• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Report: George Zimmerman's wife says he threatened her[W:152]

AGENT J

"If you ain't first, you're last"
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
80,422
Reaction score
29,077
Location
Pittsburgh
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Report: George Zimmerman's wife says he threatened her

Back-up links:
Police: George Zimmerman's estranged wife calls saying he threatened her, her dad with gun. | Fox News
George Zimmerman taken into police custody after incident with wife - CNN.com

seems news on him just wont stop
for the record i NEVER thought he would be convicted of murder 2, ever
he always seemed like a douche and i would never want him on my neighborhood watch
 




I wonder what Zimmerman's explanation for this kerfuffle will be?

I won't be surprised if he says that he was just standing his ground against his wife and her parents and since he was outnumbered he thought that the best thing for him to do was point his gun at them.




Maybe one of the TV networks should start a new reality series on 'Stand Your Ground' Shootouts, With Zimmerman as the star, naturally.
 
Last edited:

He'll claim that his wife is a pot-smoking street thug who threatened his life with a pillow case.
 
:doh

Really?

Beaudreaux said:
The report has been clarified by the police. There was no gun involved.
Click to expand...
 
Excon said:
:doh
Obviously the part where you are wrong.
Click to expand...

thats what i thought you got nothing, thanks for playing, "i" am not wrong about anything posted
 
AGENT J said:
thats what i thought you got nothing, thanks for playing, "i" am not wrong about anything posted
Click to expand...
Figures!
:doh

What did you not understand about what was previously provided?

Beaudreaux said:
The report has been clarified by the police. There was no gun involved.
Click to expand...

If this is correct, what you provided wasn't.
It is that simple.
 
Excon said:
Figures!
:doh

What did you not understand about what was previously provided?

​

If this is correct, what you provided wasn't.
It is that simple.
Click to expand...

thank you for proving my point, i gave three links and "I" never said anything about a gun
thanks for playing,"I" wasnt wrong about anything, you lose as usual
its that simple
 
AGENT J said:
thank you for proving my point, i gave three links and "I" never said anything about a gun
thanks for playing,"I" wasnt wrong about anything, you lose as usual
its that simple
Click to expand...
Still as obstinate as ever.
What you provided is in question.
Period.
You don't get to hide behind because they said it. That is dishonesty. You provided it.

Thanks for playing, but you lose.
Beaudreaux said:
The report has been clarified by the police. There was no gun involved.
Click to expand...

Funny thing here is, that when I asked "really", and provided what Beaudreaux said, all you had to do was say that maybe the the other reports were wrong. But noooooooo, you apparently took it personally and seem to want to to fight about it for some inexplicable reason. :lamo
 
It's hysterical how you state he "can't hide behind because they said it" while at the same time, you hide behind Beaudreaux's [unsubstantiated] claim that no gun was involved because he said it. You quote him as though his claim is gospel rather than quote a news source.
 
:doh

:lamo :lamo
There you go again not paying attention to that which came before.

Do you not understand what the use of the word "if" means?


 
I am going to say the only thing that is REALLY important.

Thank God that couple did not procreate.
 
Excon said:
:doh

:lamo :lamo
There you go again not paying attention to that which came before.

Do you not understand what the use of the word "if" means?


​
Click to expand...

So? You were still hiding behind his posts because you didn't have a news source to rely on. Yet at the same time, you're accusing others of doing what you were doing. :roll:

Project much?
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
So? You were still hiding behind his posts because you didn't have a news source to rely on. Yet at the same time, you're accusing others of doing what you were doing. :roll:

Project much?
Click to expand...
You can attempt to spin all you want. It ain't gonna get you anywhere.
I showed that it may not be true by saying "if" even though I knew it was being reported.

You are the one who failed to read and realize that.
 
Excon said:
You can attempt to spin all you want. It ain't gonna get you anywhere.
I showed that it may not be true by saying "if" even though I knew it was being reported.

You are the one who failed to read and realize that.
Click to expand...

I'm not spinning anything. You were hiding behind Beaudreaux's claim because you didn't have a news source you could quote. So you pushed that quote lieu of the news source you were lacking.
 
Better question: Who will play Zimmerman in the movie?
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
I'm not spinning anything. You were hiding behind Beaudreaux's claim because you didn't have a news source you could quote. So you pushed that quote lieu of the news source you were lacking.
Click to expand...
Yeah you are spinning, or are seriously confused.
I didn't hide behind anything.
I asked him "really" and provided what Beaudreaux said. (already having looked up the information.)
Zimmerman's wife won't press charges despite call
Look at the time the first comment was made.
 That is me asking a question based on what another has said. That is not hiding. You saying so, is you spinning.

In addition, in response to his reply in the above exchange, I then stated "If this is correct, what you provided wasn't.", which you failed to read or understand.
 
Last edited:
SBu said:
Better question: Who will play Zimmerman in the movie?
Click to expand...
I vote for Emilio Estevez - when he was younger. :2razz:
 


translation: you are still factually wrong and have been proven to be wrong and that remains i didnt post anything wrong, not one thing
not personal your post made ZERO sense and was illogical
facts destroy your meaningless post again
 

ding ding ding
its beyond illogical that he thinks it has anything to do with me
i stated nothign about a gun anywhere, hell i dindt even say the story was factual and i believe it all lol
 
You can deny it all you want, you were hiding behind Beaudreaux's claim because you had no other source you could rely on.

Further, here you are again quoting Beaudreaux and not a news source (i.e., hiding behind Beaudreaux) ...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...an-after-911-call-wife-12.html#post1062295404

And again ...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...an-after-911-call-wife-10.html#post1062295323

And again ...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...fe-says-he-threatened-her.html#post1062295282

And again ...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...-says-he-threatened-her-2.html#post1062295572
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…