• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Should Ann Coulter run for Congress?

Should Ann Coulter run for Congress?

  • YES

    Votes: 10 21.7%
  • NO

    Votes: 32 69.6%
  • NO, she should wait and run for president in 08

    Votes: 4 8.7%

  • Total voters
    46
Indy said:
No kidding, but it is a tad entertaining to make him "admit" to his lies, or at leaste watch him wiggle around them.

True, true, it's the kind of entertainment that you just can't get anywhere else.

I've given Michael Moore the exact same treatment as I have Ann Coulter, that is, I've looked up both their supporters and those who hate them. And I can safely say that I am no Michael Moore fanboy, I diagree with him on a good many of his statments. But I think Ann Coulter is an all around less sensible person that Moore, judging from her statments and actions. Anyone want examples?


Duke
 
teacher said:
Stop listen to the talking heads. Think dammit.
I'm not listening to any talking heads. YOU think damnit..


One of the reasons Osama attacked us, and this is on record Caine, is that he thought America was a bunch of ******s. And given the behaivior and responce from YOUR boy Clinton, he had a damn good reason to think that.
MOre garbage from a piece of the same.
But he is a stupid Arab.
One thing we agree on...
No, YOU shutup.
The sad fact of the matter is you get your views from Hanity and Colmes, in your case you stand and pump your fist when Colmes spews.
Really? What are you some kind of sick freak who peeks between the blinds on my windows or something. Don't EVER make a statement you can't backup. You should know better, your teacher of the massive brain are you not? It would appear to me that you are just an amateur.
Here's your first assignment young man.
I don't take assignments from amateurs.

Listen up you red beret wearing glorified grunt, the enemy is determined, bolstered by ignorance, information control, and above all, religion. here are some truths I dare you to question...

The enemy wants to kill us. Period.
No ****, thats what an enemy does.

There are three things we can do about this.
Oh Boy.. El Genio to the rescue!

1. Die. Then you friggin libs will scream, why didn't Bush do anything? Not Clinton.
Gay.

B. Kill them all. Politically and morally unsavory.
*shrug*

III. Change their mind set, their way of life, the information they receive. Like in Iraq, cause junior, this is NOT about oil, or WMD's, this is about a long term beyond your ability to see changing the mind set of an entire civilization of savages. only one way to do that. Free the women. They'll do the rest.
Apparently you are showing how much of an amateur you are again. I haven't said that this is about oil. I was TOLD (by GWB) this was about WMDs and the safety of the U.S. I might have been mistaken.

CoW.boy's first post 9/11 speach he said "stay the course". He has not wavered one bit. He's been the same since. This thing will take generations.
At the cost of generations........ Just to, in a sense, "brainwash" people of another culture........... (I await insults from idiots who speak before thinking for this remark).

You know son, you go right ahead and live in your little world where you think that the first nuke Iran gets is NOT going to Tel Aviv, the second NYC, the third DC, the fourth LA, the fifth Chicago. I wonder where the sixth will go. That's ALL I wonder. I used to wonder where the fourth and fifth would go. Until I talked to Gunny. Not often teacher gets taught.
Wow, you really ARE and amateur. I haven't said that anywhere. Are you certain your not being taught by Navy Pride too?

Something else I want you to do.
I don't follow orders from amateurs.

Now, do you wanna be a man and let me walk you through this, no matter how ugly this gets for you, or are you gonna go hide for a while just like you always do when I come calling on you?
More childish rantings from an amateur.

Im through here.....
 
Navy Pride said:
What are you talking about? Did I strike a nerve? Who did I defame? Isn't Moore a hero of the Left?:confused:

Dude, he's right. You label people you don't agree with all the time. You call them "typical liberals", or what is in reailty an extremist liberal. Sometimes you call them a nut-job or extremist. When is the last time I called you a typical conservative? A red neck? I never have and never will.

You're right about Moore, hes the left's equivalent to Coulter, just less in your face and more subtle with his lies. Also, the democratic party is stupid... 'nuff said about why they gave him a seat.

I don't understand how anyone could defend these liars, such as Coulter and Moore. All they say is the other side is using lies and slander, WHEN THEY ARE USING LIES AND SLANDER THEMSELVES!!!
 
Actually, she already tried to run once in Connecticut, as a Libertarian, to get back at a R.I.N.O. who voted to let Bill Clinton stay in office. The Libertarians there were fine with her candidacy except for the fact that she wouldn't make supporting drug legalization her central issue, so they booted her.

But as for the general question, sure, I'd love to see her run a House seat, just not anything higher. Her books are filled with ammunition that can be easily verified and she constantly makes conservatives re-think points they formerly thought had to be conceeded to liberals.
 
Indy said:
Do you ever get tired of being so ignorant? Okay I'll help you out, show me one post where I praised the guy, hell show me one post where I mentioned him in any other context other than that he is an extremist liberal. If you fail to do this then we will all know your speak out of the hole in the lower extemities of your body.


He is a hero of the left........Even though you would never admit it I bet you shelled out $10. to see Farenheit 9/11 that movie full of 59 lies......Since your a closet liberal you won't admit it......
 
Duke said:
True, true, it's the kind of entertainment that you just can't get anywhere else.

I've given Michael Moore the exact same treatment as I have Ann Coulter, that is, I've looked up both their supporters and those who hate them. And I can safely say that I am no Michael Moore fanboy, I diagree with him on a good many of his statments. But I think Ann Coulter is an all around less sensible person that Moore, judging from her statments and actions. Anyone want examples?


Duke

Why don't you two liberals get a frigging room for your love fest or PM each other.....Lets try for once to stay on topic.........Thanks......
 
Sir_Alec said:
Dude, he's right. You label people you don't agree with all the time. You call them "typical liberals", or what is in reailty an extremist liberal. Sometimes you call them a nut-job or extremist. When is the last time I called you a typical conservative? A red neck? I never have and never will.

You're right about Moore, hes the left's equivalent to Coulter, just less in your face and more subtle with his lies. Also, the democratic party is stupid... 'nuff said about why they gave him a seat.

I don't understand how anyone could defend these liars, such as Coulter and Moore. All they say is the other side is using lies and slander, WHEN THEY ARE USING LIES AND SLANDER THEMSELVES!!!

Again now concentrate like a laser beam.........Liberals always deny they are one....People like him made Moore a millionaire with his lies........
 
Navy Pride said:
Lets try for once to stay on topic.........Thanks......
Okay.... then why are you going off on tangents about Michael Moore?

I thought you wanted to stay on topic. :doh
 
Navy Pride said:
Again now concentrate like a laser beam.........Liberals always deny they are one....People like him made Moore a millionaire with his lies........

Just because I don't identify with another liberal (a fat, socialist one) doesn't mean you can call him something and also mean me at the same time. There is a big difference between slightly liberal, and extremist liberal, just like there is for conservatives. Sorry that I don't call you names and mis-represent you. I can start if you'd like?

I am slightly a social liberal, and when it comes to the economy I am slightly conservative I balance it out and consider I mainly focus on social aspects and call myself a slightly liberal.

I don't expect you to reasonably respond and stop labeling people you disagree with.
 
Navy Pride said:
He is a hero of the left........

But does this mean that if you are left, he is your hero? Use that brain I hope you have!


Duke
 
Navy Pride said:
Why don't you two liberals get a frigging room for your love fest or PM each other.....Lets try for once to stay on topic.........Thanks......

Nothing like a little stream of hateful libel bleeding from the right...

Also, what I said was very on topic. What you said, on the other hand, was not.


Duke
 
Navy Pride said:
He is a hero of the left........Even though you would never admit it I bet you shelled out $10. to see Farenheit 9/11 that movie full of 59 lies......Since your a closet liberal you won't admit it......

Lol! NP you are great. Didn't you just say oh I don't know, 5 or so posts ago that people shouldn't LABEL others? So you can't beat me on ideas or facts so you resort to trying to label me as a liberal, as if that was a negative thing anymore than labeling somebody as religous would be. And as for me shelling out 10 bucks for the movie, how on EARTH would you know what I spend my money on? Have you been talking to Bush and looking at my bank statements? Also, could you at least TRY to debate without conceding defeat by labeling others? Don't you realize that this makes you look ignorant to the rest of the DP community? How does slapping a label on somebody help your argument?
 
Navy Pride said:
Again now concentrate like a laser beam.........Liberals always deny they are one....People like him made Moore a millionaire with his lies........

Hmm, did you ever stop to think that the people who deny being liberal might actually, oh I don't know, NOT BE A LIBERAL? How many times do you need to be embarrased before you will realize that simple fact that even a child can understand? Here's a little tidbit that might help you remember, just because somebody doesn't agree with progressive ways like changing the constiution and redefining old laws, or changing the intent of existing ones, that doesn't mean that they are a liberal. They might actually think for themselves.
 
ptsdkid said:
Congressman Mark Foley of Florida is stepping down from his position. Ann Coulter just happens to live in Foley's district of Florida. Republicans need all the wins possible come November. She would be a shoe in if she were to run for Congress.

Ann should run, we need more people like her to raise our awareness and encourage debate. None of this move to the center b.s.

Let's keep on the offensive and bring America back to what it used to be. Let's bring Ann into the fray, where ever she can help the ...I doo dood in my pant's left grow up...We don't need to be nice, we need to be firm parent's with tough love.
 
Awesome! said:
Ann should run, we need more people like her to raise our awareness and encourage debate. None of this move to the center b.s.

Let's keep on the offensive and bring America back to what it used to be. Let's bring Ann into the fray, where ever she can help the ...I doo dood in my pant's left grow up...We don't need to be nice, we need to be firm parent's with tough love.

LOL! Oh wait, are you serioius?
 
Indy said:
LOL! Oh wait, are you serioius?

Of course I'm serious. I'm reading her how to talk to a liberal book, and she is making some good points of the lack of efficiency of our government, which I agree with. Refreshing harshness too, which we need more of, because we need to get past this pc b.s. that is limiting our effectiveness.
 
Awesome! said:
Of course I'm serious. I'm reading her how to talk to a liberal book, and she is making some good points of the lack of efficiency of our government, which I agree with. Refreshing harshness too, which we need more of, because we need to get past this pc b.s. that is limiting our effectiveness.


read "Treason"

its a much better book and is full of facts on how the left rewrote history regarding Joseph McCarthy.

I didnt like "How to talk to a liberal" very much. Kind of boring IMO.
 
Navy Pride said:
He is a hero of the left........Even though you would never admit it I bet you shelled out $10. to see Farenheit 9/11 that movie full of 59 lies......Since your a closet liberal you won't admit it......

I've seen this movie, and I paid ten bucks to do so. I'm a Republican. Going to see or hear the other side's point is part of learning and challenging yourself and others. Just because one attends such a function doesn't make them an extremist of anything, it simply makes them curious.

As for the nature of this thread (which now appears to be more about Navy Pride's credibility or lack thereof), I'd have to say I've had a few discussions with you myself, NP, and at no time have you ever shown yourself to be enlightened, reasonable, or fair. You'd rate among the highest in terms of being quick to throw labels on people, even people that would support you if you weren't so extreme yourself. I don't know how many times you have wrongly accused me of being a liberal (with slanderous intent or insinuations) simply because I didn't buy into the "Any farther right and you'd have to be Hitler" party line.

Navy... Not everyone to the left of you is a communist. Not everyone who disagrees with you is an extremist. Maybe they're simply rational and reasonable, and see the world as you cannot.
 
Awesome! said:
Of course I'm serious. I'm reading her how to talk to a liberal book, and she is making some good points of the lack of efficiency of our government, which I agree with. Refreshing harshness too, which we need more of, because we need to get past this pc b.s. that is limiting our effectiveness.

Now do you think that the bold portion is only the liberals fault?
 
ProudAmerican said:
read "Treason"

its a much better book and is full of facts on how the left rewrote history regarding Joseph McCarthy.

I didnt like "How to talk to a liberal" very much. Kind of boring IMO.

Will do, I like her approach. Just started htttaliberal, but wil check out Treason next. I don't know much about Mccarthy except for the witchhunt he apparently led against communists, or perceived communists back in the 50's or 60's? so curious to know if there is another side to all of this?

Ann should run and maybe Bill O'reilly, but they are both making too much money doing what they do now. Congress would have to pay more.
 
Awesome! said:
Will do, I like her approach. Just started htttaliberal, but wil check out Treason next. I don't know much about Mccarthy except for the witchhunt he apparently led against communists, or perceived communists back in the 50's or 60's? so curious to know if there is another side to all of this?

Ann should run and maybe Bill O'reilly, but they are both making too much money doing what they do now. Congress would have to pay more.

Do you think that either of them would stand a chance to win?
 
I would totally love to see Ann run for Congress! :lol:
 
Indy said:
Now do you think that the bold portion is only the liberals fault?

Yes, liberal thinking whether a liberal repub or dem etc. doesn't matter. My father mentioned the other day that he only paid 6% of his check to our government way back when. What the hell went wrong? Any ideas are acceptable to me. Ann's opinion is that liberals are the problem, and maybe she's right?
 
Indy said:
Do you think that either of them would stand a chance to win?

I don't know, but it would be interesting for them to get some applied knowledge, rather than just having an opinion on the sidelines. They seem successful at what they do, so I wouldn't under estimate them.
 
Awesome! said:
I don't know, but it would be interesting for them to get some applied knowledge, rather than just having an opinion on the sidelines. They seem successful at what they do, so I wouldn't under estimate them.

You know, thats a completely fair and logical way of looking at it. Well done. It would be interesting to see if their views or stances change once they are actually in the trenches. After all its easy to be the peanut gallery but to actually be the contender is another story.
 
Back
Top Bottom