Grokmaster
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2017
- Messages
- 9,613
- Reaction score
- 2,735
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Sheriff blames sanctuary law for California officer's death
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A suspected drunken driver accused of killing a California police officer who pulled him over was captured Friday as he tried to flee back to Mexico, where he lived before illegally crossing into the U.S., authorities said.
The sheriff leading the investigation blamed California's sanctuary law for preventing local authorities from reporting Gustavo Perez Arriaga to U.S. immigration officials for two previous drunken driving arrests. If he had been deported, the sheriff said, Cpl. Ronil Singh of the tiny Newman Police Department would still be alive.
"We can't ignore the fact that this could have been preventable," Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson told reporters, asking why the state was "providing sanctuary for criminals (and) gang members. It's a conversation we need to have."
Perez Arriaga crossed the border in Arizona several years ago and had worked a variety of jobs as a laborer, including at several dairies. The 33-year-old Mexico native had gang affiliations and multiple Facebook pages with different names, Christianson said.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/...r-killing-suspect-us-illegally-064549207.html
A LEGAL IMMIGRANT, working for the community, an asset to the community, the kind of immigrant every American wants to come here, BRUTALLY MURDERED by an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT, with a prior criminal record, who by rights should never have even been here.
Guess which one California law, (and by extension, the Illegal-o-crats overall ), provides SPECIAL PROTECTIONS FOR?
Sheriff blames sanctuary law for California officer's death
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A suspected drunken driver accused of killing a California police officer who pulled him over was captured Friday as he tried to flee back to Mexico, where he lived before illegally crossing into the U.S., authorities said.
The sheriff leading the investigation blamed California's sanctuary law for preventing local authorities from reporting Gustavo Perez Arriaga to U.S. immigration officials for two previous drunken driving arrests. If he had been deported, the sheriff said, Cpl. Ronil Singh of the tiny Newman Police Department would still be alive.
"We can't ignore the fact that this could have been preventable," Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson told reporters, asking why the state was "providing sanctuary for criminals (and) gang members. It's a conversation we need to have."
Perez Arriaga crossed the border in Arizona several years ago and had worked a variety of jobs as a laborer, including at several dairies. The 33-year-old Mexico native had gang affiliations and multiple Facebook pages with different names, Christianson said.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/...r-killing-suspect-us-illegally-064549207.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
View attachment 67246873
How, exactly, did this guy have a valid, state issued, drivers license? From the link it appears that he had used multiple (valid?) IDs. Has anyone checked to see if he was registered to vote, who had employed him, if that ID (those IDs?) would pass E-Verify and if there was a federal detainer issued for him?
Obviously, our interior enforcement of federal immigration law is failing miserably.
How, exactly, did this guy have a valid, state issued, drivers license? From the link it appears that he had used multiple (valid?) IDs. Has anyone checked to see if he was registered to vote, who had employed him, if that ID (those IDs?) would pass E-Verify and if there was a federal detainer issued for him?
Obviously, our interior enforcement of federal immigration law is failing miserably.
You're asking good questions here, and I hope answers will be forthcoming.
Yes, it is. As long as illegals are protected by 'sanctuary cities', there is no enforcement within those areas.
Huh...who'd a thunk.
You're asking good questions here, and I hope answers will be forthcoming.
Really. You're gonna promote that OP. That ****ed up, asshat, font crazy, total partisan, usually fake news OP. And you're cheerleading. Ain't that something.
Hey Grok, did this sheriff think that Melania was the only first lady to visit a war zone since 1969? :lamo
How, exactly, did this guy have a valid, state issued, drivers license? From the link it appears that he had used multiple (valid?) IDs. Has anyone checked to see if he was registered to vote, who had employed him, if that ID (those IDs?) would pass E-Verify and if there was a federal detainer issued for him?
Obviously, our interior enforcement of federal immigration law is failing miserably.
Really. You're gonna promote that OP. That ****ed up, asshat, font crazy, total partisan, usually fake news OP. And you're cheerleading. Ain't that something.
Please share. What is "fake" in the OP?
There are plenty of threads in which to discuss any aspect of the event or issues. You needn't promote trash.
E-verify is not mandatory in California except for certain cases (Federal contracts, etc.)....
And sanctuary means not informing internal immigration about illegal immigrants breaking our laws....
So long as doing nothing (differently) gets congress critters re-elected at a rate of over 90% then only fools should expect any changes.
California is now a bulletproof (supermajority in both legislatures) Democrat state.... That is why no mandatory E-verify. That is why so many sanctuary cities. That is why many a local municipality gets away from coordinating with ICE.
Answers won't be forthcoming. Like the rest of these incidents, this will be page 19 news in a few weeks. He'll be deported 5 feet from the border and return. Sanctuary everything will continue as usual. A new similar incident will replace it.
Meanwhile, a kid will steal his mom's legal guns and kill a few kids, and all guns must be banned.
Since illegal immigrants are counted in the census then their (growing?) presence gives CA extra "bright blue" House seats and EC votes. I'm sure that other federal perks (block grants to the states?) are also based on population totals which are padded with illegal immigrants.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?