- Joined
- Jan 5, 2016
- Messages
- 6,917
- Reaction score
- 2,930
- Location
- Richmond, VA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
In a speech yesterday, Bernie said Hillary is "unqualified" to be President because her superpac accepted big special interest money. This is a serious error. If he keeps it up Bernie is going to lose supporters. Like me.
In a speech yesterday, Bernie said Hillary is "unqualified" to be President because her superpac accepted big special interest money. This is a serious error. If he keeps it up Bernie is going to lose supporters. Like me.
In a speech yesterday, Bernie said Hillary is "unqualified" to be President because her superpac accepted big special interest money. This is a serious error. If he keeps it up Bernie is going to lose supporters. Like me.
In a speech yesterday, Bernie said Hillary is "unqualified" to be President because her superpac accepted big special interest money. This is a serious error. If he keeps it up Bernie is going to lose supporters. Like me.
Maybe you don't realize where this came from. It started with an interview Hillary did where they asked her if Bernie was qualified. She refused to answer that and then went on to say she doesn't think Bernie is even a democrat. Which is a convenient thing to push going into New York, a closed primary where only democrats can vote. If she's going to play the victim here alls I can say is she shouldn't be casting stones from that glass house of hers.
is previous 16 years in the House of Representatives make him the longest serving independent member of Congress in American history.
In a speech yesterday, Bernie said Hillary is "unqualified" to be President because her superpac accepted big special interest money. This is a serious error. If he keeps it up Bernie is going to lose supporters. Like me.
Besides, this foolish focus on who is elected to sit in the Oval Office is silly.
Noone who warms that chair has much say in actual politics.
The REAL shots are called by those holding the Gold. He who holds the Gold....remember the saying?
No matter who you "feel warm and fuzzy" voting for is inconsequential at days end.
Want to change America? Look for ways to change the flow of cash and who has it
People are so distracted and silly in their notions.
In a speech yesterday, Bernie said Hillary is "unqualified" to be President because her superpac accepted big special interest money. This is a serious error. If he keeps it up Bernie is going to lose supporters. Like me.
Hillary is just a standard, run-of-the-mill, status quo supporting, Corporate Republocrat. Is that so hard to hear? Sanders is right. Not that he can solve the problem, but Clinton is just a Corporate Candidate.
Do you know why republicans and democrats look so close to you? It is because you view them from so far off.
It's because I view them without partisan bias and look at their actions. They act very similarly. Hillary will be no different than Bush and Obama. She's a Corporate Candidate. Bought and paid for, toeing the party line, maintaining the status quo. She's out for her own power and fame, nothing more.
They act very similarly, except for all the differences. Simply because they are not differences you care about does not make them the same.
What differences? How they all grow government? How the all grow spending? How they all expand our interventionist wars? How they all expand Big Brother policies? How they all pander to Corporate demands? What differences? What are "all the differences"? Words, that's what they are. They speak a different game. They don't DO a different game, they act the same. But they do talk a different game, that's true. So words are your differences. Superb.
Meanwhile, nothing changes because the Republocrats move in the same direction.
Thank you for basically proving my point. The problem is not that they are the same, only that you do not care about the differences.
I didn't prove your point. You couldn't list any real differences. What are the differences?
Tax policy
Abortion policy
Labor policy
Trade policy
Social policy
Educational policy
And so on and so forth.
Maybe you don't realize where this came from. It started with an interview Hillary did where they asked her if Bernie was qualified. She refused to answer that and then went on to say she doesn't think Bernie is even a democrat. Which is a convenient thing to push going into New York, a closed primary where only democrats can vote. If she's going to play the victim here alls I can say is she shouldn't be casting stones from that glass house of hers.
It's been an unfortunate sequence of events.
- Bernie again reveals himself to be a lightweight.
- Hillary when asked whether his performance is disqualifying gracefully demurs, instead pointing out the obvious ("...he hadn't done his homework and he'd been talking for more than a year about doing things that he obviously hadn't really studied or understood").
- Bernie goes ballistic, says more dumb things.
Apparently his goal in staying in until the convention isn't to push his issues, it's to escalate his mudslinging against Clinton. Fantastic.
Interesting. So not so much on the details, but just listing things.
Tax policy, how is Hillary different from the status quo there? We raising Capital Gains taxes? Raising taxes on the upper 1 %? What are we funding with these taxes.
Abortion, there's a good talking point. SCOTUS ruled on it, it's a dead issue for the most part, but it's a good talking point. How is Hillary different from the status quo there?
Labor policy. Been a hot topic lately. What's Hillary's take on this, how is it different from the status quo? It's a good talking point, but what is she going to do? More protections for public sector unions? Less? Or are we just running our mouths about it, but will in effect do nothing?
Trade policy, always a good one. Bill pushed the Corporate sponsored NAFTA through, did well for this rich buddies. What's Hillary's take on this? What is she going to do that's different from the status quo?
Social policy, this is also a good one. People really like to run their mouths here, but we don't see too much happen. Remember when the market when boom over, in part, those mortgages. Who was it that gave a ton of money in bailouts to the banks while doing nothing for the People? Obama, right? Oh, we also got Obamacare, right? A nice little handout to the Insurance Companies, guaranteed full consumership through govenrment force. Woot! So what’s Hillary going to do that’s different from the status quo here? Talk a game, or do something? We expanding programs? Decreasing programs? Adding programs? Deleting programs? Single payer healthcare maybe?
So where are we at then. Educational policy. This one is also been a hot topic. What’s Hillary going to do that’s different from the status quo? We going to change how we fund things? Are we going to change how student loans are going to be handled/issued? Are we going to do something about the ballooning costs of college? What’s the plan here?
And there’s more!!! Holy cow. If only I could get all this and more for the low low price of 3 payments of 29.99. But like your candidate, Redress, you’ve provided no substance. Words. Words are wind. What are the actual dynamics that will be changed, what are the actual plans, and how are they different from the status quo? You want to say they’re different, yeah? Well where is the difference?
There’s only one candidate talking about being different, only one who brings up these points you’ve listed, and that’s Bernie Sanders. He’s the only non-corporate candidate out there, and because of that the DNC will try their best to keep him from the nomination. The party doesn’t want someone who won’t toe the party line.
Do you not know how to google? Forbes Welcome
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?