How can both be true?
This started happening only after Obama got in office? Because of Obama?Because wealth is being created on speculation rather than production.
Corporations are profiting, but are the American people? No.
So you'd think the conservatives would be jumping for joy.
What with trickle down and all it's just a short matter of time before we all start reaping the rewards...
And the problem with Obama is that he is continuing the policies of Bush and not Clinton. He is part of the trickle-down problem.Trickle down is the biggest joke of an economic theory I have ever heard. Small business growth was doubled, even with higher taxes, under Clinton compared to Bush.
And the problem with Obama is that he is continuing the policies of Bush and not Clinton. He is part of the trickle-down problem.
Good point about taxes. He's getting his ass kicked over that issue, though.I wouldn't agree with that in full. Yes, I see a lot of Bush in Obama but there are clear differences as well. Obama acknowledged the need for higher taxes, especially on the highest earners, thus making almost irrelevant the trickle down claim with Obama you made. Corporate tax hasn't really changed over the past 30 years a ton, so I can see why you might make that argument, but from an income tax perspective, Obama isn't pretending that lowering taxes is going to fix the debt problems, and that's the main difference.
And how is this any more anemic than the recovery during the 6 years when Bush and the GOP controlled Congress and the White House?Something the left isn't considering while popping their champagne corks over "records" in some industry profits and even the stock market is that these records are only "records" if you aren't using real inflation/adjusted dollars. Corporate profits should always be higher and higher and higher as (1) populations rise and (2) inflation reduces the dollar's buying power. The same goes for the stock market.
What we actually have is an economy that is recovering very slowly. The stock market is only in record territory because the Fed has assured investors that the "free money" from the Fed will continue flowing for the foreseeable future. Corporate profits are the result of having ratcheted down their operations to run lean and having an economy on a slightly upward trajectory.
We aren't out of the woods, yet, and aside from the fact that Bernanke, who was appointed by Bush was re-appointed by Obama, there isn't a lot that you can actually say Obama has done to improve the economy. In fact, there isn't anything I can think of that has made any significant difference. Obama has been, at best, a non-factor in this very anemic economic recovery we are experiencing.
And how is this any more anemic than the recovery during the 6 years when Bush and the GOP controlled Congress and the White House?
Actually, Conservatives have said Obama's economic performance has been worse than Carter. This isn't all about what you alone have been saying in this thread.Why are you challenging an assertion that was never made?
Actually, Conservatives have said Obama's economic performance has been worse than Carter. This isn't all about what you alone have been saying in this thread.
Good point about taxes. He's getting his ass
kicked over that issue, though.
I still want to know from Conservatives how they think Obama is destroying the economy... seeing as they've been repeating this meme like forever now.
The DOW is, especially now a poor indicator when it comes to our economic health.
It's pretty simple, Bernakes pumping is removing risk by lowering interest rates. If your'e a Obama supporter there is nothing to cheer about.
The instant Bernake stops pumping your'e going to see a massive sell off.
Bernake JUST said the economy would. TANK if he stopped QE.
Thats the House of cards Obama's built. A economy that has to be propped up with printing is a economy on life support.
Good point about taxes. He's getting his ass
kicked over that issue, though.
I still want to know from Conservatives how they think Obama is destroying the economy... seeing as they've been repeating this meme like forever now.
How can both be true?
There is NO recovery, there is only a lie, Obama's largest lie yet.
You can't reference the DOW when it's Bernake's perpetual QE that's inflating it. You can't use that as a viable referrence when just a hint of stopping QE causes a sell off.
Hell, Bernake JUST said the economy would tank if he stopped his pumping.
Thats Obama's economy, a house of cards propped up with printng.
Thats indicative of a economy on life support nearly 5 years after his election.
A jobless recovery is NOT a recovery and Obama's borrowing and Bernakes printing have only exacervated the problem.
What are we going to learn from all of this, I hope is that there is a price to be paid for appealing to the lowest common denominator.
Because wealth is being created on speculation rather than production.
How can both be true?
Nope. Even adjusted for inflation, corporate profits are up.Something the left isn't considering while popping their champagne corks over "records" in some industry profits and even the stock market is that these records are only "records" if you aren't using real inflation/adjusted dollars.
Yes... which is why we look at inflation-adjusted dollars, profit margins, and compare margins to GDP.Corporate profits should always be higher and higher and higher as (1) populations rise and (2) inflation reduces the dollar's buying power.
Yes, the economy is recovering slowly. No, the markets are not only in record territory because of Fed intervention. It's also because of confidence in the US economy by investors, and big corporate profits.What we actually have is an economy that is recovering very slowly. The stock market is only in record territory because the Fed has assured investors that the "free money" from the Fed will continue flowing for the foreseeable future.
How can both be true?