Rasmussen: ‘52 percent of voters say their views are more like Palin’s than Obama’s’
By: Mark Hemingway
Commentary Staff Writer
09/20/10 9:10 AM PDT
I don’t know if this poll is an endorsement of Palin or a harsh judgment on the President, but either way it’s not good for the White House:
Fifty-two percent (52%) of Likely U.S. Voters say their own views are closer to Sarah Palin’s than they are to President Obama’s, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.
Just 40% say their views are closer to the president’s than to those of the former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential candidate.
Among the Political Class, however, 68% say their views are more like Obama’s, while 63% of Mainstream voters describe their views as more like Palin’s.
Rasmussen:
Considering that Palin dont know what her views are, then... well. are you saying that 52% of Americans are either just as stupid as Palin or that the poll it self was poorly worded?
Considering that Palin dont know what her views are, then... well. are you saying that 52% of Americans are either just as stupid as Palin or that the poll it self was poorly worded?
Considering that Palin dont know what her views are, then... well. are you saying that 52% of Americans are either just as stupid as Palin or that the poll it self was poorly worded?
Maybe 52% of Americans are female.
Of course her poll numbers are higher. She's doing more for the country than he is. She's helping us get back on track, while he keeps trying to completely derail us.
Hey, I take offense to that. Just because Sarah is a woman doesn't mean that all of us don't have cognitive reasoning abilities :lol:
But your views would be more like Palin's, especially if you looked down. :mrgreen:
52% of Americans can see Russia from their porch?
Hey, I take offense to that. Just because Sarah is a woman doesn't mean that all of us don't have cognitive reasoning abilities :lol:
Well I could say the same thing about Palin now couldn't I.
Personally I do think she thinks she is doing what's best, but it would only hurt this country, not help it if her, or people like her got into any position of power.
Well then, it is a dark day for America.
ROTFLOL... Palin 52% Obama 40%
ROTFLOL... a political MOAB!
And as we know, there are more mainstream folks than pinheads.
Seems they aren't too keen on Obama's definition of Change we can believe in.
.
The average voter doesn't seem to even know what Palin or Obama's postiions actually are, so this isn't really worth a grain of salt.
Pretty much. Even more amusing since Obama is following many of the Bush and Republican positions from the past. It's endlessly amusing how people bash Obama and then want to vote Republican while Obama is enacting Republican agenda items. People have just stopped thinking entirely.
Obamacare was part of the Republican agenda? Cap and trade? Trillions in debt?
Perhaps you should offer some evidence.
Perhaps you should get out from under that rock.
Healthcare bill? Originally GOP. Health insurance mandate began as a Republican idea - The Boston Globe
Cap and Trade? Originally GOP. PolitiFact Ohio | Democratic Rep. John Boccieri invokes GOP Sen. John McCain to back his cap-and-trade stance
Trillions in Debt? Originally GOP. U.S. National Debt Graph: What they Won't Tell You
Here's some more:
Bonus Depreciation? Originally GOP. The impact of bonus depreciation on leasing activity | North America > United States from AllBusiness.com
R&D Credits? Originally GOP. http://www.rdtaxcredit.com:8080/news/
Nuclear Loans? GOP. Obama Administration Preparing to Implement Bush/McCain Energy Policy With Taxpayer Bailout for Southern Company Nuclear Reactors - NIRS
Need I go on? Stop pretending Obama is radically different from Bush. And start treating them with the same standard.
How was your temporary suspension? Give you time to think about stuff?
Who opposed Obamacare, the Democrats or Republicans?
Who opposed Cap and Trade, the Democrats or Republicans?
Who established record debt, the Democrats or Republicans?
obvious Child;1059007437]And this is relevant to my post how?
You asked for evidence of it as a original GOP platform and I gave you it. You are now fallaciously attempting to change to subject.
As I understand the various sulfur emissions bill, both actually. But again you asked for evidence of it as a original GOP platform and I gave you it. You are now fallaciously attempting to change to subject. The GOP. And please note I italicized established to ensure I can hit you when you attempt to change the subject again. But AGAIN you asked for evidence of it as a original GOP platform and I gave you it. You are now fallaciously attempting to change to subject.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?