• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Some Racist whiteguy think Hitler is an civil right leader

RyrineaHaruno

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
1,827
Reaction score
409
Location
Humble Texas
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal



You read the title correctly, and I thought their wasn't anyone that stupid in the world. How is Hitler consider a Civil right leader? I am not sure, if this is right forum or not since it has history related stuff in it.
 
Last edited:
White Supremacists consider Hitler to be a civil rights leader for his pioneering work in promoting the civil rights of the Aryan Race, at a time when Western Civilization was moving away from the natural and inherent privilege of Whites in favor of other, lesser races.

That's pretty much how the line goes. Never mind that he got Germany destroyed again and left half of it in the hands of the godless Slavic Communists.
 
Some racist black guy thinks Al Sharpton is a civil rights leader. :roll:

Who is more accepted, Al Sharpton or Hitler?
 
Caine said:
Some racist black guy thinks Al Sharpton is a civil rights leader. :roll:

Who is more accepted, Al Sharpton or Hitler?
Click to expand...

al sharpton. There's no ****ing competition Caine.
 
RyrineaHaruno said:
You read the title correctly, and I thought their wasn't anyone that stupid in the world. How is Hitler consider a Civil right leader? I am not sure, if this is right forum or not since it has history related stuff in it.
Click to expand...
Hitler, the Socialist, was a big fan of nationalized health care.
 
Arch Enemy said:
al sharpton. There's no ****ing competition Caine.
Click to expand...

I know there isn't. But here is my point...

While Hitler was much much worse than Al Sharpton, Al Sharpton is a racist. Hitler was a racist. It is no surprise that racists view racist leaders as supporters of their prospective civil rights.

My point is this, BIG ****ING DEAL. Some racist white dude views Hitler as a civil rights leader. The fact that the jackass is a racist idiot already makes his views to be not taken seriously, so the fact that he views Hitler as a civil rights leader falls in line with that. Because nobody likes Hitler.
 
Last edited:
Southern Man said:
http://users.stlcc.edu/rkalfus/PDFs/026.pdf

Read 7, 9, 11-21, and 25. Granted 18 is a bit over the top with the death penalty, but the criminalization of profit is spot-on.

I trust you can locate the Democrat Party platform link by yourself.
Click to expand...

You're so off in your analysis:

So citizens of the state first, and then foreign nationals.
Now the Socialist Party USA
Link

#9 said:
All German Citizens must have equal rights and duties.
Click to expand...
Socialist USA said:
The Socialist Party is committed to the rights of free speech, free press, free assembly, and personal privacy, and the freedom of religious choice through the separation of church and state.
Click to expand...
Suppose citizenship might be a requirement, as well; so you might have found a similarity there.

I don't feel like continuing..

there is very little similarity. Nazi Germany and its so-called National Socialism is more like Darwinism where the State supports the master-race.
 
Southern Man said:
Hitler, the Socialist, was a big fan of nationalized health care.
Click to expand...

most of the first world has nationalised healthcare, does that make most of the first world socialist?

hitler, the Dog Lover, was a big fan of german shepherds
hitler, the Material Clad, was a big fan of clothes
 

spud_meister said:
most of the first world has nationalised healthcare, does that make most of the first world socialist?

hitler, the Dog Lover, was a big fan of german shepherds
hitler, the Material Clad, was a big fan of clothes
Click to expand...

Most of the first world is socialist.

We're not talking one unpolitical thing in common but 14 specific party platform points. Nice try though.
 
Seriously, How did a conversation about Racist White guys in love with Hitler get turned into a debate about socialism?
 
RyrineaHaruno said:



You read the title correctly, and I thought their wasn't anyone that stupid in the world. How is Hitler consider a Civil right leader? I am not sure, if this is right forum or not since it has history related stuff in it.
Click to expand...

There are three parts to this issue that you've brought up - one is a legitimate component and the other two are not.

The first part is the racist-factor that this guy displays and harbors against others.
The second part is his view of Hitler's acts in reflection of his racist beliefs.
These two are the illigitimate views.

The third part is a legitimate issue: the point that white people are not permitted to take any amount of 'pride' in their race or genealogy. This specifically draws attention to the hypocrisy behind the fact that all people of all non-white "cultures" or "races" are permitted to take pride, organize and otherwise support and further causes purely in the name of their "race" or "cultures" whereas white people are not permitted to do so blatantly.
Examples: There is a NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) and a BET (Black Entertainment Television) but there will never be a National Association for the Advancement of White People or a White Entertainment Television. Nor will there ever be a "Mens Movement" (in correlation to the Womens Movement)

My World Literature teacher who focused very heavily on the role of women in literature history - said that "It's acceptable for blacks, women and other minorities to have a movement because they've been oppressed. The movement marks a change for their entire group" - and white men "Don't get that privileged because they're the ones who took it away from that group to begin with"

So - the third issue, here, is separate from racism entirely - questioning the nature of society rather than focusing on *being* racist.
 
Caine said:
Seriously, How did a conversation about Racist White guys in love with Hitler get turned into a debate about socialism?
Click to expand...

Looks like post #5

Southern Man said:
Hitler, the Socialist, was a big fan of nationalized health care.
Click to expand...

I am not sure how the two fit together either. They seem like different issues to me.
 
Last edited:
Well, I get that, Im just confused on WHY the need to turn this into yet another "OMFG EVIL SOCIALIST BASTARDZ!" debate.
 
Caine said:
Well, I get that, Im just confused on WHY the need to turn this into yet another "OMFG EVIL SOCIALIST BASTARDZ!" debate.
Click to expand...

Also it is irrelevent. Hitler's policies may or may not have been socialist (not sure because I never cared enough to look) but that doesn't mean that socialism is bad, only that bad people can carry that philosophy. To put the two together to make that claim would be like saying capitalism is bad because of Pinochet.
 

Your not helping.

Your adding to the "OMFG EVIL SOCIALIST BASTARDZ" debate by even talking about socialism.
 
Caine said:
Your not helping.

Your adding to the "OMFG EVIL SOCIALIST BASTARDZ" debate by even talking about socialism.
Click to expand...

I know, but I can't help myself :mrgreen:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…