• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

RFK Jr. says the CDC buried its own internal study which found a 1135% INCREASE in Autism risk from Hepatitis B Vaccine

The study that CDC suppressed about Hepatitis B? I don't see them releasing a manipulated study.

The one that they are doing now is comprehensive and will be finished in 6 months and the data will be made public.
Post #472


Why wouldn't trump's CDC release a study about Hep B that you claim in Post #472 was "suppressed" and "manipulated"?

The only reason that makes sense: there is no such study.
 
If the CDC supressed a study, it has to be somewhere. The scientists did work prior to writing the paper and publishing.
Listen, it's inconvenient for them to produce their sources now, even though they claim they exist now. Give them times to make a crooked study first, sheesh.
 
So...basically starve them. Because everything we eat is "toxic" in some form.
Wanna know how many mouse hairs & bug parts are in a jar of peanut butter?
I've never studied RFKJr. at all. But I can say, with absolutely clarity, that my answer to your question is No. That's a hard No.
 
Post #472


Why wouldn't trump's CDC release a study about Hep B that you claim in Post #472 was "suppressed" and "manipulated"?

The only reason that makes sense: there is no such study.
I bet you're a paid pharmaceutical shill. Or perhaps you're one of those CIA/FBI operatives that continually edits Wiki.
 
Big pharma is pissed and coming after RFK:




1000008593.webp
1000008594.webp
 
If it was manipulated, why would it claim that there is a 1135% increase in autism risk?
Post #474

Good catch.

(And it wasn't a "CDC study", but an unverified claim made by an anti-vax group, SafeMinds.)


"...There’s no record of Verstraeten publicly presenting a relative risk of 11.35. Instead, the number appears in a 2004 presentation from SafeMinds, an autism-focused anti-vaccine group that helped bring thimerosal concerns to prominence in the first place...."

(Tip of the hat to @multivita-man for providing the factcheck cite.)
 
Listen, it's inconvenient for them to produce their sources now, even though they claim they exist now. Give them times to make a crooked study first, sheesh.

They're not just claiming that the study exists. They're telling us what it said.

I would like to read whatever they have at the moment.
 
Post #474

Good catch.

(And it wasn't a "CDC study", but an unverified claim made by an anti-vax group, SafeMinds.)


"...There’s no record of Verstraeten publicly presenting a relative risk of 11.35. Instead, the number appears in a 2004 presentation from SafeMinds, an autism-focused anti-vaccine group that helped bring thimerosal concerns to prominence in the first place...."

(Tip of the hat to @multivita-man for providing the factcheck cite.)
Ahh, so it's something they themselves say, and then try to claim that the CDC said it in a nice little circle of purposefully created lies and disinformation. Got it.

The last children vaccine with thimerosal in it expired in 2003.
 
They're not just claiming that the study exists. They're telling us what it said.

I would like to read whatever they have at the moment.
And in 6 months they'll show you what this allegedly already existing study says.
 
Post #474

Good catch.

(And it wasn't a "CDC study", but an unverified claim made by an anti-vax group, SafeMinds.)


"...There’s no record of Verstraeten publicly presenting a relative risk of 11.35. Instead, the number appears in a 2004 presentation from SafeMinds, an autism-focused anti-vaccine group that helped bring thimerosal concerns to prominence in the first place...."

(Tip of the hat to @multivita-man for providing the factcheck cite.)
There's no record of the study that the CDC suppressed. Really? 🤣 🤣 🤣
 
We don't pre-medicate people for things that are unlikely to face. Babies aren't in danger of getting HepB, so their no need to vaccinate them for it. The majority of the populace isn't in danger of getting Hep B.

Also, the immune system doesn't develop until the child is around 3 or 4, and HepB is given right out of the womb.
There are thousands of people - including pregnant women - who have hep B and don’t even know it.

Many women receive little prenatal care.

We vaccinate because the risk of hep B contraction by an infant brings high risk of liver damage and failure.

Most every first world country on the planet gives hep B vaccination as a standard infant vaccine - either at birth or as an infant.

190 of the countries served by WHO provide infant hep B vaccination. 117 do it at birth.

Only 4 countries in WHO do not vaccinate infants for hep B.

This entire thing is BS

Vaccines are safe and effective.

This f*cking administration will cause people to die with their bullshit.

But hey - that’s what clowns voted for 🤷‍♀️
 
There's no record of the study that the CDC suppressed. Really? 🤣 🤣 🤣

Yet your own OP indicates a discussion of what's in it.

Am I the only one questioning how this sounds?
 
You guys call anything a conspiracy theory that you haven't been spoonfed by the corporate media.
No, just ridiculous tin foil hat level conspiracies.
 
All medications have a chance of having an adverse reaction. There's no need for this unnecessary risk.
There has been a 90% decrease in Hepatitis B infections since the introduction of the vaccine.

All this for very little risk.

Good trade off
 
How can people with critical thinking skills see this will the rabid vaxers are blind to it?



The TV news that was bought by The Big Pharma 30 years ago & are paid to lie to you about all things that profit Big Pharma & ultimately the TV news.

RFK has many flaws, but he’s been spot on about this issue for decades. People like Jon Stewart & Joe Scarborough used to thank him on camera for his courage in taking on Big Pharma over the vaccine issue.

Their silence has since been bought.

These are the same people who lied to you about Covid & told you the Covid Vaxx would stop transmission & contraction of the virus, they are the same people who’ve been lying to you about childhood vaccines & poisoning generations of children.

It’s time this stopped.

So Jimmy Dore reposting the same interview between a former heroin addict and a man who claims that he was physically injured by a demon in his sleep means what now?
 
There has been a 90% decrease in Hepatitis B infections since the introduction of the vaccine.

All this for very little risk.

Good trade off
But my meemaw once said that there was no Hep B in the good ol' days.
 
Oh for real? They are also going to publish the data publicly after they are done.
Yes, right after the winger newly formed task force on the JFK assassination releases their blockbuster report.
 
"RFK Jr. says" is a key indication the rest of the sentence is hogwash.

My favorite RFK Jr. pronouncement is that Canadian Froot Loops only has three ingredients. It has 26 ingredients.
RFKrazy talking to Tucker Carlson. I'm think I'm coming down with something.
LOL
JFKrazy talking with another conspiracy nut, Carlson.
It would be laughable if not for the fact the RFKrazy is in charge of HHS?
So the three of you have no comment on the subject just, "duh um..duh RFK duh is um bad"

Stunning commentary
 
So the three of you have no comment on the subject just, "duh um..duh RFK duh is um bad"

Stunning commentary
What subject? He hasn't posted the study yet.
 
Only “those” types of people got it.

No, not unless those people are more likely to share personal items, engage in IV drug use, or be treated using contaminated medical equipment.
 
Back
Top Bottom