• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Skank Ann Coulter booed and jeered during hate-speech

Deegan said:
She was shouted down until she could not continue her speech, that is how her free speech was interupted. It is well known that you don't go to a speech, if all you are going to do is disrupt it, that's not free speech, it's talking out of turn. This was not their time to talk, so it's irrelevant what their reaction was. They can become popular, and do the things that allow them the pulpit, until then, they need to be quiet, and give the speaker her time. This is a college, thet place where free speech is supposed to be an all important right, they showed their hypocrisy, that is all.


Wasn't the majority speaking its mind when she got shouted down? I thought the latest conservate, right side mantra was that the majority should get to make the rules.
 
Gilluin said:
Wasn't the majority speaking its mind when she got shouted down? I thought the latest conservate, right side mantra was that the majority should get to make the rules.

The majority is not always right, history has shown that, but sometimes, majority does rule, it has to, or nothing gets done. In this case, these rude folks should have stayed home, they chose to come there, only to disrupt the speaker, and those who came to hear her. This is wrong, and it's not the appropriate time, or place, for their views, or childish antics. Shouting, you suck, you suck, this is far from constructive rebuttal, it's child's play, and not what I expect from intelligent young people, at one of our better colleges.
 
Deegan said:
The majority is not always right, history has shown that, but sometimes, majority does rule, it has to, or nothing gets done. In this case, these rude folks should have stayed home, they chose to come there, only to disrupt the speaker, and those who came to hear her. This is wrong, and it's not the appropriate time, or place, for their views, or childish antics. Shouting, you suck, you suck, this is far from constructive rebuttal, it's child's play, and not what I expect from intelligent young people, at one of our better colleges.



So if I understand you correctly, conservates only believe in majority rule on issues that they favor? And dislike majority rule when the majority is liberal?
 
Gilluin said:
So if I understand you correctly, conservates only believe in majority rule on issues that they favor? And dislike majority rule when the majority is liberal?

Not at all. This is not a case of majority at all, it's about some Nazi's disrupting a scheduled speaker at one of our colleges. It's about a lack of security and responsibility at said speech. It's about the left expecting their speakers be heard, but not allowing a speaker on the right their time. it's about a lot of things, but none that you have mentioned.:roll:
 
Ann Coulter is an incredible woman.She tells it like it is, plain and simple.

The incident at UConn reiterates how radical the left really is, and it gives Ann even more national exposure! I'm sure Ann is laughing all the way to the bank with the extra press she received, not to mention it'll probably land her a few more Cable News appearances to talk about the fools at UConn.

The best part is watching the libs get their panties in a twist over her, if she's such a skank and a lier, why are the libs putting so much effort into trying to discredit and harass her?
 
galenrox said:
Why thank you for the last part (sorry, I just got made a mod today, so I can do that now, and it's SO COOL!)

What you're failing to do is make the distinction between violating her freedom of speech and behaving inappropriately at a school function. These are students, they have no police powers, and thus they cannot deprive her of her freedom of speech. I agree that they acted in a way that is inappropriate, but it is in no way hypocritical (except for those wacky liberals who called this same **** when the whole Dixie Chicks thing went down, those people are the definition of hypocritical). I personally think if they wanted to make an ass of her, they could've been more clever about it. For example, last year William Kristol gave a speech at my school for the young republicans, so my buddy snuck in, and at question time he just kept asking questions about the Iran contra (and he damn near got lynched!). But also, if your speaking in front of an audience of mixed political beliefs, and you're saying things that are intended to **** off liberals (and don't you dare claim that that's not what Ann Coulter intends to do, cause I have seen her speak many times and she has NEVER said anything of merit, she is a public figure SOLELY to **** off liberals), you have to expect to get booed. You can't get all pissed off when you know there's a cause and effect relationship, and then you do the cause and the effect happens, that's
just ridiculous.

Our Colleges are mainly liberal that is no secret.Liberals claim,thats claim to be tolerant, believe in diversity, and opposed to censorship. So when they act like Nazi' S A troops,it don't look good. Liberals are mainly hypocrits that can't handle competition.Look at how the FOX TV channels scare the daylights out of liberals. I have 70 cable channel 2 belong to Fox .The majority are liberal to left. The fear Fox engenders in them is unbelievable.
 
GottaHurt said:
Ann Coulter is an incredible woman.She tells it like it is, plain and simple.

The incident at UConn reiterates how radical the left really is, and it gives Ann even more national exposure! I'm sure Ann is laughing all the way to the bank with the extra press she received, not to mention it'll probably land her a few more Cable News appearances to talk about the fools at UConn.

The best part is watching the libs get their panties in a twist over her, if she's such a skank and a lier, why are the libs putting so much effort into trying to discredit and harass her?

The same reason those on the right try to harass and discredit Michael Moore.

I really had nothing against the woman until I saw Peter Barnes kick her ass in a debate and I realized what an airhead she actually is.
 
Hoot said:
The same reason those on the right try to harass and discredit Michael Moore.

I really had nothing against the woman until I saw Peter Barnes kick her ass in a debate and I realized what an airhead she actually is.

ROTFLMAO........after suffering through Roger & Me, and Bowling for Columbine, Michael Moore discredits himself, like most of the Hollywood dribble crowd.

Ann Coulter an airhead? LEL....(laughing even louder)......you libs just can't handle a woman shoving the truth down your gullet.
 
I bet all you libs crying about Ms. Coulter never read one of her books. So much of open minds.
 
tr1414 said:
I bet all you libs crying about Ms. Coulter never read one of her books. So much of open minds.
lol, I was just waiting for you to drop a steamer like this!
What, so if we don't read every book written by a conservative author we're not open minded?

Fine, then what's good for the goose is good for the gander
Have you read any Howard Zinn lately? How about Thomas Frank? William S Burroughs? Noam Chomsky?

lol, but no, you should feel good, I mean, considering you're retarded, the fact that you've even figured out how to type is an amazing achievement, good for you!
 
GottaHurt said:
Ann Coulter is an incredible woman.She tells it like it is, plain and simple.

The incident at UConn reiterates how radical the left really is, and it gives Ann even more national exposure! I'm sure Ann is laughing all the way to the bank with the extra press she received, not to mention it'll probably land her a few more Cable News appearances to talk about the fools at UConn.

The best part is watching the libs get their panties in a twist over her, if she's such a skank and a lier, why are the libs putting so much effort into trying to discredit and harass her?

Why you ask?
Because ignorant ****ing **** sucking scum like you actually believe the horse-**** that comes out of her mouth and or her mind......

And if the crabs from her skank ass vagina could talk then you would believe them too...
( I throught that in there because I could, its the basement).

Seriously though.....

People on both sides are going to discredit the lying ass pundits (because they are on both sides, pundits appeal to the weak minded) in order to stop the weak minded individuals from following into a "trend" of public partisan opinion...... Unfortunately, It hasn't worked.
 
galenrox said:
lol, I was just waiting for you to drop a steamer like this!
What, so if we don't read every book written by a conservative author we're not open minded?
Actually tr1414 asked if you've ever read one of her books, not every book.

Glad I could keep you honest.
 
Caine said:
Because ignorant [edit][edit] scum like you actually believe the [edit] that comes out of her mouth and or her mind......
Actually, I always believed the things she said and wrote even before she said and wrote them. :cool:
 
galenrox said:
lol, I was just waiting for you to drop a steamer like this!
What, so if we don't read every book written by a conservative author we're not open minded?

Fine, then what's good for the goose is good for the gander
Have you read any Howard Zinn lately? How about Thomas Frank? William S Burroughs? Noam Chomsky?

lol, but no, you should feel good, I mean, considering you're retarded, the fact that you've even figured out how to type is an amazing achievement, good for you!


You must live under a rock. What the hell is wrong with people like you? What kills me is that your supposed to be so open-minded. Have fun reading Chomsky. Unreal.
 
galenrox said:
lol, I was just waiting for you to drop a steamer like this!
What, so if we don't read every book written by a conservative author we're not open minded?

Fine, then what's good for the goose is good for the gander
Have you read any Howard Zinn lately? How about Thomas Frank? William S Burroughs? Noam Chomsky?

lol, but no, you should feel good, I mean, considering you're retarded, the fact that you've even figured out how to type is an amazing achievement, good for you!

Sir, I'm going to have to give you a warning, let's be civil now.:rofl

Oh *****, this is the basement, well screw you then, you don't seriously read chomsky do you? I certainly hope not, drugs have fried your brain as it is.;)
 
KCConservative said:
Actually tr1414 asked if you've ever read one of her books, not every book.

Glad I could keep you honest.
The accusation is still proposterous, but thanks for keeping me honest!

To be perfectly frank, no I haven't read any of her books, cause I've heard her speak on many occasions, and considering the drivel that she spews out of her mouth on a regular basis, I think it's safe to assume that her books are just as worthless.
On the other hand, I do read books by conservative authors, actually one of my favorite books is "Give War a Chance" by PJ O'Rourke, and thus my point that using if you have or have not read books by one spectacularly pointless author as a litmus test for whether or not you are open minded is for the retarded, and tr1414 definately fits that mold (the retarded mold)
 
Deegan said:
Sir, I'm going to have to give you a warning, let's be civil now.:rofl

Oh *****, this is the basement, well screw you then, you don't seriously read chomsky do you? I certainly hope not, drugs have fried your brain as it is.;)
lol, whatever you say you ****ing drunkard!!!
**** no I don't read Chomsky, I don't like to read much as is, and so when I do read I tend to read more conservative books so I can better understand those I disagree with.
 
galenrox said:
lol, whatever you say you ****ing drunkard!!!
**** no I don't read Chomsky, I don't like to read much as is, and so when I do read I tend to read more conservative books so I can better understand those I disagree with.

Ahhhh, yes, that is what I do as well, and I can say I have yet to be impressed, much less converted.:lol:

Damn you, you had to remind me.....my aching f**king head.:3oops:
 
Deegan said:
Ahhhh, yes, that is what I do as well, and I can say I have yet to be impressed, much less converted.:lol:

Damn you, you had to remind me.....my aching f**king head.:3oops:
Yeah, liberals who write books tend to be a lot like Coulter, just stupid bullshit.
 
tr1414 said:
You must live under a rock. What the hell is wrong with people like you? What kills me is that your supposed to be so open-minded. Have fun reading Chomsky. Unreal.
Translation: duuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
retard.jpg
 
I'd bet $100 she's had at least two abortions and a lesbian affair.
 
vergiss said:
I'd bet $100 she's had at least two abortions and a lesbian affair.
wouldn't be suprised. If she wants even a shot at winning, she'd better choose a really liberal district with a retiring liberal congressman.
 
Back
Top Bottom