oldreliable67
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2005
- Messages
- 4,641
- Reaction score
- 1,102
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
ShamMol said:What about those who did not choose to immigrate and were born Muslim there. Do you expect them to just leave their home country and go to a place where they have never been before in the Middle East?
And on that note, is it wrong for a state in Middle East to practice religious intolerance and would you accept it if you lived there (or born a citizen there)?
First, if they are born in a country whose religous (in)tolerance offends them deeply, they have three choices: one, immigrate, like millions have done before them; two, work - peacefully - to change the laws and public conciousness concerning their religous sensibilities in the country in which they live, whether they were born there or not; or three, resort to violence to get their way. The radical Islamists have clearly chosen door number three.
Second, religous leaders (imams, in this case) have a role to play here, do they not? What should an imam in a secular state do, counsel acceptance of the laws of the states of which they are citizens even if they are frowned upon in Islam, or counsel rebellion and violence? Clearly, the ME madrassahs have chosen rebellion and violence, but does that extend to the religous schools in secular states? Sounds very much like it has.
Doesn't this question get right to the nut-cutting of radical Islamists teachings...anyone that is not Muslim is an Infidel and is to be killed?