• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Religion Simplified

Nope. Somebody may have switched the body / dna samples. Or, the chain of custody of those samples was not secure.

You have Nothing. How do you like it?
 
Logicman said:
Nope. Somebody may have switched the body / dna samples. Or, the chain of custody of those samples was not secure.

You have Nothing. How do you like it?
Click to expand...
Prove it.
 
Logicman said:
You prove it was all legit and conducted properly. That's your so-called evidence you're required to defend.
Click to expand...
Lol. I love how you shift goal posts, and then keep on demanding evidence trying to raise the bar set against you, while avoiding showing even the basics for your own claims. It shows the arguments you are attempting to promote are null and void.
 
soylentgreen said:
If the bible could be reduced to four words they would be, " Because I said so"
Click to expand...
Wrong...it would be "Because I know what is best for my creation"...
 
RAMOSS said:
Lol. I love how you shift goal posts, and then keep on demanding evidence trying to raise the bar...
Click to expand...
Those are your tricks, and have been for years. I was just giving you a demonstration of what you skeptics put out on a daily basis.
 
Logicman said:
Those are your tricks, and have been for years. I was just giving you a demonstration of what you skeptics put out on a daily basis.
Click to expand...

Nah , that isn't that case. The fact of the matter is that you can't support your own claims, so when another claim is actually supported, you attempt to move goal posts.

Or, you try to make someone support a claim they did not make.

That shows a weak original claim on your part.
 
The supernatural claims of organized religion are germaine but not functionally relevant to the function of religion, which is to bind people to a specific authority while discouraging them from forming alternative bonds or loyalties. In other words, the various meta-narratives (Hercules/Melqart performed heroic tasks, Dionysus liberates unto death, Jesus died for your sins, Muhammad heard the final revelation, Joseph Smith was given a new revelation,etc) can and do vary wildly, but their function is the same: to capture and hold fidelity by way of active, ongoing mythopoesis.

It's not important if Jesus could perform miracles, was born or adopted as a god, or even existed. What's important is that believers stay believing, because their loyalty provides material benefit and power to the arbiters of those metanarratives.

Unbelievers fall into a stupid trap, debating the validity of supernatural stories. They aren't accounts of fact. They are epistemic filters, shaping real events into the ongoing myth stories, and binding their users to the power that controls them.
 
Rich2018 said:
Where/when in the Bible ?
(not that the contents of the Bible is evidence)

Where/when since the days of the Bible ?
Click to expand...
Hebrews 11 mentions a few...Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Sarah, Joseph, Moses, Rahab, Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, as well as Samuel and the other prophets....verses 33-35 tells us...

"Through faith they defeated kingdoms, brought about righteousness, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the force of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, from a weak state were made powerful, became mighty in war, routed invading armies. Women received their dead by resurrection..."

And all the ones who have lived and are living with Jehovah's guidance today, me being one of them...
 

Former local, nationwide Jehovah’s Witnesses find child sex abuse ‘swept under the rug’

When Pennsylvania native Kahley Groff, a former Jehovah’s Witness, came forward about the sexual abuse she endured as a child at Yorkanna Kingdom Hall, she had “hoped” elders and other
www.collegian.psu.edu
 

So because the Bible gives the names of multiple paradigms of virtue, we are just to accept the stories about them ?
Sorry, the Bible is proof of nothing - you missed out Mohammed Btw, or do you not consider him a prophet ?

And no, no kingdom was ever defeated by "faith"

And where are you post Biblical times proofs ?
 
Provide for us proof YOU exist
 
Why ? I made absolutely ZERO claims about that individual. So I do not incur any burden of proof. Your desperation and intellectual dishonesty is really showing and I'm clearly not the only one here who sees it.
 
Gordy327 said:
Why ? I made absolutely ZERO claims about that individual. So I do not incur any burden of proof. Your desperation and intellectual dishonesty is really showing and I'm clearly not the only one here who sees it.
Click to expand...
Well, let's review what you did that you're now denying. From Post # 336 (link below):

Look folks - Gordy wants EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE for Jesus and/or the Gospel accounts.

1. He can't define the scientific criteria used in gaining empirical evidence on a 2,000 year old individual.

2. When challenged, Gordy could not cite a single individual from antiquity that ANYONE (scientist or history scholar, etc.) has ever obtained empirical evidence on.

3. Gordy cannot provide empirical evidence himself for anyone from antiquity.

4. Gordy is demanding something from Christians that even secularists cannot come up with.

5. Gordy doesn't require that same empirical evidence from other individuals in ancient history (i.e. 1. Hippocrates 2. Attila the Hun 3. Archimedes of Syracuse 4. Confucius 5. Hannibal etc.) in his history books. Thus, Gordy needs to burn his college history books and demand history professors, etc., do the same.

6. Gordy has a double standard.

7. Gordy thus has zero credibility demanding empirical evidence for anyone from antiquity. It's an absolute farce.

Post #336 in Debate Politics - https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...-historical-event-ever.478343/post-1075788294
 
Somerville said:
Does this silly meme remind you of anyone?

View attachment 67393688
Click to expand...

It does, but these memes often miss the real point.

The arguments that we tend to have around here are some terrible hybrid of oversimplified ontological arguments mixed with what you point out in suggesting the inverse of proving something. Well, prove it doesn't becomes a natural defense.

It is also the disagreement that will never be solved in that context, the meme also points out that systems of science are incompatible with systems of belief. The basis for how one gets to a conclusion from an idea is adversarial. You cannot cherry-pick from one or the other ideology to blend some argument despite how hard some try to do so, the inherent failure is the conclusions in that meme.

And they should be adversarial. Science tends to be based on question, doubt, observation, evaluation, repetition, refinement all over a very long timeframe. Trying to obtain new understandings does not have a limit, and does not stop. Religion tends to be the exact opposite, certainty from belief that is beyond question.

That collision is the basis for every single argument we have in this area of the forums.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…