- Joined
- Apr 16, 2025
- Messages
- 362
- Reaction score
- 96
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
We should welcome all
And make poor and middle-class Americans pay for everything, right?
We should welcome all
I'm not arguing with you. I'm just trying to under your position.The constitution requires it. Amend it if you don’t like it.
Plyler v doe settled the education part. Reagan implemented the healthcare part. Congress could change that if they wanted to though.Neither health care nor education are mentioned as constitutional rights per se.
No. If Congress repealed Reagan’s EMTALA, then ER’s could require proof of citizenship and ability to pay before treating.Its the 14th that requires if we provide them statutorily to some, we must provide equally. ,
You're the troll. Obviously many here support open borders and so it is a worthy discussion.How? Nordic myth or fishing technique?
It isn’t my position. It’s constitutional law.I'm not arguing with you. I'm just trying to under your position.
Nobody who isn’t a citizen has the right to enter the US. Any non citizen can be turned away at point of entry for any reason. BUT, if they make it to US soil, the constitution requires they have a hearing before being removed.If a suspected terrorist from Afghanistan is denied entry, do you believe that he has the right to nevertheless enter the U.S. in order to argue his case before a judge?
We have free travel between states because we generally trust the culture and type of people who live there, which are guided by the federal government which has jurisdiction there. It's the same in Eurozone and why not every country is in it, even countries that are very white:Both America and the people we receive would be better if we had open borders. And I consider the vast majority of immigrants to be working class fellows.
We long ago figured out borders were nonsense, that is why we have open borders between the 50 states.
Europe also figured this out, and that is why they have the Eurozone.
The only real thing stopping open borders is really just racism.
The summary I read of plyler is confusing. Either Congress can refuse to fund education or it cannot because education is a fundamental right. I am not suggesting it can treat immigrants differently, I am suggesting it can decide treat everyone else, like it wanted to treat immigrants.Plyler v doe settled the education part. Reagan implemented the healthcare part. Congress could change that if they wanted to though.
No. If Congress repealed Reagan’s EMTALA, then ER’s could require proof of citizenship and ability to pay before treating.
It’s basically all or none. If you fund education, you have to fund it regardless of immigration status. If you choose to not fund education at all, that’s different.The summary I read of plyler is confusing. Either Congress can refuse to fund education or it cannot because education is a fundamental right. I am not suggesting it can treat immigrants differently, I am suggesting it can decide treat everyone else, like it wanted to treat immigrants.
Should anyone and everyone be permitted to emigrate to the U.S.?
Should they receive housing, medical care, food, education, and legal representation all paid for by current U.S. residents?
Should there be any reasons to disqualify a potential immigrant?
Both America and the people we receive would be better if we had open borders. And I consider the vast majority of immigrants to be working class fellows.
We long ago figured out borders were nonsense, that is why we have open borders between the 50 states.
Europe also figured this out, and that is why they have the Eurozone.
The only real thing stopping open borders is really just racism.
No, and we haven't had open borders in decades.
Nice post, but it's not racism, it's statism that's the problem. Statism is a religion (or very similar to one), and it's not going away anytime soon. The working man has no country, yet Marxists states have very, very secure borders. They treat emigration like treason and immigration like infiltration.
Also, true Marxism is stateless, and true working class solidarity is international.
We had the closest thing to open borders under the most recent Obama, er, Biden Administration.
Should anyone and everyone be permitted to emigrate to the U.S.?
Should they receive housing, medical care, food, education, and legal representation all paid for by current U.S. residents?
Should there be any reasons to disqualify a potential immigrant?
Should anyone and everyone be permitted to emigrate to the U.S.?
Should they receive housing, medical care, food, education, and legal representation all paid for by current U.S. residents?
Should there be any reasons to disqualify a potential immigrant?
Both America and the people we receive would be better if we had open borders. And I consider the vast majority of immigrants to be working class fellows.
We long ago figured out borders were nonsense, that is why we have open borders between the 50 states.
Europe also figured this out, and that is why they have the Eurozone.
The only real thing stopping open borders is really just racism.
Yes, workers should be allowed to cross any border that capital is allowed to cross.
It's anti-free market to prevent workers from competing
Of course... in fact, I will just give my house and land and property to illegal immigrants if it helps them.
,
Isn't that why we elect politicians, to speak for us?Should American citizens have any say in who gets to come and what they're entitled to receive?
Talk about a strawman!Not in our collective interest to be refusing to test and treat communicable diseases based on immigration status.
No we didn't. Stop lying.
If we had an open immigration system, they would not be “illegal” immigrants.