• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Shutting Down Freeways (the 101)?

Protests that inconvenience no one can and will be easily ignored.
 
Phys251 said:
Then you understand that people practicing civil disobedience have rights. Now apply that to the LA freeway blockers and you're all set! (y)
Click to expand...

Difference. Violence and the number being disrupted. Also, Citizens vs. Non-Citizens.
 
TangoNoCash said:
Protests that inconvenience no one can and will be easily ignored.
Click to expand...

If nobody cares about it maybe they shouldn't be allowed to do it.


.
 
Bodi said:
Apparently to you location matters... are you changing your mind now or are there exceptions? You seemed to want to call me out and now you are kinds backing down. Did I make your point seem silly?
Click to expand...
Your question was
"Do I qualify as relevant to you?"

My answer was
"Does it matter?"

The rest is you deciding I was answering some other question.


Bodi said:
But even though you have never been to Gaza you are free to comment about it? Kinda a double standard, is it not?
Click to expand...
I occasionally try to refrain from making statements which rely on my personal knowledge or experience when there is something better available
 
TangoNoCash said:
You don't think people should be allowed to protest. That's sad.
Click to expand...
We are talking about protesting on the freeway. You said maybe they shouldn’t be allowed to do it. What did I miss? Were they just protesting the wrong way in your eyes? The entire point of protest is to create a presence people can’t ignore.
 
TangoNoCash said:
We are talking about protesting on the freeway. You said maybe they shouldn’t be allowed to do it.
Click to expand...

Yeah, on the freeway. Maybe they should not be allowed to protest on the Freeway. What is wrong with that?

TangoNoCash said:
What did I miss? Were they just protesting the wrong way in your eyes? The entire point of protest is to create a presence people can’t ignore.
Click to expand...

Blocking freeways is illegal.


.
 
Simon W. Moon said:
lol

So, it's not about the numbers, but the location?

Disrupt millions of lives, but just not on the freeway.
Click to expand...

If it is not on the freeway how would they be disrupting millions of lives?

And Blocking traffic is not legal. Tee-hee hee. 🤭
 
Bodi said:
Yeah, on the freeway. Maybe they should not be allowed to protest on the Freeway. What is wrong with that?



Blocking freeways is illegal.


.
Click to expand...
Protesting not in a designated free speech zone is illegal. What's your point?
 
Bodi said:

Utter bullshit. Literally millions of people having their lives disrupted because of these treasonous sons of bitches... they should all be arrested, and immigration status checked.


,
Click to expand...

Lol you would have argued for deporting MLK Jr for clogging up the streets of Selma.

Or the Boston Tea Party for causing the minor inconvenience of throwing someone else's tea logistical supply chain into disarray.

Or hell, crying for the families of Redcoats whose lives were disrupted.

And you don't think kidnapping people off the streets disrupts people's ****ing lives also?
 
Bodi said:
Correct. I value the lives of law abiding citizens trying to live their lives than the quasi-terrorists supporting illegal immigrants.

Look, CA is a disaster. Can't arrest people stealing under $1,000, drugs done in the streets, and defecating... the problem for many, and you apparently, is that laws were not enforced for the past 25 years... and now they are and people are acting like victims. Those committing crimes ARE CRIMINALS, and ICE ain't going nowhere. Just listened to a huge interview with the head of ICE on KFI 650am. Also, lots of these arrests are done when authorities are looking into other things, like tax evasion of companies, hiring problems, etc... and then there are all these Illegal immigrants, which shows the illegality of the business.



They do not have a right to protest and shut down freeways. They are also coming armed to fight police. The police were overwhelmed. Fighting cops is not a sign of being a good immigrant or citizen.

.
Click to expand...

Half the people who grow your food are criminals. You seriously want to deport them all?
 
TangoNoCash said:
Protesting not in a designated free speech zone is illegal. What's your point?
Click to expand...

Blocking freeways disrupts millions of people and should not be tolerated...


.
 
multivita-man said:
Half the people who grow your food are criminals. You seriously want to deport them all?
Click to expand...

Where did I say deport them? They should all just be granted Citizenship.


.
 
StillBallin75 said:
Lol you would have argued for deporting MLK Jr for clogging up the streets of Selma.
Click to expand...

Where did I once mention the term Deported?

StillBallin75 said:
Or the Boston Tea Party for causing the minor inconvenience of throwing someone else's tea logistical supply chain into disarray.

Or hell, crying for the families of Redcoats whose lives were disrupted.

And you don't think kidnapping people off the streets disrupts people's ****ing lives also?
Click to expand...

Not millions of citizens... maybe that illegal immigrant's life?
 
Bodi said:
If it is not on the freeway how would they be disrupting millions of lives?
Click to expand...
Someone creative could probably come up with lots of ways.

Is there an acceptable way to disrupt the lives of millions of people in protest?



Bodi said:
And Blocking traffic is not legal. Tee-hee hee.🤭
Click to expand...

I thought it was understood and taken for granted that by its very nature, Civil DISobedience often involves breaking the law.

But, glad to have you bring it up for any listeners in the back who were unaware of what civil disobedience involves
 
Phys251 said:
Ah, so you get your talking points from AM radio. That explains a lot.



Very few if any are doing that. For those who might be, isn't that what 2A is for?
Click to expand...

Hates AM radio but endorses the actions that will have everyone listening to AM radio on the freeway stuck in traffic for five hours.

That's called giving Democrats enough rope to hang themselves with.
 
Bodi said:
Where did I say deport them? They should all just be granted Citizenship..
Click to expand...

Well they're not law-abiding citizens, according to your test.

Why should they be granted citizenship? On what grounds?

Maybe there's an intermediate step, which is to improve the immigration system to accommodate this apparent gap in the labor market, or continue looking the other way like we have for years because we know that their labor is more important than our legal purity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom