Recipient of Hunter Biden Email Confirms Authenticity

[Yakshi]

What's the crime again?

Tyranny?

Treason?

Murder?

Writing emails?

 

[OscarLevant]

It's Hiden Biden that is a threat. China has him under their thumb.

Incompetent rebuttal; vacuous allegation.

 

[OscarLevant]

You can no longer claim the emails aren't real Dems. Onto strategy #2--admit they're real, but say Russian intel obtained them.



Oh oh Dems. Your strongest argument against the veracity of the Biden email dump is falling apart.

Yeah, the story that Biden is corrupt is falling apart.

 

[OscarLevant]

You realize this is about Joe Biden, who is running for office?

Email: ”A proposed equity split references “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?”​

​

Sources also told Fox News that “the big guy” was a reference to the former vice president.​

That isn't evidence of Biden corruption.

Educate yourself on what is evidence.

 

[OscarLevant]

Even if this email was verified, it was from 2017. After Biden was no longer in office.

The email doesn't prove anything. Anyone can say anything, it's just speculation. It's not evidence.

 

[OscarLevant]

It's been reported that Bevan Cooney, a guy in prison who was in Hunter's inner circle, gave access to his account full of emails to Peter Schweizer.
Bevan was pissed that he was the only one of the 3 in Hunter's gang who took the rap.
It was only one of 3 separate passels of emails related to Hunter but I believe it was the one that included ...
"Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate." A proposed equity split references "20" for "H" and "10 held by H for the big guy?" ... the big guy being Joe Biden and related to China.

Get back to me when you got a xerox copy of a bribery check, surveillance tape of cash changing hands, taped phone calls with Joe, etc.

That email is just someone trying to Bribe Hunter and his dad ( but even that's not clear). Unless hunter or joe take the bribe, if, indeed, it is a bribe, it's not a crime.

There is no way in hell Barr is going to announce there is an investigation.

There might be one, but he knows, especially given what happened in 2016, that he, ( Barr ) and the FBI cannot do it.

 

[Paradoxical]

Incompetent rebuttal; vacuous allegation.

Everybody is a liar but Joe, eh? Emails lie, too.

 

[Conservative]

Rebuttal is incompetent; non-argument

Incompetent rebuttals are arguments where the salient premise is based on: [highlighted pertains to your comment]
non arguments, a non argument isn't really debatable or it's not worthy of debate owing to any of the following types, they come in many different flavors, especially those which contain vacuous declarations and/or allegations (which cannot be substantiated, i.e., 'making stuff up' or repeating some manufactured group-think narrative that is essentially drivel), rebuttals rife with weasel words ( improper use of generalities such as 'some people are saying' 'everyone knows' 'well-established fact'.) ad hominems, loaded terms & phrases,, off topic/irrelevant deflections, sentiments (words that reveal emotional attitude devoid of fact, logic and reason) off point arguments/deflections (off point is a sibling to off topic, where off topic is attempting to highjack the thread. It's done a lot in internet forums, and if the person to whom you directed the topic change accepts it, then you're off into a new direction, but, as such, of course, doesn't refute the original premise offered), egregious strawman arguments, off-the-charts ill-logic, 'kill the messenger" tactics, i.e., attacking the person presenting the argument rather than the argument, itself ( the only time kill the messenger is valid is for a well-established discredited source, such as Alex Jones, David Duke, etc, ), childish remarks, trivialising your opponent's argument -- cheap shot, childish or sophomoric comments arising from ignorance (for example, NYTimes is a 'radical leftist rag' -- that's a remark born out of ignorance, it's also an 'kill the messenger' tactic) and then there is the classic
thought-terminating cliché; these are cult-tropes, born out of groups who have a demagogue leader who is the master of implanting them in his flock. See, the demagogue doesn't like dissent, so when anyone challenges someone in his flock, he, being a master mind manipulator, will have planted a number of thought-terminating clichés into the minds of his subjects ( via repetition) so they will toss it up to the opponent in an attempt to kill the conversation ( wrongfully thinking it improves their argument ) so TTCs are simple terms catch phrases or words whose sole purpose is, to kill the conversation, such as 'TDS' "NeverTrumper" "Leftist Loony" "Liberal elite" (noting that the terms are not necessarily devised by the demagogue himself, they could be created by other believers, or have already been around and adopted by and they catch on with the group ) etc. last, but not least, and a significant debate sin, is posturing; posturing type comments, come in two basic categories, one is where you flaunt, i.e, for example, your military service, but of course if the argument can be improved by your qualifications of expertise in a field, that is okay, what I mean is something like 'I served while you were dodging the draft" whereupon your service doesn't improve your argument about whether dodging the draft was moral, or not, or flaunting your education, or authority of some kind, unless it's pertinent to the argument, and the other type of posturing are those comments which are motivated by puffing oneself up, and this is done by shaming, belittling, mocking, patronizing, 'mansplaining', flaming, where one talks down to ones opponent in order to puff oneself up.

What isn't debatable are the results Biden has generated over 47 years as a public servant and what today's Democratic Party has become, a group of radicalized liberals who promote chaos, politics of personal destruction, massive dependence, and failed promises. What motivates people like you to vote for this party?? How about the words of your leadership ignoring the results of that leadership

 

[bubbabgone]

Get back to me when you got a xerox copy of a bribery check, surveillance tape of cash changing hands, taped phone calls with Joe, etc.

That email is just someone trying to Bribe Hunter and his dad ( but even that's not clear). Unless hunter or joe take the bribe, if, indeed, it is a bribe, it's not a crime.

There is no way in hell Barr is going to announce there is an investigation.

There might be one, but he knows, especially given what happened in 2016, that he, ( Barr ) and the FBI cannot do it.

As I noted many times right here on DP, abuse of power isn't always a crime.

What exactly is it that you don't believe?
The stuff on Hunter's laptop? ... or that it's even Hunter's laptop?
That Joe's family cashed in on Joe's name and position? ... with his knowledge and help?
Or do you believe it but don't think it's at all shoddy?
Or maybe that it's just not illegal?

What?

 

[AlphaOmega]

I think the only people who give two shits about Hunter Biden are already voting for Trump.

It's much akin to the old saying, "Preaching to the choir."

Only a piece of shit would vote for a guy who litetally sold out America to China for his personal gain. You are voting for Biden?

 

[Paradoxical]

What isn't debatable are the results Biden has generated over 47 years as a public servant and what today's Democratic Party has become, a group of radicalized liberals who promote chaos, politics of personal destruction, massive dependence, and failed promises. What motivates people like you to vote for this party?? How about the words of your leadership ignoring the results of that leadership

What a GREAT commercial

 

[Conservative]

What a GREAT commercial

Notice how the Biden supporters mostly radical ignore this video?

 

[Paradoxical]

Notice how the Biden supporters mostly radical ignore this video?

Yep. They only see and hear what they are told to by Twitter and CNN and they love being controlled like that.

 

[Conservative]

Yep. They only see and hear what they are told to by Twitter and CNN and they love being controlled like that.

CNN had its worst ratings in history this past month and that speaks volumes about people these radicals want to ignore

 

[Paradoxical]

CNN had its worst ratings in history this past month and that speaks volumes about people these radicals want to ignore

That's amazing! In a time where there was news galore and CNN is sinking like the Titanic. Time to get rid of some of those idiots there like Cooper, Lemon and Cuomo.