Instead of just dismissing this absurd idea, I would like to utilize this thread as a chance to rebuke those "we need a revolution" types.
1) Causing a revolution is highly unlikely in the US. Not only does it have one of the best military in the world, it would take staggering amounts of money, weapons, manpower, logistics, communications, all the basic necessities of war to even hope for a chance at a revolution
2) The comparison to the US revolution is absurd. The 13 colonies were fighting in their home turf, against a country that is hundreds of kilometers away, a country that already had much of its military and resources committed to other places, and the US had the help of a powerful country. Given these circumstances and the technology of that age, it's a wonder the war dragged on for so long, instead of a quick US victory. Granted, the 13 colonies didn't have the fraction of resources, manpower, and weapons Great Britain had, yet considering the months that were needed to even supply their own troops, the US should have won handily.
3) The claims of a socialist, undemocratic government are absurd. Just take a trip to North Korea, Russia, Iran, or any of those oppressive countries, then talk. The US government will look almost like heaven. Not a reasonable cause to start a revolution against a good, democratic government that has a good history of running the US.
4) A revolution will most likely lead to economic, social, and political instability which will look like anarchy, nor is it granted that the successor government will be better than the current government. In fact, it will almost be impossible for various, uncountable reasons, and it is merely an idealistic dream that it will happen
There are many other reasons as why a revolution won't, will not, and should not happen, and I will happily elaborate if anybody has any questions, but these 4 are the main reasons why such a revolution is merely a dream