• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Religious Persons Need Not . . . . The New PC Bigotry

Has The Media gone to far regarding Religious Affiliations?

  • No

    Votes: 13 59.1%

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 40.9%
  • Total voters
    22
ludin said:
your strawman is running away.

what i am saying is litmus tests are unconstitutional.

don't like it too bad. quit being a religious bigot.
that or prove that it has any affect on her judgeship.

you can't. she has excellent ratings from pretty much every group out there.
Click to expand...
When it comes to political electoral offices yes. But the Supreme Court is neither (or least suppose to be neither) so the applicability of the Constitution's no religious test clause is not at all clear when it comes to Supreme Court judges. Especially given the founding fathers position on the separation of church and state in regard to the law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom