Islam4UK are apparently planning a march through Wootton Bassett. The significance of choosing Wootton Bassett, for those that are not familiar, is the town has put on 'an unofficial' repatriation ceremony for the home coming of British service men and women returning from Afghanistan.
BBC NEWS | UK | Thousands honour repatriated men
BBC News - Today - Should Islam4UK march in Wootton Bassett?
from there website:
Islam 4 UK Home page
LETTER: To the Families of British Soldiers who have died or who are currently in Afghanistan
the second paragraph down states:
"We begin by inviting all non-Muslims to Islam, the perfect and most beautiful way of life, a favour from Allah (God) to mankind to take him out of the darkness of worshipping his own desires to the exclusive worship, submission and obedience of Allah alone, without partners and to testify the Messenger-ship of the final Prophet Muhammad (may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). We urge you to embrace Islam and save yourselves and your family from the hellfire and not to believe the lies and distortions which the Western media and non-Islamic regimes would have you believe about Muslims and their true intentions. Islam means submission and the Muslim is the one who submits to the will of God in his life. Verily the Messenger Muhammad told us that whoever heard his name from the Jews and Christians and did not believe would be held accountable for that on the day of judgement."
Do you feel its appropriate to choose Wootton Bassett as the setting for the march?
Paul
Islam4UK are apparently planning a march through Wootton Bassett. The significance of choosing Wootton Bassett, for those that are not familiar, is the town has put on 'an unofficial' repatriation ceremony for the home coming of British service men and women returning from Afghanistan.
BBC NEWS | UK | Thousands honour repatriated men
BBC News - Today - Should Islam4UK march in Wootton Bassett?
from there website:
Islam 4 UK Home page
LETTER: To the Families of British Soldiers who have died or who are currently in Afghanistan
the second paragraph down states:
"We begin by inviting all non-Muslims to Islam, the perfect and most beautiful way of life, a favour from Allah (God) to mankind to take him out of the darkness of worshipping his own desires to the exclusive worship, submission and obedience of Allah alone, without partners and to testify the Messenger-ship of the final Prophet Muhammad (may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). We urge you to embrace Islam and save yourselves and your family from the hellfire and not to believe the lies and distortions which the Western media and non-Islamic regimes would have you believe about Muslims and their true intentions. Islam means submission and the Muslim is the one who submits to the will of God in his life. Verily the Messenger Muhammad told us that whoever heard his name from the Jews and Christians and did not believe would be held accountable for that on the day of judgement."
Do you feel its appropriate to choose Wootton Bassett as the setting for the march?
Paul
Hilarious! The idiots from Islam4UK are now claiming they’ve been the subject of death threats and bomb threats and have now cancelled their march for tomorrow in central London. Message posted on their website. I’ll write more tomorrow morning but I hope the counter-marches still go ahead.
What could be the legal justification for banning that Islam4UK protest?
Are there any kind of predictions as to the UK's action on this one? (Permission/no permission)Like in the US, local police have to give permission for such gatherings.. and if they think it is a security issue then no protest.
Until Britain develops a collective a backbone, these "in your face" displays will continue, and probably intensify.
Are there any kind of predictions as to the UK's action on this one? (Permission/no permission)
Since it seems the organisation cancelled the rally then I am guessing.. no action
But saying that depends on the day I guess. If there is a repatriation going on then I doubt that they would allow it. Too big a security risk. Plus there is the added fact of a near by RAF base and the security issues involved with that.. so who knows.
What could be the legal justification for banning that Islam4UK protest?
Can you source it, please?Since it seems the organisation cancelled the rally then I am guessing.. no action
Can you source it, please?
I didn't hear about it being canceled.
Can you source it, please?
I didn't hear about it being canceled.
Well they have targeted that area for a reason.
And while people may disagree with it, I see no purpose in banning the march. They should be free to assemble and associate as they see fit and if they want to publicly display their message, protest, or whatever; then they should be more than free to do that as well. I see no reason for banning the march.
None of that really has anything to do with the legitimacy of allowing them to march. There's no reason to prevent the march. Sure, they may be idiots; but where's the law against that? No one said anyone had to pay them any mind, but there's no real justification for barring the march in and of itself.
None of that really has anything to do with the legitimacy of allowing them to march. There's no reason to prevent the march. Sure, they may be idiots; but where's the law against that? No one said anyone had to pay them any mind, but there's no real justification for barring the march in and of itself.
But it does have a lot to do with the appropriateness of it, which was what the OP asked, though I know other people were talking about whether it could be banned.
How "appropriate" it is to have the march is inconsequential. That's going to depend on your opinion on the war. In general protest for or against can be given arguments for appropriateness. In the end, what it comes down to is "what can you do about it?". And the answer to that is "nothing".
If one were to honestly view the war in Iraq and Afghanistan as Western aggression towards the ME, the argument can be made that it is appropriate to protest at this site. It's a well known site where the bodies of soldiers are brought in, there will be publicity for protesting there. One can make the point that the actions of the West in the area disrespect the people of the area far more than a protest in a city could ever do. The dead are dead, but people make excuse to make more dead people which could be argued as being significantly worse than protest in the city. What these people intend to do is up to them and their cause. I merely said that arguments of appropriateness can be made for both sides of the argument. I thought reading would make that clear.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?