• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reagan’s Atrocities

Thanks for perfectly providing my point that getting beaten and humiliated traumatized the military so badly that rather than learn from its mistakes it just decided to shriek “we win! We win!” over and over. No wonder the US keeps losing wars.

Irrelevant to the fact the US was beaten and humiliated.
 
More childish pouting because you can’t bear to face the fact that the US was beaten and humiliated.
 
Nope, the US failed on every level in Vietnam….just like in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Trying to blame the regime we created and spent twenty years arming for our failure is comical.
 
Tigerace117 said:
I’ve backed away from nothing. You have been shrieking that I have because you lack attention to detail and basic reading comprehension, but that says a lot more about you than it does about me.

Reagan absolutely was an international war criminal, as shown by the fact he was directly responsible for numerous violations of international law and complicit in genocide, as I have documented.

Nah, what sounds like babble is your poutrage over having to face the fact your hero was a scumbag who belonged in The Hague.
Click to expand...

Nobody is "shrieking". You've given no facts that anyone would have difficulty facing. You've given few facts at all, let alone a coherent argument originating from them.

We're back to your claim that RR was an international war criminal. You've not supported that. All you've shown- with my assistance- is that he wasn't even subject to any supposed construction of international law. You don't seem to understand that if law isn't enforced by recognized authority with the power to do so; then law is just some people going on about their personal wishes. When I make a law stating that nobody may drive past my house faster than 20 mph, is it a real law?

Do you have any pictures of those VC tanks?
 
Tigerace117 said:
<Snipped meaningless nonsense>
Click to expand...

You have avoided discussing the NVA in regards to the fall of Saigon.

You have avoided discussing the Paris Peace Accords and the restrictions therein.

You steadfastly continue to claim the VC were resurrected when in fact they took on a less militaristic role and more political role.

You steadfastly continue to claim the VC were not beaten in 1969 even through their own historians stated it was so.

You conflate Cambodia and South Vietnam.

You can't admit the MILITARY operation in 2003 was a bright and shining use of combined arms to defeat Saddam Hussein and his Army.

Etc.

Etc.

Etc.

Etc.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Nah, what’s really funny is watching you cower away from the fact your hero was complicit in genocide because you got a vacation.
Click to expand...

Bad attempt at deflection, "Tigerace". Heh.

Go ahead. Say it. The North Vietnamese troops marched into Saigon.
 
We shoulda let the Soviets have Central and South America, right? They always treated populations well.
 
Fledermaus said:
You have avoided discussing the NVA in regards to the fall of Saigon.

You have avoided discussing the Paris Peace Accords and the restrictions therein.

You steadfastly continue to claim the VC were resurrected when in fact they took on a less militaristic role and more political role.

You steadfastly continue to claim the VC were not beaten in 1969 even through their own historians stated it was so.

You conflate Cambodia and South Vietnam.

You can't admit the MILITARY operation in 2003 was a bright and shining use of combined arms to defeat Saddam Hussein and his Army.

Etc.

Etc.

Etc.

Etc.
Click to expand...

Hell...he was the first to say that the VC were destroyed after TET. Then- realizing how destructive that was to his narrative- he invented this story where they rose from the ashes and defeated the United States military.
 
Now that I think of it...not only rose from the ashes, but rose from the ashes with endless troops and material. The VC were the first army in the history of the world to have that luxury, apparently.

Oh the hyperbole...
 
RF667799 said:
Nobody is "shrieking". You've given no facts that anyone would have difficulty facing. You've given few facts at all, let alone a coherent argument originating from them.

We're back to your claim that RR was an international war criminal. You've not supported that. All you've shown- with my assistance- is that he wasn't even subject to any supposed construction of international law. You don't seem to understand that if law isn't enforced by recognized authority with the power to do so; then law is just some people going on about their personal wishes. When I make a law stating that nobody may drive past my house faster than 20 mph, is it a real law?

Do you have any pictures of those VC tanks?
Click to expand...

Lol yes, you certainly are. I provided extensively details of the genocide Reagan was complicit in, along with a boatload of other atrocities, in the OP and first few posts. As usual, you appear to have glossed right over it. Missing the details again.

Nope, all you’ve done is shriek that the US is above international law, which isn’t the case, no matter how much you wish it was.

Thanks for providing my point perfectly.
 
ecofarm said:
We shoulda let the Soviets have Central and South America, right? They always treated populations well.
Click to expand...

Gee bud, not supporting a genocide is “letting the Soviets have Central and South America”? What a chock of shit you just spewed.

You know what actually created support for communism in Latin America? The jackboot of the American backed tyrants who brutalized their people for decades.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Lol yes, you certainly are. I provided extensively details of the genocide Reagan was complicit in, along with a boatload of other atrocities, in the OP and first few posts. As usual, you appear to have glossed right over it. Missing the details again.

Nope, all you’ve done is shriek that the US is above international law, which isn’t the case, no matter how much you wish it was.

Thanks for providing my point perfectly.
Click to expand...

RR must have certainly been above "international law". Because it's certainly a fact that he was never arrested, charged, and tried for these crimes you claim he is guilty of.

Any pictures of those VC tanks yet?
 
America: beaten and humiliated in Vietnam.

Just as in Afghanistan.

Just as in Iraq.

The US invasion directly lead to Islamic extremists taking over a massive swath of the Middle East.

South Vietnam.

Duh.

Clue: history.
 
RF667799 said:
RR must have certainly been above "international law". Because it's certainly a fact that he was never arrested, charged, and tried for these crimes you claim he is guilty of.

Any pictures of those VC tanks yet?
Click to expand...

Otto Skorzeny wasn’t arrested either. Does that mean the atrocities he committed were no big deal?
 
Tigerace117 said:
The Vietnamese beat and humiliated the US, yes.

Heh.
Click to expand...

Why are you having such trouble saying "North Vietnamese"? Aren't those your heroes who made up the NVA that marched into Saigon? Hey...they had tanks, Tigerace!
 
More terrified shrieks of horror because you can’t bear to face the fact the US was beaten and humiliated in Vietnam.

More wailing of “look how much stuff with blew up” because you can’t bear to face the fact the invasion was a disastrous failure which directly lead to ISIS’ rise.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Otto Skorzeny wasn’t arrested either. Does that mean the atrocities he committed were no big deal?
Click to expand...

Try to focus. Oh right...if you do that, you just go over ground where you've been badly beaten.
 
RF667799 said:
Why are you having such trouble saying "North Vietnamese"? Aren't those your heroes who made up the NVA that marched into Saigon? Hey...they had tanks, Tigerace!
Click to expand...

Why are you having so much trouble facing the fact that Reagan was complicit in boatloads of atrocities?

Hey.....thousands upon thousands tortured and murdered, but you got a vacation, so clearly they don’t matter, right ;)
 
RF667799 said:
Try to focus. Oh right...if you do that, you just go over ground where you've been badly beaten.
Click to expand...

I am focused. Your narrative is “he must not have done anything wrong because he didn’t get arrested”.

I pointed out that Otto Skorzeny wasn’t arrested either. Clearly, that must mean he didn’t do anything wrong 🙄😂

Much like the rest of the die hards, all you have are impotent shrieks of victory.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Why are you having so much trouble facing the fact that Reagan was complicit in boatloads of atrocities?

Hey.....thousands upon thousands tortured and murdered, but you got a vacation, so clearly they don’t matter, right ;)
Click to expand...

Why do you conflate from one of your humiliations to the other?

You're supposed to be responding to the post you quote. RR wasn't president during the fall of Saigon.

Who marched into Saigon? Can you say it?
 
Tigerace117 said:
I am focused. Your narrative is “he must not have done anything wrong because he didn’t get arrested”.

I pointed out that Otto Skorzeny wasn’t arrested either. Clearly, that must mean he didn’t do anything wrong 🙄😂

Much like the rest of the die hards, all you have are impotent shrieks of victory.
Click to expand...

You've shown no evidence he did anything wrong. You just make claims. When pressed, you show that he wasn't subject to this "international law" you keep barking about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom