- Joined
- Sep 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,071
- Reaction score
- 163
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
A question for the liberals...
Why is redistribution of wealth from rich people to poor people ok but redistribution of jobs from rich countries to poor countries not ok?
A question for the libertarians...
Does redistribution of wealth bribe the poor not to revolt?
A question for the liberals...
Why is redistribution of wealth from rich people to poor people ok but redistribution of jobs from rich countries to poor countries not ok?
A question for the libertarians...
Does redistribution of wealth bribe the poor not to revolt?
A question for the liberals...
Why is redistribution of wealth from rich people to poor people ok but redistribution of jobs from rich countries to poor countries not ok?
A question for the libertarians...
Does redistribution of wealth bribe the poor not to revolt?
A question for the liberals...
Why is redistribution of wealth from rich people to poor people ok but redistribution of jobs from rich countries to poor countries not ok?
people get confused. if someone earns more and more money that is not redistribution, For example when a top poker player wins a big pot that is not redistribution. when Rafa Nadal wins more prize money than the guys ranked 12-600 combined that is not redistribution of money. Redistribution is when the government takes money from someone who earned it, inherited it or won it and gives it to people who did nothing to earn, win or inherit the money
Oh, so all that money the government shovels into the hands of private businesses through a corrupt contracting process is money they earned.
Got it.
you think that most money corporations get comes from that? and that such moneys don't go to say union members, workers etc?
I understand why you are so confused. "corrupt contracting system". Any proof that is widespread? try again, you FAIL on this count
I looked through my post to find the word "most." Couldn't find it. Can you give me a hand?
ah OK you think all corporations engage in that
my bad
No, couldn't find the phrase "all corporations" either...
so how many were you talking about
What level of redistribution of wealth to corporations is acceptable for you?
How about letting us all know when that starts happening... for the last 30 years its been going in the opposite direction.Why is redistribution of wealth from rich people to poor people ok...
A question for the libertarians...
Does redistribution of wealth bribe the poor not to revolt?
A question for the liberals...
Why is redistribution of wealth from rich people to poor people ok but redistribution of jobs from rich countries to poor countries not ok?
How about letting us all know when that starts happening... for the last 30 years its been going in the opposite direction.
Why don't we just keep it simple. You keep most of what you earn and I'll keep most of what I earn. The rest goes to a limited government that keeps us safe and takes care of those who really can't take of themselves because they have no one else to care for them.
The purpose of redistributation is to allow the game to continue.
Someone used a poker tournament as an example. Typically in poker there is one player who is better than all the rest. Ultimately he wins all the money and eventually the fun ends because there is no more money to bet.
The same with our economy, some people attract money, ultimately, without some form of redistributation, they would aquire all of the wealth, and our economy, as we know it today, would end.
What would happen if evaporation stopped? Ultimately, rain would stop, our rivers would stop flowing, and all of the water on earth would be held by our greatest lakes and oceans. Most of our land masses would become barren desserts unable to support life.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?