- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 94,358
- Reaction score
- 82,749
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
3.18.22
Three weeks into Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine, Russian forces appear to be suffering from shortages, and commanders are struggling to sustain their troops in combat, a Pentagon official said Thursday. Russian advances largely remain stalled, making minimal progress in terms of ground movement as Ukrainian forces continue to put up determined resistance, a senior U.S. defense official told reporters in an update, speaking on the condition of anonymity. Putin's forces are "basically frozen around the country on multiple lines of axes, struggling to fuel themselves and to feed their troops and to supply them with arms and ammunition," the person said. The senior official with the U.S. Department of Defense said that Russia appears to now be relying more on so-called "dumb" bombs than on precision-guided munitions in its full-scale offensive against Ukraine—something that could indicate Russia could be suffering shortages and sustainment issues."We have seen them rely more, a little bit more than we saw in the early going, on dumb bombs. We think that it's possible that they might be either conserving their precision-guided munitions or beginning to experience shortages." "They clearly weren't ready for the pushback that they have been getting from the Ukrainians," the Pentagon official added.
Russia is also struggling to sustain troops in the field, the official noted, pointing to stalled efforts outside Kyiv, where a convoy of Russian forces stretching for miles has remained for days. "We talked back in week one about how they hadn't planned properly for logistics and sustainment, how they were struggling with fueling and even feeding their troops," the official said. "We've seen them try to overcome some of those ... issues, but they're still struggling to sustain their troops in the field." "They are still struggling with that," the official added. "Part of that we believe is because they didn't properly plan for—to execute good logistics. But also because they ran into a stiffer resistance from the Ukrainians than they expected." The official said it's "quite extraordinary" that three weeks in, Russian forces are still suffering the same logistical and sustainment issues, and that they are considering additional ways to overcome those shortages from outside Ukraine. The U.S. has also seen "anecdotal indications" that Russian troop morale is lagging due to "poor leadership, lack of information that the troops are getting about their mission and objectives" and disillusionment at "being resisted as fiercely as they have been."
There is always AMAZON!
View attachment 67380916
Do you think the Russian people know where Putin shops for clothes?
That what’s going on outside Kyiv is “stalled” is a pretty big assumption. Yesterday, the media reported that the Russians were building earthen embankments in those positions so it seems that they intend to stay there for awhile.
Propaganda or fact? Let's hope it's the latter. Throughout WW2 we were constantly told that Nazi aircraft production was in dire straits, yet Germany's aircraft production was increasing, right up until the end of the war; mostly the fighter types (Me109, Fw190, Me262), crucial for defence. Plenty of aircraft but woefully few experienced pilots, most of whom were long dead by '44/'45.
Common practise in times of war since time immemorial. Surround and besiege a city and bomb and starve it into submission.That what’s going on outside Kyiv is “stalled” is a pretty big assumption. Yesterday, the media reported that the Russians were building earthen embankments in those positions so it seems that they intend to stay there for awhile. I’d stay that rather than being “stalled” they’re just waging a war of attrition.
Common practise in times of war since time immemorial. Surround and besiege a city and bomb and starve it into submission.
No. Argentina invaded British territory; we threw them out. Took us 7-8 weeks.Did the British do that during the Falklands War?
Common practise in times of war since time immemorial. Surround and besiege a city and bomb and starve it into submission.
Indeed; although to be fair the Nazis had not anticipated the arrival of 'General Winter' which had a huge impact on troops and materiel ill-equipped against the ferocity of a Russian winter, along with supply lines stretched beyond capacity. Essentially the Nazis starved and froze themselves into defeat.In modern times less successful.
Think Leningrad and Stalingrad.
Russia Suffering Shortages, Struggling to Sustain Troops: Pentagon
I'm a bit surprised that Russian Defense Minister General Sergei Shoigu is not under house arrest. His forces have performed dismally.
The Russian Army is Running Out Of Trucks For its War In Ukraine
Soldiers being what they are, I have difficulty seeing Generals designing the kind of plan that just stalled. My suspicion is that at the Russian General Staff there is a lot of 'we shouldn't have done this, we shouldn't have done that....who designed this?" But also silence. The Chief designed it.
Maybe someone else “knows more than the generals?”A question that has been increasingly intriguing me is who exactly was responsible for at least the plan that stalled. It may not be the Generals at all. Or at least not the Russian General Staff. Keep in mind that all agree that the whole decision of whether Putin was bluffing or not appeared to be a secret known only to Putin. I am beginning to wonder if the plan was drawn by a small secret staff to Putin's specifications, and based on his own appreciation of Ukrainian resistance.
The stalled plan appears to me to have been based on it being a police action, meeting minimal resistance, and designed to avoid damages to infrastructure that would be needed after operation. That will make it in my estimation a Putin plan.
Soldiers being what they are, I have difficulty seeing Generals designing the kind of plan that just stalled. My suspicion is that at the Russian General Staff there is a lot of 'we shouldn't have done this, we shouldn't have done that....who designed this?" But also silence. The Chief designed it.
LOL...Maybe someone else “knows more than the generals?”
I have great difficulty believing "police officers" could have ordered and orchestrated a 40 mile long military convoy to invade Ukraine from Belarus with the intent to encircle Kyiv.
As he self-admitted, this is Putin's invasion. He is ultimately responsible as is everyone at the Kremlin who did not object.
Your attempt to deflect blame from Vladimir Putin and General Sergei Shoigu et. al. is noted.
My estimation is that if Shoigu had to draw up his own plans it would be closer to what other Generals on TV suggest should have been the plan
How could you know?
When has Shoigu ever planned any military undertaking this complex?
Is Shoigu not a career soldier?
A question that has been increasingly intriguing me is who exactly was responsible for at least the plan that stalled. It may not be the Generals at all. Or at least not the Russian General Staff. Keep in mind that all agree that the whole decision of whether Putin was bluffing or not appeared to be a secret known only to Putin. I am beginning to wonder if the plan was drawn by a small secret staff to Putin's specifications, and based on his own appreciation of Ukrainian resistance.
The stalled plan appears to me to have been based on it being a police action, meeting minimal resistance, and designed to avoid damages to infrastructure that would be needed after operation. That will make it in my estimation a Putin plan.
Soldiers being what they are, I have difficulty seeing Generals designing the kind of plan that just stalled. My suspicion is that at the Russian General Staff there is a lot of 'we shouldn't have done this, we shouldn't have done that....who designed this?" But also silence. The Chief designed it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?