- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 83,708
- Reaction score
- 58,417
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Yeah. It's all the directors fault.
Not looking good for Walker. I think things just got better for Warnock.
Maybe Walker is just a liar and unfit for public office. I hope this wakes people up to how they've been lied to.Maybe she didnt tell him what it was for. Maybe she just told him she was sick and couldnt afford to go to the doctor so he gave her money. We dont know who this woman is or her motives or her veracity. Anyone can come out a month before an election and make claims. She needs to come forward.
He'd be in like Trump. Dumb 'specific' reference.
As the source and story can't be verified, I don't see there is a move to make.
Not defending the guy, he has 4 children by 4 different women so I doubt his family values claim.
All the time, I'm a writer. Are you capable of debating w/o hurling insults?Ever have an original thought?
3 now. lolGod damn it. Twice auto spell got me.
Gernetic
Of course you would say this..what else is new.My favorite part of the article:
It's pretty clear she is a liar. She is trying to cause trouble. She is doing it in an uncivil manner. She isn't doing anything in the background.
She also claims to be hiding behind anonymity to protect her child but she drops lots of hints to her identity. It will not take much to out her if somebody wanted to.
Also these new details vast more doubt on the accuracy of her version of the story.
It is totally plausible that he had no idea why she was not feeling well afterward and sent the mother of his child a get well card along with a check to help her with household expenses while she was not well.
Do not believe all women because ones like have big credibility problems.
Look at you trying to change the subject.Isn't "Reverend" Warnock's position on this issue just a teenie bit hypocritical? Just sayin...
Well of course because it's not your brand of crazy conspiracy you dismiss it.I agree this is just getting stupid at this point. This has just become one of the MANY election time - I had or claim to have had a previous relationship with this person and I want to hurt them now because I hold a grudge against them, disagree with them politically, and/or someone is paying me a lot to engage in this tactic. It's just stupid.
I don't care if they had a a long or short term relationship, had sex, or had a baby. These are all things quite common in many a man/woman relationship. This is just another -
Lol..God it's like you all want to show off how much you don't know.I certainly think it has the potential of backfiring from its intent - a pretty big potential.
Man you are really trying here with the buzzwords..wonder if it workedWalkers mistake was becoming a conservative. Had he stayed on the liberal plantation, he could impregnate as many women as he pleased and have as many abortions as he wanted and be hailed as a leftist hero.
They love to make trolling nonsense posts....Man you are really trying here with the buzzwords..wonder if it worked
Its not stupid. None of you are criticizing him for his behavior. His crime in your eyes is hypocrisy and that is only a crime because he is on the right. If he were on the left, you wouldnt give a crap about any of the things you are faking outrage over.
No it makes sense. He is race baiting with his plantation talk. He wants one of us to lose it and yell at him.They love to make trolling nonsense posts....
Oops.It's not just The Daily Beast anymore. The woman has talked to the NYT.
Woman tells New York Times Herschel Walker asked her to have second abortion | CNN Politics
The woman who said Georgia Senate hopeful Herschel Walker paid for her 2009 abortion, setting off a controversy that has rocked his campaign, told The New York Times that the Republican nominee asked her to terminate a second pregnancy two years later.www.cnn.com
Dude sometimes a liar is just a liar and you just have to cut the cord.Is there nothing you did or believed when you were younger that you see as wrong today? I know numerous people who have changed their views on abortion over time. I am one of them
Do you care?Right. You dont care that he paid for abortions. You dont care that he had children out of wedlock or that he was a bad father. You care that he is on the right and opposes the one true sacrament of liberalism
Oh course and if this was a dem you would be on here spouting some wild ass mtg style conspiracy blah blah blah...How would I possibly know who is or isn't telling the truth and about none, some or all parts of the story. So far, all we have is an (as yet) anonymous woman telling one story and then adding another, days later - 1 month before an election.
The only thing which is glaringly clear to me is this is a timed tactic.
As far as the story, if true, I don't see any problem with any of it. A man and woman slept together and a pregnancy occurred. So did an abortion. Then a man and a woman slept together and a pregnancy occurred. So did a birth. If all of that is true - okay. I don't see a single newsworthy thing in any of it.
Whether it's true or not, I do wonder if any outside prompting/payment convinced the woman to tell the story/stories. And whether true or not - I think the whole thing is a very worn out and sleazy tactic. While I think all elements of the stories (even if true) are simply not newsworthy, I do hope the blatant and overused tactic backfires badly. I'm sick of this overused game.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?