I have personally struggled with the concept of term limits. We see the utter idiocy of some of the newcomers to Washington who have no clue of economics or history or any realistic kind of sense of cause and effect, let alone any real knowledge or expertise in identifying enemies of the USA both within and from the outside. There is a wealth of real solid expertise and knowledge currently in Congress and I don't know whether it is advisable to replace that with the know nothings. We could be electing a lot of incompetents who would be at the mercy of professional faceless bureaucrats who are elected by nobody and accountable to nobody.
If we could find a way to put a process in place to reduce or eliminate the ability of those elected to enrich themselves at our expense, perhaps only the truly committed public servants would choose to make a sort of career of Congress or at least would stick around long enough to mentor the know nothings coming in. But fat chance on getting them to agree to that system which would have to include:
1. They fund their 401K just like everybody else does and no tax dollars would ever be allowed for their retirement during or after their service. If it means increasing salaries because of the high cost of being in Washington DC, so be it.
2. They fund their own healthcare buying insurance on the open market just like the rest of us do.
3. They personally are subject to every regulation and law they pass. No exemptions.
4. Nobody in Congress would be able to take any kind of lobbyist job for 5, maybe 10 years after leaving Congress.
5. Congress will pass no law that benefits any person, group, demographic, etc. that does not benefit all. Humanitarian exception can be made when the government needs to intervene in a specific case; i.e. a congressional resolution to correct a specific injustice done to some individual, but the details and limitations on that could be worked out.
6. All federal courts will restrict their rulings to the existing law and Constitution. The court can rule a law is unconstitutional or incompatible with other existing laws with their reasons for the ruling, but it is up to the legislative body that passed it to then change the law. An unelected, unaccountable judge would not be allowed to make any law, negate any law, make any changes in any law. The issue would be clearly publicized, along with arguments as to why a court was likely wrong, so we the people could hold those we elected accountable to follow the Constitution. Congress or any other legislative body would not be able to use the federal courts to absolve them of their responsibility.
7. If members of Congress want to redecorate/refurbish/buy new stuff for their offices, they will need to pay for it out of pocket or raise the funds to do it. Otherwise they can make do with inexpensive and very austere basic government issue or choose something out of the acres of discarded furniture, etc. (We have acres and acres of warehouses filled with discarded perfectly good furniture, equipment, and decor as each new member of Congress buys all new stuff at taxpayer expense and does it again at intervals.)
8. Other than the basic operating expenses of the various departments of government (heat, light, phones, computers, etc.), the Congress will not bundle together bills for projects and various funding of services but will vote straight up or down ON THE RECORD each item they pass that costs the taxpayers money. And there will be no more provision for changing a vote after it is recorded as there is now, and they wont be able to 'revise and extend' their official remarks before the Senate or House as they can now.
There is no way in hell the Congress would pass those recommendations. But if they did, we would again be electing true public servants to high office who would serve for a time and then return home to live under the laws they pass as the Founders intended. Paul Ryan would likely have been a magnificent leader.
Instead we have a permanent political class, professional politicians who achieve high office, usually as middle class, and then leave it multi-millionaires many times over. Why else would they spend millions to get a job that pays less than $200k? They long ago stopped representing we the people. The only difference between them are the people they represent and they throw their respective constituencies just enough bones to keep them voting 'correctly' and spend most of their time benefiting themselves.
It's also fun seeing Trump rear end kissing in real life. Trump says it's Ryan's fault, and the followers say, "Of course it is, Dear Leader is never wrong! RYAN YOU SUCK!"
I think you're going to be disappointed. Dems are only interested in getting Trump, who had the audacity to challenge and beat their presumptive Queen. Revenge and destruction are their only motivations, not the national good or making life better for the nation.We knew that this was partially the problem. Though I must admit it was pretty shocking to see him go with so much in the works.
Many of us are just hoping the democrats are going to get this stick out of their rears pretty soon and try to work with the rest of congress.
Actually no....they are after not just bringing down Trump but also hurting Trump and everyone who did not condemn him at the proper time, reeducating all those who voted for him, and gaining the power in 2020 to run over all who dont agree with them as they make great stride to deliver the promise of UTOPIA.I think you're going to be disappointed. Dems are only interested in getting Trump, who had the audacity to challenge and beat their presumptive Queen. Revenge and destruction are their only motivations, not the national good or making life better for the nation.
Numerous comments on DP have asked why the GOP didn't seek border wall funding when they had full control of Congress. Turns out Trump wanted it in the 2017 Omnibus Spending Bill but Speaker Paul Ryan talked him out of it
Actually no....they are after not just bringing down Trump but also hurting Trump and everyone who did not condemn him at the proper time, reeducating all those who voted for him, and gaining the power in 2020 to run over all who dont agree with them as they make great stride to deliver the promise of UTOPIA.
A UTOPIA that won't ever be delivered, but as long as Congress can continue to increase its own power, influence, and personal wealth, they'll keep telling us they will get it done so that we keep voting them in. Paul Ryan was as good a guy as any of them, but he too was pretty much part of the permanent political class unwilling to put himself out there to lead on really hot button controversial issues. He is by no means unusual in that regard. I won't judge him as to his stated motive to leave congress to spend more time with his family because that may be true. But seeing the handwriting on the wall that the feckless Republicans would lose their majority in the House and he would no longer be Speaker probably factored into that. He and the Republicans have not served the President well.
UTOPIA is the place that can never be, when I say such things as "When we get to UTOPIA" I am speaking tongue in cheek.
Paul Ryan is a con artist and a liar, the fact that he was drafted as Speaker and even worse "He is the only one who can do the job" informs us on how low quality Congress has become. The quality has been dropping for 50-60 years.
In response Ryan would certainly remind you that he always spent as little time in Washington as possible, and I remind you that his refusal to invest in relationships in Washington greatly contributed to his lack of accomplishment....which are problems for you theory, though certainly with as corrupt as Washington is Ryan is individually extremely corrupt.I agree that the U.S. Congress has definitely deteriorated over recent decades, I don't think Paul Ryan is any more liar or con artist than most others and he is not as much as some. But Permanent Political Class he was and is meaning that the interests of those in government were put at the front of the line before any consideration is given to what is good for America and Americans.
LOL, Nope. I'm just surprised how many on the left either don't know or forget how Washington actually works. The President doesn't control Congress and can't force them to do anythiing, even if they're the same party nor are the leaders of the Senate or House paragons of intestinal fortitude or ideological purity. In no small measure we ended up with Trump because McConnell, Boehner and Ryan talked big time reform and controlling Obama's far left tendencies prior to elections and turned into lap dogs after.So what's your point? Trump's a clueless moron? Is that what you're trying to say? I mean Paul Ryan is dumb as **** so if he can outsmart you...
In response Ryan would certainly remind you that he always spent as little time in Washington as possible, and I remind you that his refusal to invest in relationships in Washington greatly contributed to his lack of accomplishment....which are problems for you theory, though certainly with as corrupt as Washington is Ryan is individually extremely corrupt.
As evidenced by "The Clintons can still raise a lot of money, we can't kick them to the curb!".It is relationships and ability to lead and mostly the ability to raise money that earns somebody the privilege of Speaker of the House. And as all things are relative, it is important to always be aware that should the President and Vice President be unable to serve, the Speaker of the House is third in line to become Chief Executive of the United States. Now seriously. If you had to choose between Ryan and Pelosi to be President, which one would you rather see there?
I think you're going to be disappointed. Dems are only interested in getting Trump, who had the audacity to challenge and beat their presumptive Queen. Revenge and destruction are their only motivations, not the national good or making life better for the nation.
As evidenced by "The Clintons can still raise a lot of money, we can't kick them to the curb!".
In a word: Corruption.
I am with you...
Did anyone ever claim building a wall was Trump's original idea? There have been stretches of walls along the border for years. Your mindless blather about Trump doesn't add much to your argument."Inside Trump’s circle, the power of illegal immigration to manipulate popular sentiment was readily apparent, and his advisers brainstormed methods for keeping their attention-addled boss on message. They needed a trick, a mnemonic device. In the summer of 2014, they found one that clicked. “Roger Stone and I came up with the idea of ‘the Wall,’ and we talked to Steve [Bannon] about it,” said Nunberg. “It was to make sure he talked about immigration.”..Bloomberg News
[FONT=PublicoText-Roman-Web, Georgia, Cambria, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The wall was not Trumps idea. He knows nothing and has no ideas of his own. The reality is that its a waste of money better spent on a variety of measures to secure the border and many points of entry. A P.O.T.U.S.'s #1 job requirement is the ability to persuade. Trump is a weak, weak, chaotic President who cannot even persuade members of his own party.[/FONT]
Did anyone ever claim building a wall was Trump's original idea? There have been stretches of walls along the border for years. Your mindless blather about Trump doesn't add much to your argument.
I think you're going to be disappointed. Dems are only interested in getting Trump, who had the audacity to challenge and beat their presumptive Queen. Revenge and destruction are their only motivations, not the national good or making life better for the nation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?