Should congressional pensions be cut or eliminated?
I believe they should get.Politics is a public service job. They shouldn't get hefty retirements, benefits and other ****.
Chris Cuomo's Give Me A Break: Congressional Perks - ABC News
Oh, so if they made laws that benefited their businesses or the people they really worked for it would be OK?Congressmen should have a negative wage. This would attract more honorable people to run.
Should congressional pensions be cut or eliminated?
I believe they should get.Politics is a public service job. They shouldn't get hefty retirements, benefits and other ****.
Chris Cuomo's Give Me A Break: Congressional Perks - ABC News
In a sense we already do. They set-up the current system, we know about it, and we keep re-electing them.I think what they have needs eliminated and something more fair to the American people be put in place. Let their constituents act as stock holders; let them decide what their bonuses and pensions are.
Congressmen should have a negative wage. This would attract more honorable people to run.
Eliminate them they are unconstitutional and a ponzai scheme....
I don't begrudge them the salaries they make. In spite of the perks they set for themselves, it is still a very stressful and difficult job that the average person would be unable to do. I just think the perks should be lessened and/or eliminated.I think they should just get Social Security retirements from their Congressional jobs. If they want to buy separate pension plans, that's fine. They should also be covered by the same health insurance as you and I, their constituents. How can they actually represent us unless they live in the same fishbowl that we do. Also they should recieve the same average National wage as the average constituent. Build dormitories so they can live away from home. Can the perks and move into mainstream life, same as us.
1) They should be reduced.
2) Congressmen should have to pay more of their own money into it.
3) Senators and Congressmen are under the same rules against insider trading as their staffs are.
Remember, Congressmen only get these pensions if they do 20 years of public service. That's a lot of years to devote, and they should get some kind of plan for it. After all, not every member of Congress is a millionaire.
However, members of Congress are not under rules against insider trading. While making laws regarding that kind of stuff, they are still allowed to use it when buying or selling stocks.
However, their staff members who have access to the same information aren't. Which gives members of Congress an incredibly undue advantage regarding the stock market.
So I'd rather Congressmen have pensions than allow them to do insider trading.
Congressional pension is a pension made available to members of the United States Congress. Members who participated in the congressional pension system are vested after five (5) years of service. A full pension is available to Members 62 years of age with 5 years of service; 50 years or older with 20 years of service; or 25 years of service at any age. A reduced pension is available depending upon which of several different age/service options is chosen. If Members leave Congress before reaching retirement age, they may leave their contributions behind and receive a deferred pension later.
I'm cynical, but I'm not that cynical. I believe that the vast majority of people who get into politics originally get in because they actually do care deeply and think that they can make positive change. I think they are corrupted after they are in, and that it happens slow enough that they don't even realize it, while others on the outside looking in can see the transformation.to OP:
That's why people run for office. Once their in, they know they are set for life.
I agree. I can not go to my boss and tell him this is my pay and benefits from now nor can most other employees.Elected officials should be no different. They like all other employees on the face of the planet should have to ask their bosses IE we the tax payers for raises and benefits.congressional benefits and wages are one of the things I think should be left for the public, by vote, to decide.
some generations would be willing to hand out generous benefits for congress, other may not be so generous...
I'm not big on allowing public servants to dictate their benefits to those whom are paying for them.
I tend to agree with this. I'd even take it a bit further.I think Congressional EXPENSES should be cut. At least in half. At present by their own figures, it costs over 2 million per year per congressman to keep them in office. Cutting this by half would be a start, both in reducing government cost, and establishing the seriousness of Congress to tackle the budget problem.
In today's world, there is no real reason why congress needs to fly in on Monday and fly out on Friday. A simple laptop and a stay at home congressman could accomplish the same thing. There are other perks to this system. Citizens would have easier access to their representatives, and lobbyists and special interest groups access would be more difficult.
To the original post, I would include pension expenses in congressional expenses.
I tend to agree with this. I'd even take it a bit further.
1. Sessions would be shortened. Three, maybe four months, max. Split into two equal time frames twice a year. The rest they do in their home districts via computer. They should be spending time in their home districts anyway. They are "citizen legislators", aren't they?
2. Relating to #1, they get FOUR plane tickets (Coach) per year. Two to Washington, two home. Obviously, for the start and end of each session. Any extra trips are out of their own pockets.
As far as having constituents decide pay and benefits? That's one of those things that looks good on paper, but would be way too unwieldy to be practical. Plus, if we can get them back to being more like citizen legislators again, they should get some kind of stability.
The four ticket rule is my idea of how it should be. It's not actually a rule now.I don't think my post addressed the issue of who pays for flight, but I am not aware of the 4 ticket rule. No saying you're wrong, just that I don't know. I would be interested in knowing where that rule is found.
I don't see how the constituents deciding pay and benefits would be that complicated. I'll propose the following legislation:
"Each congressman shall be given the sum of $750,000 (or some other figure) to use as they see fit to conduct congressional business. All expenses, including salaries, pensions, office expenses, travel, and any other expenses shall be paid from that fund."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?