• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Religious Persons Need Not . . . . The New PC Bigotry

Has The Media gone to far regarding Religious Affiliations?

  • No

    Votes: 13 59.1%
  • Yes

    Votes: 9 40.9%

  • Total voters
    22
Weird. So you think unmarried women vote more emotionally?
I do not know if it’s emotional, but it’s certainly very left wing. And left-wing morality seems to be highly dependent upon a motion with no objective standard backing it.
 
You mean like how women are treated in Muslim countries? Funny how progressives luv Islam yet claim to stand for women's rights.

That's why I've never understood why you people hate conservative Islam so much. Y'all are waaayyyyy more similar than you want to admit.
 
Well I favor a different scheme which I just outlined.

I think land ownership or financial resources should determine suffrage.

I don’t think we’re in debt because of emotional women, it is indisputable fact.Voting patterns by sex are pretty well established. Single women vote overwhelmingly for the left, married women only lean left.

And that’s not to blame women solely for all the problems of society, because men have a higher IQ distribution than women, there is a lot of super intelligent men who are intellectuals who think of lots of bad theory that they justify it with clase intelligent Babel. This is where Communism socialism Nazism etc. came from. So my ideal political system would give the entire political control of the state to a landed class of rural citizens,
Have you ever considered that single women vote overwhelmingly for the left because they're worried about the right restricting their liberties?

You brought that upon yourself.
 
Have you ever considered that single women vote overwhelmingly for the left because they're worried about the right restricting their liberties?

You brought that upon yourself.
No, because the left overwhelmingly opposes the concept of civil liberties. In fact the liberties that liberal women seem to care about are not really liberties, they’re legal privileges based on selfish desire
 
An elective monarchy with the suffrage granted only to those owning taxable property in excess of 50,000 dollars or who place a cash bond at the value of the average home price with the state. The central state would be constitutionally limited at 80,000 employees outside of the military. Limited suffrage rights granted for military service like in Heinlien. Ban on redistribution schemes
Imagine my disappointment when I find that your grand plan for political reformation amounts to nothing more than extreme gerrymandering in favor of the wealthy. And you have the nerve to pretend that the common people would benefit from this?

Laughable.
 
No, because the left overwhelmingly opposes the concept of civil liberties. In fact the liberties that liberal women seem to care about are not really liberties, they’re legal privileges based on selfish desire
Privileges, liberties, the semantics make no difference. They're not going to love you for taking things away from them.
 
That's why I've never understood why you people hate conservative Islam so much. Y'all are waaayyyyy more similar than you want to admit.

No, you've got it exactly backwards.

Just like the political left, Islam is anti-America, anti-Christian, anti-capitalism, anti-free speech, and pro big government. As a nice bonus, Islam's hatred of the West dovetails nicely with the white guilt and self-loathing of the modern progressive.

You are correct that the political right in America despises Islam, while the left luvs it. If Islam were right wing then the opposite would be the case.
 
Imagine my disappointment when I find that your grand plan for political reformation amounts to nothing more than extreme gerrymandering in favor of the wealthy. And you have the nerve to pretend that the common people would benefit from this?

Laughable.
Most common people would pay far less in taxes and enjoy greater public order, and would have a society built on social bonds and intermediary institutions
 
tHE RIGHT WING HAS BECOME sooooooooooooooooooooooo PC, that you are not evewn able to question a candidate that is a heretic. A sorcerer, a witch. A speaker in tongues, for the purpose of exhibition. An abhorrent practice, right next to temple whore.
 
Yeah, that's messed up. Ann Coulter is the devil. Thankfully, she's not in any leadership position in government....not that she could get that done if she was anyway.
Can you rationally explain what was wrong with what she said?
 
It's each American's responsibility to present their views in a way that will get representatives elected and thus their policy enacted.

It's bizarre that I had to type that.
because it's not true? The only responsibility the American people have is to follow the law, nothing more.

but considering that the religious right HAS presented its views and elected representatives in their communities to congress, they are clearly fulfilling their responsibility by YOUR standards.
 
Can you rationally explain what was wrong with what she said?

That women shouldn't be allowed to vote? I mean............ can you rationally explain what was RIGHT with it?
 
because it's not true? The only responsibility the American people have is to follow the law, nothing more.

but considering that the religious right HAS presented its views and elected representatives in their communities to congress, they are clearly fulfilling their responsibility by YOUR standards.

And if their views are popular enough then the majority of the representatives will enact their policy.

It's kind of like how AOC doesn't get everything she wants. Nor do Christians (unless it's presented in a way that is palpable to the American public).

Now, the big problem, that Christians never speak of, is that fake christians have taken over Christianity politicly and tons of Americans can see through the con. That's why no one with a brain ever believed Jerry Fallwell Jr.
 
Most common people would pay far less in taxes and enjoy greater public order, and would have a society built on social bonds and intermediary institutions
I find it very unlikely that taking away the vote from the common people would improve public order. The instant you tried to do so, there'd be huge resistance, protests, even violence. You want a society based on social bonds? That requires trust. You're not going to get trust if your first political act is a massive betrayal.
 
I find it very unlikely that taking away the vote from the common people would improve public order. The instant you tried to do so, there'd be huge resistance, protests, even violence. You want a society based on social bonds? That requires trust. You're not going to get trust if your first political act is a massive betrayal.
Oh you’re right, nothing like what I suggest will arrive from the ballot box. However we are a society that so denies reality to the point that eventually there’s going to be a massive societal collapse, So after there’s a large day off of the urban population from a Civil War social collapsSo after there’s a large day off of the urban population from a Civil War or Social collapse, my ideas for when we rebuild society to avoid the mistakes of the past one
 
Well I favor a different scheme which I just outlined. I think land ownership or financial resources should determine suffrage. I don’t think we’re in debt because of emotional women, it is indisputable fact.Voting patterns by sex are pretty well established. Single women vote overwhelmingly for the left, married women only lean left. And that’s not to blame women solely for all the problems of society, because men have a higher IQ distribution than women, there is a lot of super intelligent men who are intellectuals who think of lots of bad theory that they justify it with clase intelligent Babel. This is where Communism socialism Nazism etc. came from. So my ideal political system would give the entire political control of the state to a landed class of rural citizens,

Oh, you are so in danger of the "Lysistrata" solution.
 
And if their views are popular enough then the majority of the representatives will enact their policy.

It's kind of like how AOC doesn't get everything she wants. Nor do Christians (unless it's presented in a way that is palpable to the American public).
Yes.

And the problem is? Christians are lesser than other americans because....?

Now, the big problem, that Christians never speak of, is that fake christians have taken over Christianity politicly and tons of Americans can see through the con. That's why no one with a brain ever believed Jerry Fallwell Jr.
Isn't that kinda up to the christian community to decide? If you're not a christian, then who the hell are you to decide who is a fake christian are not?
 
And I thought that Amy Coney Barrett was Catholic?
 
Yes.

And the problem is? Christians are lesser than other americans because....?
of course not.

well, unless they're fake Christians using religion to push political agendas, segregate, etc.
 
That women shouldn't be allowed to vote? I mean............ can you rationally explain what was RIGHT with it?
You were the one who made the claim (that Ann Coulter is evil). You defend it.
 
That women shouldn't be allowed to vote? I mean............ can you rationally explain what was RIGHT with it?
The thing is.. Amy Barrett belongs to a denomination that believes women should be totally subservient to their husband, and they used to call women in the church 'handmaids to the lord'. I can see how someone with that mentality can really take away women's rights. She would be in a very powerful position to do so.
 
Tempest in a tea pot. Got nothing on Barrett it looks like....if this is the best you can come up with.
 
The New, PC Approved, Bigotry.
Religious persons.

No Longer about Jews, Buddhist, but now inclusive of
TOO CHRISTIAN. Regardless of branch.
Too Catholic. Too Mormon. Too . Too. Too. and so we witness.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/high-court-nominee-served-handmaid-180254678.html

High court nominee served as 'handmaid' in religious group


WASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett served as a “handmaid,” the term then used for high-ranking female leaders in the People of Praise religious community, an old directory for the group's members shows.

Barrett has thus far refused to discuss her membership in the Christian organization, which opposes abortion and, according to former members, holds that men are divinely ordained as the “head” of both the family and faith, while it is the duty of wives to submit to them. . . . . .



Hasn't religious affiliation gone too far?
One's religious affiliations use to be private in :usflag:
What happened?


I remember there was concern the first
Roman Catholic President would leak secrets to The Vatican


Has the media gone too far?


Moi






She isn't a real Catholic...real Catholics aren't members of weird Charismatic groups that resemble Pentecostal Holiness groups
 
Tempest in a tea pot. Got nothing on Barrett it looks like....if this is the best you can come up with.
Ms Barrett is a type: bright, ambitious, obedient, hard working, pleasant, intelligent but limited in intellect to what her groomers allow her to experience. Unfortunately her life experience consists almost entirely of a narrow, controlled and limiting religion. She will not understand people outside of her own limiting experience. They will not be people with different lives, but similar rights to be protected by the Constitution. She will see them as wrong or base. She is not a Scalia. He was not a limited person.
 
She isn't a real Catholic...real Catholics aren't members of weird Charismatic groups that resemble Pentecostal Holiness groups

How about Jesuits who maintain
their own Pope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_General_of_the_Society_of_Jesus

I don't consider Jesuits, Real Catholics.

So What!



Please see upload #1.
The issues should only be about ones actions and writings.
Not any religious affiliation.

BTW questions of having a decision before a case is filed
and arguments heard is another absurdity I have witnessed
at Senate questioning of nominated Justices.
ie. Roe v Wade


Moi
 
Back
Top Bottom