- Joined
- Aug 1, 2014
- Messages
- 26,719
- Reaction score
- 6,278
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
One email, dated May 13, 2017, and obtained by Fox News, includes a discussion of “remuneration packages” for six people in a business deal with a Chinese energy firm. The email appeared to identify Hunter Biden as “Chair/ Vice Chair depending on an agreement with CEFC,” in an apparent reference to now-bankrupt CEFC China Energy Co.
The email includes a note that “Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.” A proposed equity split references “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?” with no further details.
Fox News spoke to one of the people who was copied on the email, who confirmed its authenticity. Sources also told Fox News that “the big guy” was a reference to the former vice president.
While Biden has not commented on that email or his alleged involvement in any deals with the Chinese Energy firm, his campaign said it released the former vice president's tax returmns and returns, which show no involvement with Chinese investments.
Biden mum on Hunter Biden emails, alleged knowledge of son's overseas business dealings
Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has remained mum on questions about his knowledge of his son Hunter’s overseas business dealings, which were discussed in a series of emails purportedly found on a laptop belonging to his son.www.foxnews.com
You can no longer claim the emails aren't real Dems. Onto strategy #2--admit they're real, but say Russian intel obtained them.
Oh oh Dems. Your strongest argument against the veracity of the Biden email dump is falling apart.
Wait, wasn't it last week or so that conservatives said unnamed sources are garbage and everything they say can be ignored? You guys are dizzying with your twists and turns. Next you'll say a Supreme Court justice CAN be confirmed before the election.You can no longer claim the emails aren't real Dems. Onto strategy #2--admit they're real, but say Russian intel obtained them.
Oh oh Dems. Your strongest argument against the veracity of the Biden email dump is falling apart.
/// Kamal Toe /// <---- More disgusting misogyny/demeaning of females that offers nothing positive to the DP goal of productive discourse.......Joe and Kamal Toe will pretend it doesn't matter
Wait, wasn't it last week or so that conservatives said unnamed sources are garbage and everything they say can be ignored? You guys are dizzying with your twists and turns. Next you'll say a Supreme Court justice CAN be confirmed before the election.
if the senate and the president agree, yes she will be confirmed.
You can no longer claim the emails aren't real Dems. Onto strategy #2--admit they're real, but say Russian intel obtained them.
Oh oh Dems. Your strongest argument against the veracity of the Biden email dump is falling apart.
You realize you're talking about Hunter Biden who isn't running for office?
Of course not. See: everything Rs said about why they wouldn't vote on Garland. They can't possibly be so hypocritical as to do a 180 on that now, can they?
No problem with any of that. Aside: please participate in the thread I'm about to start, as I would be fascinated to hear your input. (Also, I am always right and you are always wrong.)Now we both can agree that we don't know if Garland had a vote, what would happen. But friends of mine who practice in that circuit note that Garland is very hostile to gun rights. He was opposed to the Heller decision and was one of the 4 (out of ten) who wanted an en banc hearing of the 2-1 decision that struck down the DC ban. I am also aware that some of the pro gun senators planned on grilling him on Heller and I suspect he would not have been affirmed. BTW I believe he should have had a hearing-just as appellate court nominees Estrada and Keisler (a close friend since freshman year in college) should have had-they both were denied hearings by the dems, even though they had the votes to be seated.
probably tomorrow strike that-later today-its past 1 AM here in flyover country.No problem with any of that. Aside: please participate in the thread I'm about to start, as I would be fascinated to hear your input. (Also, I am always right and you are always wrong.)
You can no longer claim the emails aren't real Dems. Onto strategy #2--admit they're real, but say Russian intel obtained them.
Oh oh Dems. Your strongest argument against the veracity of the Biden email dump is falling apart.
Oh well in that case I'm convinced.You realize this is about Joe Biden, who is running for office?
Email: ”A proposed equity split references “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?”Sources also told Fox News that “the big guy” was a reference to the former vice president.
You can no longer claim the emails aren't real Dems. Onto strategy #2--admit they're real, but say Russian intel obtained them.
Oh oh Dems. Your strongest argument against the veracity of the Biden email dump is falling apart.
This pic wraps the entire stack of bullshit up nicely.
It's the exact same game plan they used in 2016.EMAILS! That's it, that'll be the way y'all take back the narrative!
/// Kamal Toe /// <---- More disgusting misogyny/demeaning of females that offers nothing positive to the DP goal of productive discourse.......
if the senate and the president agree, yes she will be confirmed. and I think that is more important than whether Trump wins or not. If he loses, the GOP will win big majorities in both houses in 2022
Mitch is willing to lose the senate over this nomination, I agree with you there. However I disagree with you wholeheartedly about 2022. Trump will be facing legal troubles when he gets the boot next month which will drag on and on and remind people why they shouldn't trust the R's. Plus if the dems control everything and start passing things most people actually like, it's all over for the R's for quite a long time.if the senate and the president agree, yes she will be confirmed. and I think that is more important than whether Trump wins or not. If he loses, the GOP will win big majorities in both houses in 2022
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?