetrator, a senior at the school, was reported to have randomly shot 17-year-old Claire Davis as she sat innocently in the hallway. As bad as that was, things could have been much worse.

Information released this week indicates that the perpetrator was planning a much larger attack and was armed with a shotgun, about 125 rounds of ammunition, three Molotov cocktails and a machete.

According to a CNN story, Arapahoe County Sheriff Grayson Robinson said of the shooter, "His intent was evil, and his evil intent was to harm multiple individuals."

On his arm, the perpetrator had written in indelible ink five classroom numbers and a phrase in Latin that translates to "the die has been cast," according to the sheriff's office.

But as reported in the Washington Times, the attacker's mission was stopped short by the quick response of an armed deputy sheriff who was working as a resource officer at the school. Upon learning of the threat, the deputy ran from the cafeteria to the library, yelling for people to get down and identifying himself as a deputy sheriff. The horrific incident lasted only a total of 80 seconds and ended with the shooter turning his gun on himself in the library as the deputy was closing in on him.

NRA-ILA | Stopped in 80 Seconds: Armed Response, Not Gun Control, Halted School Rampage
 
Back in March, we reported on Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper (D) signing into law the most sweeping anti-gun legislation in the history of the Centennial State, despite overwhelming opposition to the legislation. The new law bans magazines with a capacity of greater than 15 rounds, imposes a "gun tax" for a background check when purchasing a firearm, and criminalizes the private transfer of a firearm, among other things. The anti-gunners claimed these measures would keep guns out of the hands of bad guys.

Lets stop right their. How do I know that "despite overwhelming opposition to the legislation" is not in fact true?

There is no politician on this earth that will sign himself and his party out of a job. What that means it any opposition was of no POLITICAL consequence. It was not organised, it was not serious and those who objected could not be bothered to do anything if the law passed but ACCEPT it. In other words if you want to object to laws one had better be serius and be willing to to hold politicians and political parties accountable. Not make excuses and vote for the guy becasue there is nothing better or on the promise of largess. Those involved need to carry their gun control support to the grave not be forgiven. And people need reminding who they are.

What have politicians got to fear from firearm owners as long as they can still own guns somehow? Because that is all they value, their guns.
 
Lets stop right their. How do I know that "despite overwhelming opposition to the legislation" is not in fact true?

There is no politician on this earth that will sign himself and his party out of a job. What that means it any opposition was of no POLITICAL consequence. It was not organised, it was not serious and those who objected could not be bothered to do anything if the law passed but ACCEPT it. In other words if you want to object to laws one had better be serius and be willing to to hold politicians and political parties accountable. Not make excuses and vote for the guy becasue there is nothing better or on the promise of largess. Those involved need to carry their gun control support to the grave not be forgiven. And people need reminding who they are.

What have politicians got to fear from firearm owners as long as they can still own guns somehow? Because that is all they value, their guns.

Do the two successful recall elections factor into your proposal?
 
Its really telling how quick the media and those that promote gun bans twist their own words, shift attention, omit, and ignore reality.
 
Many of us retired teachers and those still at it have supported CCW and OP resource officers..
The right-ists need to stop patting themselves on the backs for being the only people who want to save our children..
As per the BIble, those who brag have already received their reward .
Just in case you guys hadn't heard: Arapahoe High School shooting victim dies - CNN.com

If it weren't for the quick action of the ARMED resource officer, this young lady wouldn't have been the only victim.
 
Take your word omit and put a V in front of it..
Its really telling how quick the media and those that promote gun bans twist their own words, shift attention, omit, and ignore reality.
 
another fine example of citizens united/divided secret money swaying elections in corrupt capitalism .
Do the two successful recall elections factor into your proposal?
 
Do the two successful recall elections factor into your proposal?

No because firearm owners or organisations had nothing to do with it. You are claiming a correlation has some causality. Prove it. What did firearm organisations or owners do to gain this?
 
another fine example of citizens united/divided secret money swaying elections in corrupt capitalism .

Citizens have a duty to keep politicians honest, accountable and doing what they were hired to do. Do you have a problem with that?
 
another fine example of citizens united/divided secret money swaying elections in corrupt capitalism .

Oh yeah, I guess you saw where they were handing out thousand dollar bills to vote their at polling place huh?
 
Lets stop right their. How do I know that "despite overwhelming opposition to the legislation" is not in fact true?

There is no politician on this earth that will sign himself and his party out of a job. What that means it any opposition was of no POLITICAL consequence. It was not organised, it was not serious and those who objected could not be bothered to do anything if the law passed but ACCEPT it. In other words if you want to object to laws one had better be serius and be willing to to hold politicians and political parties accountable. Not make excuses and vote for the guy becasue there is nothing better or on the promise of largess. Those involved need to carry their gun control support to the grave not be forgiven. And people need reminding who they are.

What have politicians got to fear from firearm owners as long as they can still own guns somehow? Because that is all they value, their guns.

Recall petitions and elections.
 
Do you believe in secret, dirty money running elections since the SCOTUS decision ?
Citizens have a duty to keep politicians honest, accountable and doing what they were hired to do. Do you have a problem with that?
 
You keep dodging the real dirty,secret money that influenced the recalls before the election..
There's a school board going through that Koch experience right now in Colorado also..
Just like the one the Kochs lost in Wayne county, North Carolina..
You're for buying elections ?
Oh yeah, I guess you saw where they were handing out thousand dollar bills to vote their at polling place huh?
 
You keep dodging the real dirty,secret money that influenced the recalls before the election..
There's a school board going through that Koch experience right now in Colorado also..
Just like the one the Kochs lost in Wayne county, North Carolina..
You're for buying elections ?

No, only unions should be able to do that. ;)
 
another fine example of citizens united/divided secret money swaying elections in corrupt capitalism .

It was not "secret" since both you, I and the media are well aware of it. You only seem to get your panties in a wad when the outside support is for the "wrong" side of an issue. Do you rant like that over labor union spending or Bloomberg's big money backing?
 
Its really telling how quick the media and those that promote gun bans twist their own words, shift attention, omit, and ignore reality.

The reality is that firearm organisations had nothing to do with anything but agreeing with gun control, selling guns, promoting guns, training, sports, membership an and paying politicians. Or otherwise just sitting on their bum doing nothing.

Sheriffs and Obama fear did more for firearm ownership rights than all organisations and owners combined.

During the 6 months of Sand Hook frenzy count the number of firearm organisations and media releases that addressed citizens safety and rights. Now count the number of gun control releases, activities, TV shows, radio shows, newspapers, covered events, buybacks, mayors rabbiting off, state gun laws passed, proposed, waiting. You are seriously deluded when you think what firearm owners are doing is opposition.

Only organisations I remember were GOA very vocal and JFPO. There may well have been others but most definitely not the NRA.

If it were opposition how come this wonderful opposition is like a mouse squeak in California? Not enough firearm owners? Not enough firearm organisations or not enough brains? Or they just don't have a clue what to do.
 
A long as the money is not "SECRETIVE", I don't give a **** how much any of them give..
No, only unions should be able to do that. ;)
Corporations are people my friend, as long as I know who those people are .
 
Corporations are a system with people in it, like the government. The system in those cases are the primary function and number one priority, not the people.
 
It is secret because you and I don't know who gave what--the "Corrupt Corporatist Capitalist" way..
Our new CCC is a far-cry from the one in the 1930's .
It was not "secret" since both you, I and the media are well aware of it. You only seem to get your panties in a wad when the outside support is for the "wrong" side of an issue. Do you rant like that over labor union spending or Bloomberg's big money backing?
 
Back in March, we reported on Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper (D) signing into law the most sweeping anti-gun legislation in the history of the Centennial State, despite overwhelming opposition to the legislation. The new law bans magazines with a capacity of greater than 15 rounds, imposes a "gun tax" for a background check when purchasing a firearm, and criminalizes the private transfer of a firearm, among other things. The anti-gunners claimed these measures would keep guns out of the hands of bad guys.

Last week's tragic shooting at Arapahoe High School in Centennial, Colorado, left one student in critical condition. The perpetrator, a senior at the school, was reported to have randomly shot 17-year-old Claire Davis as she sat innocently in the hallway. As bad as that was, things could have been much worse.

Information released this week indicates that the perpetrator was planning a much larger attack and was armed with a shotgun, about 125 rounds of ammunition, three Molotov cocktails and a machete.

According to a CNN story, Arapahoe County Sheriff Grayson Robinson said of the shooter, "His intent was evil, and his evil intent was to harm multiple individuals."

On his arm, the perpetrator had written in indelible ink five classroom numbers and a phrase in Latin that translates to "the die has been cast," according to the sheriff's office.

But as reported in the Washington Times, the attacker's mission was stopped short by the quick response of an armed deputy sheriff

Armed state/county officials have no business being anywhere near a school. They're not accountable to any of the students or their parents, and owe their allegiance merely to corrupt sleazy pols.

If sheriffs and cops are at schools, they'll just deactivate the security cameras at will, and start raping/molesting kids, using their authority as a shield against prosecution, and no one wants that.

The appropriate thing to to do is to allow teachers and/or students to voluntarily bring guns to school for their own (and their fellow students') protection, OR for private schools to hire private guards for the school--employees that are ACCOUNTABLE to the parents who send their kids there.
 
Are you claiming because a newspaper reporter thinks so that's it? Can you do better than that? No you must do better than that.

Would the NRA lie about the NRA too?



 
Last edited:
The reality is that firearm organisations had nothing to do with anything but agreeing with gun control, selling guns, promoting guns, training, sports, membership an and paying politicians. Or otherwise just sitting on their bum doing nothing.

Sheriffs and Obama fear did more for firearm ownership rights than all organisations and owners combined.

During the 6 months of Sand Hook frenzy count the number of firearm organisations and media releases that addressed citizens safety and rights. Now count the number of gun control releases, activities, TV shows, radio shows, newspapers, covered events, buybacks, mayors rabbiting off, state gun laws passed, proposed, waiting. You are seriously deluded when you think what firearm owners are doing is opposition.

Only organisations I remember were GOA very vocal and JFPO. There may well have been others but most definitely not the NRA.

If it were opposition how come this wonderful opposition is like a mouse squeak in California? Not enough firearm owners? Not enough firearm organisations or not enough brains? Or they just don't have a clue what to do.
What makes you think there is not opposition to the gun regulations in California? The fact is California voters want free ****. The people they elect that promise them free **** are anti-gun. You want to know how you got from here to there? There ya go. You can protest all you want. You can speak in droves and you can sign petitions (every been to any gun shows in California?). The fact remains...handouts trump gun rights in California. In Colorado the anti gun activitists woke up the voters. thats a good thing...but just a start.

Of course...your comments did nothing to address the OP or the media...but I DO hope it made you feel better.
 
Back
Top Bottom