• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Some Racist whiteguy think Hitler is an civil right leader

RyrineaHaruno

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
1,827
Reaction score
409
Location
Humble Texas
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal



You read the title correctly, and I thought their wasn't anyone that stupid in the world. How is Hitler consider a Civil right leader? I am not sure, if this is right forum or not since it has history related stuff in it.
 
Last edited:

Korimyr the Rat

Baby Eating Monster
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
19,553
Reaction score
15,756
Location
Cheyenne, WY
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
White Supremacists consider Hitler to be a civil rights leader for his pioneering work in promoting the civil rights of the Aryan Race, at a time when Western Civilization was moving away from the natural and inherent privilege of Whites in favor of other, lesser races.

That's pretty much how the line goes. Never mind that he got Germany destroyed again and left half of it in the hands of the godless Slavic Communists.
 

Caine

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
23,344
Reaction score
7,210
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Some racist black guy thinks Al Sharpton is a civil rights leader. :roll:

Who is more accepted, Al Sharpton or Hitler?
 

Arch Enemy

Familiaist
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
7,470
Reaction score
2,085
Location
North Carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Some racist black guy thinks Al Sharpton is a civil rights leader. :roll:

Who is more accepted, Al Sharpton or Hitler?
al sharpton. There's no ****ing competition Caine.
 

Southern Man

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
2,219
Reaction score
296
Location
The Beautiful Yadkin Valley
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
You read the title correctly, and I thought their wasn't anyone that stupid in the world. How is Hitler consider a Civil right leader? I am not sure, if this is right forum or not since it has history related stuff in it.
Hitler, the Socialist, was a big fan of nationalized health care.
 

Caine

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
23,344
Reaction score
7,210
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
al sharpton. There's no ****ing competition Caine.
I know there isn't. But here is my point...

While Hitler was much much worse than Al Sharpton, Al Sharpton is a racist. Hitler was a racist. It is no surprise that racists view racist leaders as supporters of their prospective civil rights.

My point is this, BIG ****ING DEAL. Some racist white dude views Hitler as a civil rights leader. The fact that the jackass is a racist idiot already makes his views to be not taken seriously, so the fact that he views Hitler as a civil rights leader falls in line with that. Because nobody likes Hitler.
 

Southern Man

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
2,219
Reaction score
296
Location
The Beautiful Yadkin Valley
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Last edited:

Arch Enemy

Familiaist
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
7,470
Reaction score
2,085
Location
North Carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative

Arch Enemy

Familiaist
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
7,470
Reaction score
2,085
Location
North Carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
http://users.stlcc.edu/rkalfus/PDFs/026.pdf

Read 7, 9, 11-21, and 25. Granted 18 is a bit over the top with the death penalty, but the criminalization of profit is spot-on.

I trust you can locate the Democrat Party platform link by yourself.
You're so off in your analysis:

#7 said:
We demand that the State make it its duty to provide opportunities of employment
first of all for its own Citizens. If it is not possible to maintain the entire
population of the State, then foreign nationals (non-Citizens) are to be expelled
from the Reich.
So citizens of the state first, and then foreign nationals.
Now the Socialist Party USA
The Socialist Party stands for the right of all workers to organize, for worker control of industry through the democratic organization of the workplace, for the social ownership of the means of production and distribution, and for international solidarity among working people based on common opposition to global capitalism and imperialism. We believe that the international organization of labor is the only way of combating the exploitation of workers in a global capitalist economy. Working people have no country, but rather an international bond based on class. Workers throughout the world have far more in common with each other across national boundaries than with their bosses in their own countries. Ultimately a socialist revolution must be an international revolution that cannot survive if confined to individual countries amidst capitalist imperialism.
Link

#9 said:
All German Citizens must have equal rights and duties.
Socialist USA said:
The Socialist Party is committed to the rights of free speech, free press, free assembly, and personal privacy, and the freedom of religious choice through the separation of church and state.
Suppose citizenship might be a requirement, as well; so you might have found a similarity there.

I don't feel like continuing..

there is very little similarity. Nazi Germany and its so-called National Socialism is more like Darwinism where the State supports the master-race.
 

spud_meister

Veni, vidi, dormivi!
Dungeon Master
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 6, 2009
Messages
36,117
Reaction score
21,520
Location
Didjabringabeeralong
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Communist
Hitler, the Socialist, was a big fan of nationalized health care.
most of the first world has nationalised healthcare, does that make most of the first world socialist?

hitler, the Dog Lover, was a big fan of german shepherds
hitler, the Material Clad, was a big fan of clothes
 

Southern Man

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
2,219
Reaction score
296
Location
The Beautiful Yadkin Valley
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
You're so off in your analysis:


So citizens of the state first, and then foreign nationals.
Now the Socialist Party USA

Link


Suppose citizenship might be a requirement, as well; so you might have found a similarity there.

I don't feel like continuing..

there is very little similarity. Nazi Germany and its so-called National Socialism is more like Darwinism where the State supports the master-race.
most of the first world has nationalised healthcare, does that make most of the first world socialist?

hitler, the Dog Lover, was a big fan of german shepherds
hitler, the Material Clad, was a big fan of clothes
Most of the first world is socialist.

We're not talking one unpolitical thing in common but 14 specific party platform points. Nice try though.
 

Caine

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
23,344
Reaction score
7,210
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Seriously, How did a conversation about Racist White guys in love with Hitler get turned into a debate about socialism?
 

Aunt Spiker

Cheese
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
16,986
Location
Sasnakra
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Moderate



You read the title correctly, and I thought their wasn't anyone that stupid in the world. How is Hitler consider a Civil right leader? I am not sure, if this is right forum or not since it has history related stuff in it.
There are three parts to this issue that you've brought up - one is a legitimate component and the other two are not.

The first part is the racist-factor that this guy displays and harbors against others.
The second part is his view of Hitler's acts in reflection of his racist beliefs.
These two are the illigitimate views.

The third part is a legitimate issue: the point that white people are not permitted to take any amount of 'pride' in their race or genealogy. This specifically draws attention to the hypocrisy behind the fact that all people of all non-white "cultures" or "races" are permitted to take pride, organize and otherwise support and further causes purely in the name of their "race" or "cultures" whereas white people are not permitted to do so blatantly.
Examples: There is a NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) and a BET (Black Entertainment Television) but there will never be a National Association for the Advancement of White People or a White Entertainment Television. Nor will there ever be a "Mens Movement" (in correlation to the Womens Movement)

My World Literature teacher who focused very heavily on the role of women in literature history - said that "It's acceptable for blacks, women and other minorities to have a movement because they've been oppressed. The movement marks a change for their entire group" - and white men "Don't get that privileged because they're the ones who took it away from that group to begin with"

So - the third issue, here, is separate from racism entirely - questioning the nature of society rather than focusing on *being* racist.
 

tacomancer

Capitalist Social Democrat
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
41,714
Reaction score
22,299
Location
Akron
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Seriously, How did a conversation about Racist White guys in love with Hitler get turned into a debate about socialism?
Looks like post #5

Hitler, the Socialist, was a big fan of nationalized health care.
I am not sure how the two fit together either. They seem like different issues to me.
 
Last edited:

Caine

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
23,344
Reaction score
7,210
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Well, I get that, Im just confused on WHY the need to turn this into yet another "OMFG EVIL SOCIALIST BASTARDZ!" debate.
 

tacomancer

Capitalist Social Democrat
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
41,714
Reaction score
22,299
Location
Akron
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Well, I get that, Im just confused on WHY the need to turn this into yet another "OMFG EVIL SOCIALIST BASTARDZ!" debate.
Also it is irrelevent. Hitler's policies may or may not have been socialist (not sure because I never cared enough to look) but that doesn't mean that socialism is bad, only that bad people can carry that philosophy. To put the two together to make that claim would be like saying capitalism is bad because of Pinochet.
 

Caine

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
23,344
Reaction score
7,210
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Also it is irrelevent. Hitler's policies may or may not have been socialist (not sure because I never cared enough to look) but that doesn't mean that socialism is bad, only that bad people can carry that philosophy. To put the two together to make that claim would be like saying capitalism is bad because of Pinochet.
Your not helping.

Your adding to the "OMFG EVIL SOCIALIST BASTARDZ" debate by even talking about socialism.
 

tacomancer

Capitalist Social Democrat
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
41,714
Reaction score
22,299
Location
Akron
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Your not helping.

Your adding to the "OMFG EVIL SOCIALIST BASTARDZ" debate by even talking about socialism.
I know, but I can't help myself :mrgreen:
 
Top Bottom